After a nationalist govt came to power, nationalist generals and officers also came to power, hence the push back against OFB. And now, OFB is being taken to task. First phase: Corporatisation. Second phase: Belt tightening (losing flab). Third phase: Disinvestment.
The first step was to create alternate suppliers, the process began in 2016 and is still ongoing. The results have been very good.
The second step was to reduce the army's flab, like the restructuring of the workshops.
The third step is to cut off the DDP's influence on the DGQA and bring corruption down to zero, if possible. The DDP within the MoD is a sh!thole of corruption and is now being restructured, along with the DGQA. Also, the DGQA is being moved under the army so that the DDP cannot put pressure on the DGQA to clear substandard weapons and ammo. Currently, the DGQA runs in parallel to the army, is headed by a Lt General and absorbs Lt Cols who could not become Cols in the army, but are awarded the Col rank upon moving to the DGQA (not sure how well that's been working out though). So the DDP, headed by civilians, and the DGQA, run by the army in the near future, will be significantly less integrated thereby reducing the hold the civilian bureaucracy had over the military bureaucracy. Most likely following the Shekatkar Committee's recommendations.
The fourth step is to corporatise OFB with a perform or perish ultimatum.
In the meantime, the govt will continue to give the OFB some ongoing projects (Dhanush, T-90 etc) and new projects (AK-203) in order to prevent worker strikes getting in the way of the army's supplies and also creating election hurdles, while also diversifying suppliers in areas where OFB has been delayed or completely failed, like the Pinaka rockets and artillery guns.
Restructuring the DGQA and corporatisation of OFB signals the start of the war on corruption within the MIC.
@Falcon @vstol Jockey
What's your opinion on all this?