Indian Economy : News,Discussions & Updates

India's next government will have a growth problem

Soutik Biswas, India correspondent, 17 May 2019

View attachment 6690
Economists say India's growth is powered by the 'top 100 million' people

As India lumbers towards the final phase of an exhausting general election and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP seeks a second term in power, there's some worrying news. The world's fastest growing major economy appears to be headed for a slowdown.

The signs are everywhere. Economic growth slowed to 6.6% in the three months to December, the slowest in six quarters. Sales of cars and SUVs have slumped to a seven-year-low. Tractors and two-wheelers sales are down. Net profits for 334 companies (excluding banks and financials) are down 18% year-on-year, according to the Financial Express newspaper.

That's not all. In March, passenger growth in the world's fastest growing aviation market expanded at the slowest pace in nearly six years. Demand for bank credit has spluttered. Hindustan Unilever, India's leading maker of fast moving consumer goods, has reported March quarter revenue growth of just 7%, its weakest in 18 months.

View attachment 6691
Sales of cars and SUVs have slumped to a seven-year-low.

One newspaper wondered whether India was "losing the consumption plot". Taken together, all this points to a fall in both urban and rural incomes, leading to demand contraction. A crop glut has seen farm incomes drop. And credit stagnation, partly triggered by the collapse of a major non-banking financial institution, or a shadow bank, has led to a fall in lending and worsened matters.

Kaushik Basu, former chief economist of the World Bank and professor of economics at Cornell University, believes the slowdown is "much more serious" than he initially believed. "The evidence is now mounting to the point where it can no longer be ignored," he told me.

One reason, he believes, is the controversial currency ban in 2016 - also called demonetisation - which adversely hit farmers. More than 80% of the currency circulating in India's sprawling cash-driven economy was taken out of circulation in what, in the words of one of Prime Minister Modi's own advisers, was a "massive, draconian, monetary shock"

View attachment 6692

"This was evident to all by early 2017. What many observers did not realise then - I did not - is that the shock made the farmers take on debts which ended up causing sustained hardship to them that is continuing and slowing down the agriculture sector."

The other major disappointment, according to Prof Basu, has been exports. "Export growth has been close to zero for the last five years. For a low-wage economy like India, a little policy professionalism - a combination of monetary policy and micro incentives - is all that is needed to grow this sector. It is regrettable that the rhetoric was not backed up with policy design."

Others like economist Rathin Roy, a member of the Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council, believe that India's consumption story could actually be leveling out.

View attachment 6693
India needs to produce more for its domestic market

Dr Roy believes India's rapid growth has been essentially powered by its top 100 million citizens. The leading indicators of economic prosperity, he says, are things that these Indians consume - cars, two wheelers, air conditioners and so on. Having had their fill of home-made goods, they have now moved to imported luxuries - foreign holidays and Italian kitchens, for example.

A majority of Indians want nutritious food, affordable clothing and housing, health and education, which really should be the leading indicators of economic growth. "Subsidies and income support cannot pay for such consumption on a massive scale. At least half the population should earn incomes that enable them to buy these at affordable prices so that a maximum of 500 million people can be subsidised to improve their welfare," Dr Roy says.

Unless India is able to do this in the next decade or so, Dr Roy believes, it is headed for what economists call a "middle income trap", when a country stops being able to achieve rapid growth easily and compete with advanced economies. Economist Ardo Hannson defines it as a situation when countries "seem to get stuck in a trap where your costs are escalating and you lose competitiveness".

View attachment 6694
India's rising upper middle class has substantial disposable income

One problem is that once you are stuck in a middle income trap, it is difficult to get out. A World Bank study found that out of the 101 middle-income countries in 1960, some 13 had become high-income by 2008 based on per capita income relative to the US. Only three of the 13 countries have a population of more than 25 million. India is a lower-middle income economy and to get caught in a trap at this stage will be tragic.

Dr Roy says the classic middle income trap means that the rich are taxed to provide minimum services to the poor, who will kept from extreme poverty and vulnerability by using such taxes to subsidise their existence, including an universal basic income in perpetuity.

"We will be Brazil. On the other hand If India produces what all Indians want to consume efficiently, and at affordable prices, then inclusive growth will stave off the middle income trap. We will be Japan," says Dr Roy.

The next government has its work cut out.

India's next government faces economic slowdown


The the economists are the usual suspects. kisi ko nahi pata kyun ho raha hai.. but sab doctor ban baithe hain..
 
Non-Banking Financial Collapse in the horizon is direct result of demonetization, its the domino effect, let me elaborate.
India had a sizable & flourishing Unorganized companies, like for example traditional plastic fly beater, unbranded, hiring laborer's, paid in cash etc on monthly basis, now how did these Unorganised Informal Companies get the finances from, since they were outside the preview of Formal sector, the only place they could get finances was Non-Banking financial sector.
A huge part of that Unorganised companies disappeared post Demonetization including massive jobs they provided, as they didn't get any decent time to migrate from & sustain operations on a regular basis due to liquidity crunch. So the Non-Banking Financial sector is all but broke due to bad loans & risk of defaulting, as cant carry forward bad loans in books, they would have tried to ride it out, but it was impossible to begin with.
So here the looming domino effect
Unorganised Informal Companies (sizable part disappeared) --> Non-Banking financial sector (broke due to bad loans & risk of defaulting) (This is 1/5th of economy loans) --> Formal Banking sector (as Non-Banking financial sector work on taking loans from Formal Banks)


So fall of one - risks the fall of other, unless Govt moves in and gives massive relief, else can lead to Economic Meltdown in 2-3 years time, with whole system collapsing. Need tons of Liquidity influx to resolve ASAP.

Demonetization wont have had any negative consequence, had new currency already printed & available in banks prehand to exchange & the exercise of demonetization carried over 6 months period, rather than 3 months, giving unorganized companies time to migrate to organized. It was too sudden & too big to break the proviable Camel Back
 
Last edited:
Don't worry they can be discarded as incompetent fools trying to become paper pushers. If you want more enlightened discussion you can follow Sushant Sareen he will tell how worthless is IAS officer and he is nothing but a Babu however armchair defence analysts working few hours a day in AC compound provided by Reliance foundation to peddle agenda based BS are real change makers.

It's useless to debate or discuss this when "magnanimous" people start looking down upon others and degrading those who are struggling to make the ends meet. Why don't these bloody idiots die instead of spoiling their beautiful cities.

I am not getting into same debate again, let the real achievers and change makers on this forum mock these idiots trying to better their life and tell them how they turn around their life and bought 2BHK or a farm house nearing retirement instead of trying to be a paper pusher. The positive change they brought in society by abusing and looking down upon them on forums, telling how unemployable and incompetent they are.
 
Don't worry they can be discarded as incompetent fools trying to become paper pushers. If you want more enlightened discussion you can follow Sushant Sareen he will tell how worthless is IAS officer and he is nothing but a Babu however armchair defence analysts working few hours a day in AC compound provided by Reliance foundation to peddle agenda based BS are real change makers.

It's useless to debate or discuss this when "magnanimous" people start looking down upon others and degrading those who are struggling to make the ends meet. Why don't these bloody idiots die instead of spoiling their beautiful cities.

I am not getting into same debate again, let the real achievers and change makers on this forum mock these idiots trying to better their life and tell them how they turn around their life and bought 2BHK or a farm house nearing retirement instead of trying to be a paper pusher. The positive change they brought in society by abusing and looking down upon them on forums, telling how unemployable and incompetent they are.

I have a different take on this -
I think the article touches upon 2 issues directly. The paucity of jobs in the pvt sector or the presence of the pvt sector up North and the lack of specific skill sets by the said prospective candidates and many more who seek salvation only in government / PSU jobs. With the result we have the same churn of BA / BCom / BSc graduates coming into the mainstream fighting for a diminishing quota of jobs in both public & pvt sector.This category will soon be replaced by BBA / BMS & other parts of the alphabet soup without adding to specific skillsets among our new generation. Consider this - I read recently that the number of industrial apprectices in India is barely 3 lakhs where as it touches 1 million on both Japan & China & exceeds it in Germany .Modi's skill development initiative was a good venture. One wonders how successful is it. It requires a much more holistic look and enhanced participation from the government - both central & state, schools / universities, industry, etc for it to really take off in right earnest. Right now, I believe it's still meandering and work in progress.

The lack of an entrepreneurial culture or spirit except from among the Mercantile castes in this area is also to be noted. You know coming from Bombay as I do, the Gujarati or a Sindhi sees it as an affront to serve anybody else. He'd rather content himself on a small business then associate himself with a company as an employee. Of course this is a generalisation but it's true to a large extent of them. The lack of such a spirit and an enabling environment is also to blame. We talk about macro reforms but when will we reform our state governments or municipal bodies. Why can't licences be sold on an annual basis to petty traders who ply their wares on the streets in selected areas? Doesn't this provide employment and income to families? Ditto for attracting MSME's in industrial zones. While the process is certainly much better as compared to say a decade or two ago it's still time consuming and requires greasing palms.

These and many more issues will have to be tackled on a war footing if Modi is serious about providing mass employment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
I have a different take on this -
I think the article touches upon 2 issues directly. The paucity of jobs in the pvt sector or the presence of the pvt sector up North and the lack of specific skill sets by the said prospective candidates and many more who seek salvation only in government / PSU jobs. With the result we have the same churn of BA / BCom / BSc graduates coming into the mainstream fighting for a diminishing quota of jobs in both public & pvt sector.This category will soon be replaced by BBA / BMS & other parts of the alphabet soup without adding to specific skillsets among our new generation. Consider this - I read recently that the number of industrial apprectices in India is barely 3 lakhs where as it touches 1 million on both Japan & China & exceeds it in Germany .Modi's skill development initiative was a good venture. One wonders how successful is it. It requires a much more holistic look and enhanced participation from the government - both central & state, schools / universities, industry, etc for it to really take off in right earnest. Right now, I believe it's still meandering and work in progress.

The lack of an entrepreneurial culture or spirit except from among the Mercantile castes in this area is also to be noted. You know coming from Bombay as I do, the Gujarati or a Sindhi sees it as an affront to serve anybody else. He'd rather content himself on a small business then associate himself with a company as an employee. Of course this is a generalisation but it's true to a large extent of them. The lack of such a spirit and an enabling environment is also to blame. We talk about macro reforms but when will we reform our state governments or municipal bodies. Why can't licences be sold on an annual basis to petty traders who ply their wares on the streets in selected areas? Doesn't this provide employment and income to families? Ditto for attracting MSME's in industrial zones. While the process is certainly much better as compared to say a decade or two ago it's still time consuming and requires greasing palms.

These and many more issues will have to be tackled on a war footing if Modi is serious about providing mass employment.
There is not enough employment in private sector either, the lack of skill is mostly used as an excuse to hide the problem. We are overpopulated and growing too slow with government doing zilch to salvage the situation, they have only made things worst and in this glorious win this issue maybe buried but it's like time bomb. Almost every MSME is overstaffed or too little work and struggling to pay the loan in small cities and areas. The one being blamed for not being skilled enough if you compare them with already employed this myth will be busted.

People can throw any kind of dressed up numbers from NITI Aayog or private agencies but they never reflect the human element or reality on ground.

The crisis so deep that I can't even begin to explain, one of my relative is a bigshot kind of teacher having a very big coaching network in his name. He broke down few days back in tears and anger because he daily gets hundreds of letters, comments, messages, emails where young minds of India are so desperate that they find no other option left but to commit suicide, he has to hire multiple counsellors so that these kids dont really take such steps. Some are sleeping in park from last 10 days or railway platform because they are overdue on rent and landlord will ask for money if they go back to room, some living on one meal per day, some not able to pay the fees of job application form. Desperation and frustration is so high that human resource that India can capitalize is not just getting wasted but bordering criminality and it's a huge number not talking about few thousands but many lacs.

It's true people are attracted to government jobs but it's not a whole story a lot of them are there because of lack of jobs in private sector. It's a serious situation and government really need to intervene before it's too late no matter whose fault it is, these are the cards you are dealt with, act now instead of blaming. You really need to walk these areas if you want to see the seriousness of situation, it can't be reported. Just walk around, look at those eyes, those fasting steps, those restless anxious talks, it's scary.

Some solutions I think could be:
  • Reducing retirement age to 55
  • Educating them of financial planning
  • Serious steps to control population
  • Revamping academic system that produce unskilled people (as they are blamed to be even after completing standards set by government).
  • Reducing wages of overpaid public sector employees (PSU pays absurd but not limited to them, in village a teacher get paid over 50,000 and most of them are way too incompetent to teach, 50k is absurd amount of money for people in village, it should depend on your location).

Some harsh steps needs to be taken so that instead of few people grabbing everything all get something till population control measures, high growth effects kicks in. It will also reduce the incentive for younger people to go crazy for government jobs.
 
There is not enough employment in private sector either, the lack of skill is mostly used as an excuse to hide the problem. We are overpopulated and growing too slow with government doing zilch to salvage the situation, they have only made things worst and in this glorious win this issue maybe buried but it's like time bomb. Almost every MSME is overstaffed or too little work and struggling to pay the loan in small cities and areas. The one being blamed for not being skilled enough if you compare them with already employed this myth will be busted.

People can throw any kind of dressed up numbers from NITI Aayog or private agencies but they never reflect the human element or reality on ground.

The crisis so deep that I can't even begin to explain, one of my relative is a bigshot kind of teacher having a very big coaching network in his name. He broke down few days back in tears and anger because he daily gets hundreds of letters, comments, messages, emails where young minds of India are so desperate that they find no other option left but to commit suicide, he has to hire multiple counsellors so that these kids dont really take such steps. Some are sleeping in park from last 10 days or railway platform because they are overdue on rent and landlord will ask for money if they go back to room, some living on one meal per day, some not able to pay the fees of job application form. Desperation and frustration is so high that human resource that India can capitalize is not just getting wasted but bordering criminality and it's a huge number not talking about few thousands but many lacs.

It's true people are attracted to government jobs but it's not a whole story a lot of them are there because of lack of jobs in private sector. It's a serious situation and government really need to intervene before it's too late no matter whose fault it is, these are the cards you are dealt with, act now instead of blaming. You really need to walk these areas if you want to see the seriousness of situation, it can't be reported. Just walk around, look at those eyes, those fasting steps, those restless anxious talks, it's scary.

Some solutions I think could be:
  • Reducing retirement age to 55
  • Educating them of financial planning
  • Serious steps to control population
  • Revamping academic system that produce unskilled people (as they are blamed to be even after completing standards set by government).
  • Reducing wages of overpaid public sector employees (PSU pays absurd but not limited to them, in village a teacher get paid over 50,000 and most of them are way too incompetent to teach, 50k is absurd amount of money for people in village, it should depend on your location).

Some harsh steps needs to be taken so that instead of few people grabbing everything all get something till population control measures, high growth effects kicks in. It will also reduce the incentive for younger people to go crazy for government jobs.

While I tend to agree with the gist of your opinion, The reality on the ground is that there is perhaps very little that the government can do to revive the situation. I belong to the school of thought that subscribes to the idea that the fundamental issue plaguing Indian economy is the lack of demand vs economy's capacity. Everything else, including the paucity of jobs, the stagnation of salary, is a symptom and not by itself the issue. Ergo the only way to fundamentally improve the situation is to stimulate a revival in demand. It's not a straightforward task.

The solutions you speak of might help one or two or a thousand, but they will not have a material change in the lives of the tens of millions of unemployed and underemployed youth. Furthermore, we are of the opinion that government is not a employment agency, meant to suck up excess human resources. It is not the job of the government to provide government jobs. We prefer government to focus on capex, where each rupee invested has positive multiplier effect on productivity and capacity generation. Increasing government workforce is basically increasing revenue expenditure which by definition is an expense and is therefore fundamentally an unproductive proposition. It might help one or two, but makes the rest that much worse off.

We appear to be in a new, historically unparalled economic regimen, where high end knowledge drives the economy, and thus by extension, the holders of high end information and skills and capital are the ones benefitting from the economic growth. Everyone else has been shortchanged by the economy. I wish there was a one stop solution to the problem. I wish I came up with one. But it appears there will be no simple fixes this time. It might take a generation or longer for the issues to be sorted out.
 
I belong to the school of thought that subscribes to the idea that the fundamental issue plaguing Indian economy is the lack of demand vs economy's capacity. Everything else, including the paucity of jobs, the stagnation of salary, is a symptom and not by itself the issue
True, exactly my thoughts.

It is not the job of the government to provide government jobs.
Well it is, desperate times desperate measures, when they let the problem grow by inaction you are not left with many options. Government influence every sphere of our life and it's duty of government not to let something grow too big to be a threat to whole system.

Issue is too big to resolve by own who else is big enough to step in and ease the situation?

Increasing government workforce is basically increasing revenue expenditure which by definition is an expense and is therefore fundamentally an unproductive proposition. It might help one or two, but makes the rest that m
That's not what I suggested but they need to do even that because ultimately the money end up in system increasing demand, government revenues almost doubled in 5 years and still they have reduced the workforce by significant numbers. Instead of creating a communist kind of regime of throwing freebies for votes better give them jobs, low paying ones will do just fine.

I have not said that government alone can solve this by hiring absurd number of people but they need to increase number of people they are hiring and take other reforms to boost private sector jobs too.

Net growth in exports in 5 years is almost ZERO. With Trump tightening screws of China companies are trying to shift the manufacturing base, a lot of them already have into South East Asian countries how many came to India? We do see propaganda pieces claiming 200 companies are going to come to India but we have already missed the opportunity and we are not making any serious attempt to lure them.

You diagnosed issue correctly that it's lack of demand but how can you increase demand with joblessness and decreasing/peaked purchasing power? India is growing at 6.5-7 percent from past 5 years yet net growth in exports is ZERO (maybe negative) it's your public that is driving this growth but for long and how much?

Is it not busting the myth of unskilled labor not able to satisfy demand of MSME, how can MSME grow, how much they could have grown if you see these numbers?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DivineHeretic

In the end, the govt has to step back and let credit flow keep recovering. People under-appreciate just how much that was a problem (by UPA 2 complete utter mismanagement and then their diversion to subsidy reliance) in how it percolates to businesses to hire in private sector.

If you want more jobs and growth, the govt needs to see what private sector issues exactly are, what are the (specific govt-related) chokepoints that stop them or slow them. There also need to be lot better information flow on where the jobs (esp regarding trades/blue collar) actually are...given such jobs are actually not being filled because everyone is fed narrative you need to be white collar degree (no matter what the college degree costs, what the quality is, and whether its even relevant to job market in the end) type to make it in todays economy.

If higher (result seeking) govt understands that chokepoints is where the middle to lower govt babu types thrive on (and thus want status quo there for their own benefit) and undertakes more broad merit based performance + assignment there (an arduous, not talked about "reform" but probably the most important one long term for a country)...then you will get better in economic fundamentals. Posters here over think a lot of this as to what the role of govt should even be....trust me....you do NOT want indian govt to get involved more than it is now (in jobs, economy)....it has to hone what it actually already in involved with....and scale back where its doing a net-bad job.

Modi term 2 will be litmus test since term 1 was stabilising the awful utter crap that UPA 1+2 did (costing India at least 1 -2 trillions of dollars in todays GDP, probably lot more). Credit recovery + time to take effect (esp private sector) is a big deal for indian economy....everything else is just lubricant. If they can get land and labour reforms done more...that is extra on top. No there is no instant feedback of modi-magic or anyone when it comes to a macro-economy....5 years simply can only show so much when 10 years of utter crap were done before. People (young or old) in the end also need to take stock of their information chains, decisions and responsibilities better.