Status
Not open for further replies.
I tell you guys one thing which is the Patwari Army of Pakistani has sent their puppet to ask for money. Now if they really wanted to press nuclear button, why would they ask for money or aid or investment or care about FATF? What difference would it make whether they are in black list or white or whether they are rich or poor during nuclear war. These jokers in their think tank committe and their army ranks are big time absconders and liars. They bl**dy fear even small scale war forget nuclear war. Their nuclear bluff was exposed, and this was also mentioned by Doval prior to his appointment as NSA that Pakistan is known only for nuclear bluff.

From day one since I got interested into current affairs I was always thinking that hos is it possible for Pakistanis to hold 1 Billion and I kept wondering , and a lot of times this frustrated me I am sure this would have happened to you guys as well. Now the things are clear that, their bluff, their deception and the lethargy in our leadership had given them enough oppurtunity to hold us back. But not any more.
 
India, U.S. trade deal falls through

As I said earlier, Trump was non-committal about terror emanating from Pakistan, and nudged Modi to talk to Imran. Basically, he was pissed that the Trade deal fell through. Unlike past presidents who saw US losses on trade with a country, as a way to secure US strategic interests, Trump emphasizes Trade over everything else, as it ensures long term US strategic and military supremacy, and is loath to allow even strategic partners to benefit if he sees trade as unfair. But, anyway Robert Lighthizer's demands were excessive, and would have put paid to any hopes of realising India as a manufacturing hub.
 
Arsenal for Pakistan prepped, Army now focuses on ammo reserves to deal with China

GEN RAWAT Says :

If we Cannot Win a war with Pakistan in TEN Days , there is NO point of war
Few Posts back, I had given the same timelines. I had stated that we can hold out against China for ten days in case of a two front war and we will have to take out Pakistan within that time. Once we take out Pakistan, it will become a one front war with China and that will result in defeat of China.
 
the two front scenerio will cut in. Given our overwhelming conventional warfare superiority, Pakitsna shud not last more than 4-5 days. Our game is highly mobile and very intense operations.
Sir, with all due respect, guerilla warfare lasts a lifetime. Hope our aim is to take PoK & expel the inhabitants there instead of pacification. We could expendd countless lives & money doing that.
 
Sir, with all due respect, guerilla warfare lasts a lifetime. Hope our aim is to take PoK & expel the inhabitants there instead of pacification. We could expendd countless lives & money doing that.
Please understand the difference between localised military actions and full fledged war. Kargil was a limited war and a localised war. Any future war with Pakistan will not be limited in any sphere. It will be an all out war and we will not have any constraints of whatsoever kind unlike Kargil. In case of a full fledged war, I expect Pakistan to collapse within about three days considering their poor financial state and extremely poor logistics base. Once we start taking out their fuel dumps, their power stations and other such infa, their ability to fight will be finished. And we can do that within about 4-6 hrs of start of war.
Just remember what happened in 1965 and 1971, we blew up their fuel dumps and they gave up. We had caught their tanks intact with empty fuel tanks. They could delay us in Kargil as we did the stupidity of not crossing the LOC. Lal Bahadur Shastri was a better military thinker that Atal Charpayi.
 
India, U.S. trade deal falls through

As I said earlier, Trump was non-committal about terror emanating from Pakistan, and nudged Modi to talk to Imran. Basically, he was pissed that the Trade deal fell through. Unlike past presidents who saw US losses on trade with a country, as a way to secure US strategic interests, Trump emphasizes Trade over everything else, as it ensures long term US strategic and military supremacy, and is loath to allow even strategic partners to benefit if he sees trade as unfair. But, anyway Robert Lighthizer's demands were excessive, and would have put paid to any hopes of realising India as a manufacturing hub.
That's what I was worried about, it was mostly one sided adulation, only thing he said for us radical islamic terrorism in whole speech and that too was mostly for US audience. I was not very enthusiastic after his speech and within hours he was praising Imran who didn't have to create this PR event for him.

Still don't understand how people think US is onboard with most of our ambitious goals (like 370, POK etc.) When they directly undermined US surrender process in Afghanistan. Even if that trade deal sailed thru we will be net loser in it where we buy more and sell lesser. That's the script of every deal with Trump.

It feels more and more like Trump don't want any deal to conclude ever. He just want to keep every deal hanging to use it as leverage to press upon other things. Hope we tightens the screws and not bend over. US can't function in isolation, they will need others eventually when it starts taking toll on domestic front.
 
That's what I was worried about, it was mostly one sided adulation, only thing he said for us radical islamic terrorism in whole speech and that too was mostly for US audience. I was not very enthusiastic after his speech and within hours he was praising Imran who didn't have to create this PR event for him.

Still don't understand how people think US is onboard with most of our ambitious goals (like 370, POK etc.) When they directly undermined US surrender process in Afghanistan. Even if that trade deal sailed thru we will be net loser in it where we buy more and sell lesser. That's the script of every deal with Trump.

It feels more and more like Trump don't want any deal to conclude ever. He just want to keep every deal hanging to use it as leverage to press upon other things. Hope we tightens the screws and not bend over. US can't function in isolation, they will need others eventually when it starts taking toll on domestic front.
It did serve one purpose.. Modi impressed on Donald Trump that India/Modi too can be useful to Donald Trump's re-election, by helping swing a 10 - 15 percent Indian American vote (traditionally democratic) towards Trump. So, this would give him an incentive to not be too hard on India.
Just like Imran/Pakistan offers Trump something useful to take home for re-election, in the form of a Taliban deal... Although howdy Modi was over the top, it did serve India's interest to some extent...
 
That's what I was worried about, it was mostly one sided adulation, only thing he said for us radical islamic terrorism in whole speech and that too was mostly for US audience. I was not very enthusiastic after his speech and within hours he was praising Imran who didn't have to create this PR event for him.

Still don't understand how people think US is onboard with most of our ambitious goals (like 370, POK etc.) When they directly undermined US surrender process in Afghanistan. Even if that trade deal sailed thru we will be net loser in it where we buy more and sell lesser. That's the script of every deal with Trump.

It feels more and more like Trump don't want any deal to conclude ever. He just want to keep every deal hanging to use it as leverage to press upon other things. Hope we tightens the screws and not bend over. US can't function in isolation, they will need others eventually when it starts taking toll on domestic front.
Did you expect Trump to say " Chal bhai Modi. Pakistan ko thokte hain" ? Trump's response was exactly in line with his past responses i.e. completely inconsistent!!
I don't think at this point of time Indian govt is looking for active support from any country to deal with Pakistan. As long as countries remain neutral and do not interfere in our activities, it's good enough for us. And that objective has been achieved by a huge margin, loud and clear. Even Imran Khan himself accepted that yesterday.
 
@nair one more video where Pak official blames India for FATF

the world must praise the followers of mohamada , when they are in little bit trouble they cry out loud and ask for their human rights , and shameless world was quite when actual genocide took place in kashmir ie : kashmiri pundits . shameless sanatan dharmies were busy with their lives with their wifes producing kids and buying cars and kothis and eating gulab jamun that time . we must praise the mullas .
and one thing more @mods why delete my posts ? what personal attacks , writing few words that too in civilized manner but stating facts are personal attacks ? we indians really stand against each other in the name of fake pride of being rational and just to the highest of levels , no matter we chop of the head of a fellow indian consequently and silence him provided we have power to do the same !
 
Last edited:
The Chinese and Pakistanis are now hurting India through useful idiots who can work for them to sabotage Indian military assets before the skirmish happens so that when in need Indian equipment malfunction or the enemy already knows the weakness of it. Bik gaye kuch fauji humarey yahan, ISPR ki ladkiyon kaey chakker mein. Rakshak becomes Bhakshak :mad:
 
the world must praise the followers of mohamada , when they are in little bit trouble they cry out loud and ask for their human rights , and shameless world was quite when actual genocide took place in kashmir ie : kashmiri pundits . shameless sanatan dharmies were busy with their lifes with their wifes producing kids and buying cars and kothis and eating gulab jamun . we must praise the mullas .

It was mostly due to India was blackmailed by domestic and Pakistani mullahs that they can force Arabs not to supply us oil if we do something aggressive. Dissolution of USSR also placed us at backfoot and our economy was in tatters.

How times change. Zia ul haq's pakistaniyat is akin to IT boom for India.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.