With the arrival of FPVs and LMs, the days of massed artillery and armour formations are over. The IA is moving towards IBGs with integrated attack helos for the fluid battlefield of the future. Towed arty will find it difficult to keep up in a mixed formation imho and will be picked off easily unless there is air support.Ukraine & Russia are both failing to deploy a coherent force. Untill our Army is planning to fight in bits and pieces like them, the towed artillery has immense importance.
They should build a system like Archer
Until an effective solution to these cheap FPV drones and loitering munitions becomes available, shoot and scoot seems to be the way forward.towed artillery days are numbered..... Mobile western artillery system both tracked & wheeled are doing ok in Ukraine....massed artillery is not going anywhere, only reason Russians have manage to gain ground lately is because of massive artillery barrages & air support on Ukrainian positions.
DEW & AAA can provide cover in future for towed Systems, but that's a big if.
They should build a system like Archer
One thing Ukrainian war has shown is that towed artillery are slow & way to vulnerable to counter battery fire & drone attacks in modern warfare where situational awareness levels are off the charts......... Investing on Track Artillery platforms like K 9 is the way forward.... Wheeled Artillery while good are not practical for unpaved roads.
Lol as expected both foreign maal are participating under iddm, what a fraud.
Screwdrivegiri will easily win the tender due to cost factor.
What more do u expect from corrupt army.
This was always IDDM from the start. It's a mix of Indian and foreign IPs. It was primarily created to help foreign companies transfer their technologies to Indian companies in a significant and structured way or help them develop their replacements. This includes a roadmap for further indigenization and the Indianization of software.
IDDM is just one step above Buy and Make categories. It's designed to make foreign OEMs give up their tech over time or replace their own tech with Indian alternatives.
Make I and II are for Indian-designed products where IP is held by Indian companies. It retains the possibility of foreign collaboration, but it is centered around creating new IP in India.
Which alternate path?Dhanush L/52 is still under development, and they have an alternate path for its procurement anyway
Which alternate path?
So, in next 5 years we can expect orders for:
I really hope they make some space for MaRG 155-BR. It's criminal not to order it when we export these. I don't see any argument against it.
- 100 K9 repeat
- 307 ATAGS
- 400 TAGS
- 400+ MGS (original requirement of 800)
Why its so expensive?TRAJAN is expensive. It's for rich people, so forget it.