Indian Navy LHD/LPD Amphibious Ships : Updates & Discussions

A picture of cargo being loaded/unloaded from LST. Looks very cumbersome/slow due to dependency on port cranes.

Ideally the vessel should have trucks that can roll on/off with the cargo - a limitation inherent to LST design?

These ships are our best fit ships for HADR and NEO, though not ideal. Loading/unloading troops from the LCVP also seems to be a slow process.

1610995598061.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: SammyBoi
There was a spate of accidents in the Navy at the port of Vishakhapatnam between late 2013 to early 2014. The accident were mostly caused by the then ongoing dredging work at the entry to the port channel (known as the Vizag channel).

In January 2014 INS Airavat (L24), the 3rd ship of the Shardul class amphibious tank landing ship, had an accident at the Vizag channel. INS Airavat was returning back to her home port after a patrol of the Bay of Bengal.

The media reported it a week later :

Another Navy ship damaged, hits bottom of Vizag channel

The Navy sacked the Commander of the ship & ordered a probe :

Navy removes INS Airavat captain JPS Virk for harbour mishap

1620035296695.png

The ship was fully loaded, thus floating lower, & seem to have carried a good amount of speed when it entered the port. One of its 2 propellers were hit by the debris from the dredging. The propeller got stuck, the engine kept rotating the shaft eventually twisting and bending the shaft. Some other parts of the hull were also hit.

The damage was so severe that the Navy declared INS Airavat to be unfit for usage and ordered an immediate repair and refit of the ship. Airavat was commissioned in May 2009 and was in service for less than 5 years. 5 years is too short a time for a complete overhaul, so the job was mostly repair with minor refitting work.
1620035330014.png

The ship couldn't be moved around easily. Thus the repair and refit work was handed to the local shipyard at the port the ship was visiting. Shipyard at the port of Vishakhapatnam is the Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. (HSL). The ship was originally designed and manufactured by the GRSE Shipyard at Kolkata.
Screenshot (410).png

Before the repair work began, HSL requested GRSE for blueprints, drawings and other information on the ship. A reasonable request that took a unreasonable amount of time to complete. Bureaucracy wanted to make sure the shipyards followed all the proper procedures before transferring sensitive information. If either shipyard deviated a bit from the official procedure they were told to start again. All this took a while even as the ship lumbered in the shipyard. The Eastern Naval Command was fuming.
Screenshot (409).png

The repair work took around 16 months. Almost half of that time was taken up by the bureaucratic dabbling.
Screenshot (408).png

The shaft that was so damaged that it was declared beyond fixing and HSL decided to make a new one instead.
Screenshot (387).png

The propeller took minimal damage and only needed some grinding and polishing to fix. The Navy initially thought the propeller needed to be replaced and not the shaft.
Screenshot (386).png

The new shaft was mated with HSL's own designed adjustable shaft collar. The assembly was tested for faults using ultrasound.
Screenshot (392).png

Here you can see an ultrasound probe inside the shaft collar. Ultrasound detection is a non-destructive test of materials for detecting microscopic cracks that may have formed during machining.
Screenshot (393).png

The ship returned back to service in mid-2015.
Screenshot (407).png

From then till now the ship has made at least 8-9 trips to the South China Sea, made port calls in a dozen South East and East Asian countries, participated in the ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting Plus military exercise, made numerous supply visits from Vizag to the Andamans, performed numerous HADR missions at home and abroad, recently supplied food relief to Sudan under the UN humanitarian relief program.

Right now INS Airavat (L24) is out with her fleet trying to get liquid oxygen tanks and oxygen generators/concentrators to help with the surge of COVID-19 cases in India.
 
Incredibly detailed requirements. Leaves no loom for ambiguity. The Navy knows what it wants. Let's dig in.

IN currently has 1 LPD: INS Jalashwa (L41) which was acquired from USN. IN also has 5 large & 3 small LSTs in service. The tender calls for 4 LPDs to be built in India. This will be the 1st time LPDs are being made in an Indian shipyard. The anticipated delivery time lines for the 1st vessel is maximum of 60 months followed by delivery of 1 vessel every 12 months.

Specifications of the LPD:

Length: ~200m
Beam: Undefined
Draught: ~8m
Main & Auxiliary Propulsion: IFEP/Hybrid
The ship is to be provided with Electric Propulsion (Integrated Full Electric Propulsion/ Hybrid Propulsion) System based on the recommendations of the PSI study, the design displacement and powering calculations. Shipyard to indicate the best option/ solution for the LPD iro IFEP and Hybrid propulsion. The propulsion system should be capable of achieving the desired max speed for end of service life displacement with a growth margin of not less than 10% each on shaft power to cater for in-service increase in displacement, sea-way margin and in-service degradation is to be catered for. The ship should have two shafts capable of delivering the required power.

Auxiliary Propulsion consisting of Bow Thrusters are to be provided to enable better manoeuvrability. The bow thrusters should be commensurate to the size/ tonnage and displacement of the ship.
Displacement: Undefined
Complement:
(a) Ship’s Crew - 60 officers (30 ship’s officers, another 30 officers of joint staff and additional attachments) & 470 sailors (Total 530).Embarked Personnel - 900 troops.
(b) Additional accommodation facilities for 20 % women officers and 15 % women sailors/ troops of the total strength.
Speed: Max sustained >20 knots, Cruise 14-16 knots
Endurance:
(a) 10,000 nm at economical speed with 25% reserve fuel.
(b) > 45 days in terms of machinery, fuel.
(c) 60 days in terms of logistics support for the embarked troops and ship’s company.
Point defence missile: 36 VL-SRSAMs
Surface to Surface Missile: 16 missiles
ASW: ATDS
Self Defence Suite: 2 MR/LR shaff launchers, Integrated EW (ESM & ECM interfaced with CMS)
CIWS:
(a) 4 x AK 630 with Electro Optical Fire Control System (EOFCS)
(b) 06 X HMGs with stabilised gun control stations/ SRCGs
(c) Directed Energy Weapon (in lieu of AK 630 when developed)
(d) 08 x MMGs
Radar/optical sensors:
(a) 01 x E/ F Band combined Air and Surface Surveillance Radar.
(b) 01 x 3D C/ D Band Air Surveillance Radar.
(c) 01 x Surface Surveillance Radar.
(d) 02 x ‘I’ Band and 01 X E/F COTS Radar.
(e) 01 X EOIRST.
Aviation:
(a) The ship should have a ‘through deck’ design and be capable of accommodating at least 02 Heavy Lift Helicopters, 12 Special Operations Helicopters and 02 NSUAS and permit simultaneous operations of at least 04 Special Ops helicopters (includes operation of 01 NSUAS in lieu). Out of these, at least 12 Special Operations Helicopters and 02 NSUAS would be stowed inside the hangar and atleast 02 Heavy Lift Helicopters would be parked on the deck in blade folded configuration. (b) The foremost helicopter spot is to be strengthened to operate a Heavy Lift Helicopter, with max All Up Weight of 40 Tons
Spec Ops: To be able to embark, stow and operate Chariots (01), SORs (02), SPC (02), AUVs.
Unmanned Ops: To be able to embark, stow and operate variety of sea based Surface, Sub-surface and Air unmanned solutions.
Amphibious Capability:
(a) 04 x LCMs
(b) 04 x LCVPs.
(c) To be fitted for to operate two LCACs or two L-CATs
Assembly Area: The ship is to have a suitable assembly area (catering for at least 300 troops). The assembly area should have easy access to Flight Deck, the well deck and the boat deck(s).
Design: The ship should have a ‘through flight deck’ design and a floodable dock aft (well deck) for launching/ recovery of seaborne payloads.
Hull form: The ship is envisaged to be of mono hull construction based on proven hull form or supported by adequate model testing for resistance, propulsion, manoeuvring sea keeping (iaw latest version of NCD 102) as well as CFD aerodynamic studies/ wind tunnel test.
Boats:
(a) Four Large RHIBs iaw latest IN specifications.
(b) Two Medium RHIBs iaw latest IN specifications.
(c) Six General Purpose Inflatable Crafts with single point lift for hoisting/ lowering by single arm radial davit/ crane
Sea Worthiness: The ship should be capable of the following (iaw limits indicated in NATO STANAG 4154 as well as other limits/ restrictions imposed by the design/ equipment fitted):-
(a) Transit on all headings up to Sea State 7.
(b) Operating helos at all headings up to Sea State 5 and Sea State 6 at best heading as per NATO STANAG 4194 and 4154.
(c) Combat system operation up to Sea State 6.
Special Operations Complex:
(a) Special Ops complex catering for requisite requirements of Spl Ops teams needs to be included to ensure seamless launch of missions for 80 personnel. (b) The ship is likely to embark two Special Operation RHIBs (SORHBs) (length 15 mtrs and weight 10 T) for undertaking special operations, including lowering arrangement and usage in high sea states and fuelling facility. (c) Suitable launching/ recovering arrangement and stowage space for two chariot crafts/ SPC be provided. (Length 12 mtrs, Weight 6 tons). (d) Air conditioned stowage space for two man-portable Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (length 2 m, weight 100 kg) anticipated to be launched from SORHBs/ other boats of suitable size. (e) One dedicated armoury for stowage of specialist arms and ammunition to be provided which should be near Special Ops Complex

Details about the landing craft mechanized (LCMs):

(a) LOA and breadth 23 m x 6.5 m approx.
(b) Draught < 5 ft.
(c) Cargo Carrying Capacity 60T.
(d) Speed of 20 kn plus at light load and minimum 15 kn in full load.
(e) Endurance 200 nm.
(f) Troop carrying 200 (approx). (g) Sea Worthiness - operate in up to Sea State 3 and should survive up to Sea State 5
(h) The hull structure of the LCM should be of DMR 249 A.
(j) The LCM's should have two diesel engines driving two propellers/ water jets.
(k) The ramps are to be operated by hydraulic motor system with multiple redundancy in case of primary power failure
(l) When the main propulsion is running, the boats supplies are to be met through engine driven alternators

Details about the Landing Craft Vehicle Personnel (LCVPs):

The ship is to be fitted for to embark 4 x LCVPs. The LCVP should be davit mounted/ housed on deck within the well dock or with any other suitable hoisting/ lowering/ stowage arrangement. The essential parameters of the LCVPs are as follows:- (a) LOA and breadth 43 feet m x 10.5 feet. (b) Weight – NMT 9.5 tons. (c) Maximum Speed – NLT 12 knots. (d) Endurance – 200 nm. (e) Vehicle carrying capacity – NLT 4.0 tons.


Details about the Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCACs):

The ship is to be fitted for to embark two LCACs in lieu of 4 x LCMs. The essential parameters of the LCAC are as follows:-
(i) Length: < 88 ft.
(ii) Breadth: < 48 ft.
(iii) Height: < 24 ft.
(iv) Cargo Capacity: > 75 T.
(v) Troop carrying capacity: > 180 troops.

Details about the Landing Catamarans (L-CATs):

The ship is to be fitted for to embark two L-CATs in lieu of 4 x LCMs. The essential parameters of L-CAT are as follows:-
(i) Length: < 99 ft.
(ii) Breadth: < 42 ft.
(iii) Cargo Capacity: > 100 T.
(iv) Troop carrying capacity: > 180 troops.

The ship gives off a very San Antonio class LPD vibe. The insistence on the "through flight deck" is the defining trait. San Antonio class is the successor of the Austin class LPD which the INS Jalashwa belongs to. I guess its a natural progression. The USN has deployed the San Antonio class in joint exercises with us.

Check pdf for more details.
 

Attachments

Incredibly detailed requirements. Leaves no loom for ambiguity. The Navy knows what it wants. Let's dig in.

IN currently has 1 LPD: INS Jalashwa (L41) which was acquired from USN. IN also has 5 large & 3 small LSTs in service. The tender calls for 4 LPDs to be built in India. This will be the 1st time LPDs are being made in an Indian shipyard. The anticipated delivery time lines for the 1st vessel is maximum of 60 months followed by delivery of 1 vessel every 12 months.

Specifications of the LPD:

Length: ~200m
Beam: Undefined
Draught: ~8m
Main & Auxiliary Propulsion: IFEP/Hybrid
The ship is to be provided with Electric Propulsion (Integrated Full Electric Propulsion/ Hybrid Propulsion) System based on the recommendations of the PSI study, the design displacement and powering calculations. Shipyard to indicate the best option/ solution for the LPD iro IFEP and Hybrid propulsion. The propulsion system should be capable of achieving the desired max speed for end of service life displacement with a growth margin of not less than 10% each on shaft power to cater for in-service increase in displacement, sea-way margin and in-service degradation is to be catered for. The ship should have two shafts capable of delivering the required power.

Auxiliary Propulsion consisting of Bow Thrusters are to be provided to enable better manoeuvrability. The bow thrusters should be commensurate to the size/ tonnage and displacement of the ship.
Displacement: Undefined
Complement:
(a) Ship’s Crew - 60 officers (30 ship’s officers, another 30 officers of joint staff and additional attachments) & 470 sailors (Total 530).Embarked Personnel - 900 troops.
(b) Additional accommodation facilities for 20 % women officers and 15 % women sailors/ troops of the total strength.
Speed: Max sustained >20 knots, Cruise 14-16 knots
Endurance:
(a) 10,000 nm at economical speed with 25% reserve fuel.
(b) > 45 days in terms of machinery, fuel.
(c) 60 days in terms of logistics support for the embarked troops and ship’s company.
Point defence missile: 36 VL-SRSAMs
Surface to Surface Missile: 16 missiles
ASW: ATDS
Self Defence Suite: 2 MR/LR shaff launchers, Integrated EW (ESM & ECM interfaced with CMS)
CIWS:
(a) 4 x AK 630 with Electro Optical Fire Control System (EOFCS)
(b) 06 X HMGs with stabilised gun control stations/ SRCGs
(c) Directed Energy Weapon (in lieu of AK 630 when developed)
(d) 08 x MMGs
Radar/optical sensors:
(a) 01 x E/ F Band combined Air and Surface Surveillance Radar.
(b) 01 x 3D C/ D Band Air Surveillance Radar.
(c) 01 x Surface Surveillance Radar.
(d) 02 x ‘I’ Band and 01 X E/F COTS Radar.
(e) 01 X EOIRST.
Aviation:
(a) The ship should have a ‘through deck’ design and be capable of accommodating at least 02 Heavy Lift Helicopters, 12 Special Operations Helicopters and 02 NSUAS and permit simultaneous operations of at least 04 Special Ops helicopters (includes operation of 01 NSUAS in lieu). Out of these, at least 12 Special Operations Helicopters and 02 NSUAS would be stowed inside the hangar and atleast 02 Heavy Lift Helicopters would be parked on the deck in blade folded configuration. (b) The foremost helicopter spot is to be strengthened to operate a Heavy Lift Helicopter, with max All Up Weight of 40 Tons
Spec Ops: To be able to embark, stow and operate Chariots (01), SORs (02), SPC (02), AUVs.
Unmanned Ops: To be able to embark, stow and operate variety of sea based Surface, Sub-surface and Air unmanned solutions.
Amphibious Capability:
(a) 04 x LCMs
(b) 04 x LCVPs.
(c) To be fitted for to operate two LCACs or two L-CATs
Assembly Area: The ship is to have a suitable assembly area (catering for at least 300 troops). The assembly area should have easy access to Flight Deck, the well deck and the boat deck(s).
Design: The ship should have a ‘through flight deck’ design and a floodable dock aft (well deck) for launching/ recovery of seaborne payloads.
Hull form: The ship is envisaged to be of mono hull construction based on proven hull form or supported by adequate model testing for resistance, propulsion, manoeuvring sea keeping (iaw latest version of NCD 102) as well as CFD aerodynamic studies/ wind tunnel test.
Boats:
(a) Four Large RHIBs iaw latest IN specifications.
(b) Two Medium RHIBs iaw latest IN specifications.
(c) Six General Purpose Inflatable Crafts with single point lift for hoisting/ lowering by single arm radial davit/ crane
Sea Worthiness: The ship should be capable of the following (iaw limits indicated in NATO STANAG 4154 as well as other limits/ restrictions imposed by the design/ equipment fitted):-
(a) Transit on all headings up to Sea State 7.
(b) Operating helos at all headings up to Sea State 5 and Sea State 6 at best heading as per NATO STANAG 4194 and 4154.
(c) Combat system operation up to Sea State 6.
Special Operations Complex:
(a) Special Ops complex catering for requisite requirements of Spl Ops teams needs to be included to ensure seamless launch of missions for 80 personnel. (b) The ship is likely to embark two Special Operation RHIBs (SORHBs) (length 15 mtrs and weight 10 T) for undertaking special operations, including lowering arrangement and usage in high sea states and fuelling facility. (c) Suitable launching/ recovering arrangement and stowage space for two chariot crafts/ SPC be provided. (Length 12 mtrs, Weight 6 tons). (d) Air conditioned stowage space for two man-portable Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (length 2 m, weight 100 kg) anticipated to be launched from SORHBs/ other boats of suitable size. (e) One dedicated armoury for stowage of specialist arms and ammunition to be provided which should be near Special Ops Complex

Details about the landing craft mechanized (LCMs):

(a) LOA and breadth 23 m x 6.5 m approx.
(b) Draught < 5 ft.
(c) Cargo Carrying Capacity 60T.
(d) Speed of 20 kn plus at light load and minimum 15 kn in full load.
(e) Endurance 200 nm.
(f) Troop carrying 200 (approx). (g) Sea Worthiness - operate in up to Sea State 3 and should survive up to Sea State 5
(h) The hull structure of the LCM should be of DMR 249 A.
(j) The LCM's should have two diesel engines driving two propellers/ water jets.
(k) The ramps are to be operated by hydraulic motor system with multiple redundancy in case of primary power failure
(l) When the main propulsion is running, the boats supplies are to be met through engine driven alternators

Details about the Landing Craft Vehicle Personnel (LCVPs):

The ship is to be fitted for to embark 4 x LCVPs. The LCVP should be davit mounted/ housed on deck within the well dock or with any other suitable hoisting/ lowering/ stowage arrangement. The essential parameters of the LCVPs are as follows:- (a) LOA and breadth 43 feet m x 10.5 feet. (b) Weight – NMT 9.5 tons. (c) Maximum Speed – NLT 12 knots. (d) Endurance – 200 nm. (e) Vehicle carrying capacity – NLT 4.0 tons.


Details about the Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCACs):

The ship is to be fitted for to embark two LCACs in lieu of 4 x LCMs. The essential parameters of the LCAC are as follows:-
(i) Length: < 88 ft.
(ii) Breadth: < 48 ft.
(iii) Height: < 24 ft.
(iv) Cargo Capacity: > 75 T.
(v) Troop carrying capacity: > 180 troops.

Details about the Landing Catamarans (L-CATs):

The ship is to be fitted for to embark two L-CATs in lieu of 4 x LCMs. The essential parameters of L-CAT are as follows:-
(i) Length: < 99 ft.
(ii) Breadth: < 42 ft.
(iii) Cargo Capacity: > 100 T.
(iv) Troop carrying capacity: > 180 troops.

The ship gives off a very San Antonio class LPD vibe. The insistence on the "through flight deck" is the defining trait. San Antonio class is the successor of the Austin class LPD which the INS Jalashwa belongs to. I guess its a natural progression. The USN has deployed the San Antonio class in joint exercises with us.

Check pdf for more details.
Superb analysis !

Reminds me of BRF. Absolutely no storytelling. Just plain factual analysis. Real delight to read .

Well done !!
 
The main changes are requirement for 40-ton heli handling and 16x SSM.
I wonder what SSMs they will use. Can't be a cruise missile. Most likely naval rocket artillery. Oh wait, RBU-6000 ? 😑 😑
No expertise though they would be involved as design partners. Tbh , they didn't have expertise or experience during the design of INS Vikrant too though they did go for external consultancy. I wonder why can't it be done now .
Yep, my thoughts exactly. Get a consultancy set up with the US shipyard that built the San Antonio class. It was Huntington, I think. Then hand over the production of modules to multiple shipyards like with the Nilgiri class.
 
Why not naval design bureau.
When there are multiple designs available in the market it's better to choose the best-suited one and produce under license. NDB only makes things inefficient and sometimes expensive. IAC and Project 28 are prime examples. The design revisions that went into these ships after kneel laid are too many.
 
When there are multiple designs available in the market it's better to choose the best-suited one produce under license. NDB only makes things inefficient and sometimes expensive. IAC and Project 28 are prime examples. The design revisions that went into these ships after kneel laid are too many.
One day they will have to gain capability.
 
One day they will have to gain capability.
Not really, the shipyard like L&T or CSL will develop the expertise in time. NDB will concentrate on major surface combatants and SSN.

This was the L&T Juan Carlos offer last time (with a length of 214 meters). I guess +/-10% on length would be allowed. @Parthu
Navantia-L&T Juan Carlos Indian Version Specs
View attachment 10738
 
Not really, the shipyard like L&T or CSL will develop the expertise in time. NDB will concentrate on major surface combatants and SSN.


This was the L&T Juan Carlos offer last time (with a length of 214 meters). I guess +/-10% on length would be allowed. @Parthu

It would certainly look tailor-made for Mistral (Naval Group-HSL consortium offer) and might very well be designed to create conductive environment for nominating HSL. MoD leaves no stone unturned to sideline/exclude L&T.

As of length, its still RFI stage so there CAN be some room to play with that. Will be interesting to see if Navantia offers a further modified Juan Carlos that's even shorter (ski-jump omitted ofcourse).

More I look at it, more it seems like the previous tender was just a way to solicit responses, get a feel for the Pvt sector's tie-up, and then develop a new RFI that specifically excludes their offer. Won't be the first time MoD/IN played dirty games with L&T with regard to the LHD/LPD program.