'1' is reading RSS shaka propoganda. 'we' standing outside and watching them amused and wondering what kind of pot are these on?
Indian Political Discussion
- Thread starter Parul
- Start date
'1' is reading RSS shaka propoganda. 'we' standing outside and watching them amused and wondering what kind of pot are these on?
Red-faced Congress distances itself from Salman Khurshid's 'hounded' remark for Zakir Naik
The Congress today sought to downplay as "individual opinion" the remarks made by party leader Salman Khurshid on controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, and said the party maintains that the law will take its own course in the case.
Congress spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil said there should be no politics on the basis of religion and an accused in any case should be viewed as an individual and not as one belonging to a particular religion, caste or association.
"Our stand has been made clear earlier also that in this country maintaining peace and unity is very important and there should be no politics on the basis of religion," he told reporters."We have internal democracy and our party is not like the BJP where voices are shut. One can have an individual opinion," the Congress leader said.
In an apparent reference to Zakir Naik, Khurshid had yesterday said the country could not afford to have question marks on people in important positions in public, but if there was no culpability of an individual, one should not be continued to be "hounded".
Naik is facing various cases, including for hate speech and money laundering, in India and has been staying abroad to evade arrest.The National Investigation Agency (NIA) had first registered a case against the 51-year-old Islamic preacher under anti-terror laws in 2016 for allegedly promoting enmity between different religious groups.
Asked about the Congress' stand on the issue, Gohil said, "The law should take its own course. The Congress, even if it is our colleague, we have never tried to save anyone, but the BJP does it".He alleged that the BJP has different yardsticks for different people.
"If it is a case against Amit Shah or their leaders, you have a different yardstick and if it is against Lalu Prasad, you have a different yardstick," the Congress leader added.
Red-faced Congress distances itself from Salman Khurshid's 'hounded' remark for Zakir Naik
The Congress today sought to downplay as "individual opinion" the remarks made by party leader Salman Khurshid on controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik, and said the party maintains that the law will take its own course in the case.
Congress spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil said there should be no politics on the basis of religion and an accused in any case should be viewed as an individual and not as one belonging to a particular religion, caste or association.
"Our stand has been made clear earlier also that in this country maintaining peace and unity is very important and there should be no politics on the basis of religion," he told reporters."We have internal democracy and our party is not like the BJP where voices are shut. One can have an individual opinion," the Congress leader said.
In an apparent reference to Zakir Naik, Khurshid had yesterday said the country could not afford to have question marks on people in important positions in public, but if there was no culpability of an individual, one should not be continued to be "hounded".
Naik is facing various cases, including for hate speech and money laundering, in India and has been staying abroad to evade arrest.The National Investigation Agency (NIA) had first registered a case against the 51-year-old Islamic preacher under anti-terror laws in 2016 for allegedly promoting enmity between different religious groups.
Asked about the Congress' stand on the issue, Gohil said, "The law should take its own course. The Congress, even if it is our colleague, we have never tried to save anyone, but the BJP does it".He alleged that the BJP has different yardsticks for different people.
"If it is a case against Amit Shah or their leaders, you have a different yardstick and if it is against Lalu Prasad, you have a different yardstick," the Congress leader added.
Red-faced Congress distances itself from Salman Khurshid's 'hounded' remark for Zakir Naik
UP Congress leaders 'cheat' in test conducted to appoint party spokespersons, question paper leaked
The Congress party in Uttar Pradesh was left red-faced after its members allegedly cheated in a test conducted to appoint party spokespersons. The Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee (UPCC) had on Thursday conducted a test where party members seeking appointment to the post of the spokespersons were made to answer 14 questions.
The questions that were asked ranged from 'how many blocks are there in Uttar Pradesh' to 'what are the key points of failure of Yogi Adityanath government?' However, soon after the question paper was released, its photos were seen circulated on social media. It is also being said that the Congress leaders took the help of internet in the examination hall to answer the questions.
Nearly 70 party members took the test and appeared for the interview conducted by the UPCC. The members were reportedly not in the know of any such exam that will be conducted to test their readiness for the post.
The questions were also aimed at testing how good these candidates were to corner the state government. They were asked questions around the achievements of the previous Manmohan Singh government, three headlines of the day on which Congress spokespersons can issue statements and failures of the Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh. They were also asked why they wanted to become spokespersons.
An overhaul of the state unit of the party is expected ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Earlier this year, the Congress had organised a 'talent hunt' in Madhya Pradesh to find a suitable spokesperson. Online applications were filled and a team from Delhi had been sent to the state to assess the candidates.
UP Congress leaders 'cheat' in test conducted to appoint party spokespersons, question paper leaked
The Congress party in Uttar Pradesh was left red-faced after its members allegedly cheated in a test conducted to appoint party spokespersons. The Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee (UPCC) had on Thursday conducted a test where party members seeking appointment to the post of the spokespersons were made to answer 14 questions.
The questions that were asked ranged from 'how many blocks are there in Uttar Pradesh' to 'what are the key points of failure of Yogi Adityanath government?' However, soon after the question paper was released, its photos were seen circulated on social media. It is also being said that the Congress leaders took the help of internet in the examination hall to answer the questions.
Nearly 70 party members took the test and appeared for the interview conducted by the UPCC. The members were reportedly not in the know of any such exam that will be conducted to test their readiness for the post.
The questions were also aimed at testing how good these candidates were to corner the state government. They were asked questions around the achievements of the previous Manmohan Singh government, three headlines of the day on which Congress spokespersons can issue statements and failures of the Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh. They were also asked why they wanted to become spokespersons.
An overhaul of the state unit of the party is expected ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Earlier this year, the Congress had organised a 'talent hunt' in Madhya Pradesh to find a suitable spokesperson. Online applications were filled and a team from Delhi had been sent to the state to assess the candidates.
UP Congress leaders 'cheat' in test conducted to appoint party spokespersons, question paper leaked
You mean you are dirt poor, i agree compared to Telugu states and Karnataka you are dirt poor. Mr. Icchadari Nagin.
That may well be the case , but in this respect I admire Putin . Russia under him hasn't taken any prisoners . Even the Israelis are to be admired . They get such men back to Israel to face trials in case the person is of Jewish origin .
I updated my status here the day he departed and suddenly minorities were in danger. He was looking for 3rd term purely based on identity, when denied didn't wait a second to show his true colors. Who said making you VP gives you class and maturity, sometimes boot licking of a family is embedded into blood of sycophants, it's tragic they spoil the decent name of VP of India.
LOL, You agree Congress rule made you dirt poor!
Congress will always be Murdabad until you remove Sonia, Rahul,Priyanka, Chidambaram, Ahmed patel and Ghulam nabi azad,. This collection is ANTI HINDU, we are never going to support your Congress, i guess you already know that! That is why you lost as i told you i come from a Congress family., we saw your character how you treated PV Naramimsha Rao and Sita ram kesari. If you support this collective from Vatican and try to snatch our desh, boy you will have a WAR that will envelope all of your Christian/Islamic lands! and the world
If you want to come out of Anti-Hindu image then lose these leaders and then we can talk. or else. F$$k off
that Sore loser who wants Sharia courts and writes against HINDUS! Why didnt all Muslims go to Pakistan their homeland? they rioted for it! Is Hamid Ansart doing us a favor? Why didnt you go to Pakistan after 90% MUSLIM LEAGUE VOTED FOR ISLAMIC PAKISTAN AND HINDU INDIA!
Who is at fault here? you or us?
We didn't have anything to do with Muslims past riots and Partition of India, You got what you wanted, why stick around? Dont say we couldnt travel , i will pay out of my pocket for your travel as will all other Hindus, Please go to Pakistan, You are a Religion which will kill others, My Ancestors fought, died defending mine religion for 1300 years, so Please leave our land! If some A-s-shole is going to decide we will be Secular while there are 120 Christian countries and 55 Islamic countries, and we cant have ONE HINDU NATION! THEN BLOOD WILL FLOW LIKE RIVERS!
Last edited:
Perhaps. But not in seats in Assembly or Lok Sabha. Whereas 1 seems to be lacking both and gk and commonsense.