From any baseline legacy platform, we will easily outdo Russians today. Whatever comes out will be better than atleast the best Russians will have then for sure.
At the end of the Cold War, the Russians scrapped several dozen N-subs with US funding (nuclear radiation hazard). However, they have since rebuilt their submarine arm into a world-class force.
Even at the cost of large surface ships (no replacement for Kirov/Moskva class in sight), their N-sub production lines continue to hum. They are already planning a 5G SSN design called Husky.
Unlikely they will share cutting-edge tech with anybody, including India. These are their crown jewels.
Rumours say that the IN wanted to lease a Yasen for Chakra-3 but the request was turned down by the Russians.
I'd be glad if that were possible. To me, a 10,000t hull suggests a large, double-hulled sub of the Russian mould. A bigger hull means better quieting, more weapons and better crew facilities so no complaints. The Yasen is a more refined design than Akula.
Scaling a Suffren hull to 10,000t would not be practical (unless France wanted to share insights on their next-gen SNLE-3G missile sub - bigger boat based on Suffren) or cost-effective.
I wouldn't be surprised if the basic design for our SSN had been frozen already.