Voting has commenced today.
Yep, looks like nothing new's happened. Gotta make that list now.
Voting has commenced today.
It says 18km range with conventional M107 rounds. How does this compare to ranges of M198 and MKEK Panter?Yes it is.
It says 18km range with conventional M107 rounds. How does this compare to ranges of M198 and MKEK Panter?
Slant against OFB or inclined towards OFB. Saurav Jha is a staunch swadeshi & isn't the Dhanush manufactured by the OFB?Like I specifically replied to this tweet: it is like comparing apples with oranges. One unproven system, needed to be proved. The other, is a proven system participating in an evaluation process.
Please notice how the poster has tried to paint a 'slant' against OFB here. Poor reporting and irresponsible twisting of facts.
Slant against OFB or inclined towards OFB. Saurav Jha is a staunch swadeshi & isn't the Dhanush manufactured by the OFB?
1. I do not want the 155/52 category to have 5 different types of guns(upgraded M46, Bofors, Dhanush, ATAGS and ATHOS) , that will be a mess, increasing costs of operations, put pressure on logistics and what not. I would thereby personally want to see around 114 Dhanush 155/45, around 300 Sharang 155/45, 400-500 Dhanush 155/52 and 1500-1800 ATAGS.
I guess the M46 and Bofors will eventually be replaced over the next 10-15 years. The Dhanush 52 can replace Bofors.
So Dhanush 45/52, Athos and ATAGS in the towed category in the long run.
2. But the 2nd problem is cost. We don't have enough money. And the thing that the Israeli offer is even cheaper than Dhanush 45. That makes things complicated.
I don't think we will buy more than 400 Athos anyway, as long as Dhanush 52 actually clears trials.