Islamic Republic of Afghanistan : News & Discussions

After 'caliphate' collapse, jihadists head to Afghanistan to plot attacks
Islamic State fighters who waged a bloody campaign in Syria and Iraq are heading to Afghanistan to continue their jihad and help plot "spectacular" attacks against America, a US official has said.

The warning comes as IS seeks to assert a regional influence after the loss of its self-proclaimed Middle East "caliphate", and as South Asia reels from a series of devastating attacks.

"We know some have already made their way back here and are trying to transfer the knowledge, skills and experience they learned over there," a senior US intelligence official in Kabul said in a recent interview.

"If we don't continue counterterrorism pressure against (IS in Afghanistan), there will be an attack in our homeland - and a spectacular attack - probably within the year," added the official, who asked not to be named for security reasons.

The official did not describe the nature of any plot, but IS has been linked to or inspired several big attacks in America, including a 2016 mass shooting in Florida.

The gunman, who had sworn allegiance to IS, killed 49 people in an Orlando nightclub.

A recent UN report said IS in Afghanistan has between 2,500 and 4,000 members - about the same number the Pentagon was citing two years ago, even though officials say thousands of jihadists have been killed.

US Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said after a recent visit to Afghanistan that IS in the Khorasan, or IS-K as the local affiliate is known, had grown in both numbers and capabilities.

In 2017, the Pentagon offered a rosy assessment that IS-K could be wiped out by the end of that year. But Resolute Support, the NATO mission in Afghanistan, underestimated the group's tenacity.

"Resolute Support realised that this was bigger than a little problem in southern Nangarhar and instead would take something more to address it," the official said, referring to IS-K's bastion in eastern Afghanistan.

The official and a team of experts arrived in Kabul over the past year to help General Scott Miller - the four-star general in charge of US and NATO forces - tackle IS-K.

He did not say how many former "caliphate" fighters are in Afghanistan, but argued "any number is significant".

Europeans - including from Britain and France - are among those who have joined IS-K, he added.

Their presence could complicate any peace deal with the Taliban, who have pledged to prevent terrorists using Afghanistan as a haven to plot foreign attacks.

"Unless or until we get the Taliban to work and address this problem as well, they will never be able to keep this land free from outwardly facing organisations," the official said.

BAGHDADI IS BACK

The US has led an unrelenting air campaign, including famously dropping the so-called Mother Of All Bombs (MOAB), the Pentagon's largest non-nuclear bomb, to smash jihadist tunnels and bunkers.

But the well-funded group has replenished its ranks with foreign fighters and local recruits looking for a decent wage.

IS-K has suffered losses in the northern Jowzjan province but maintains strongholds in Nangarhar and Kunar in the east, where they have beaten back Taliban forces and displaced thousands of locals.

Internationally, IS claimed responsibility for a string of recent attacks, including the Easter Sunday bombings that killed 253 people in churches and hotels in Sri Lanka.

On Monday, the jihadists' elusive leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi apparently resurfaced in a propaganda video, his first purported appearance since 2014.

IS-K conducted six high-profile attacks in Kabul in 2016, according to the US. In 2017 that number grew to 18, and last year there were 24. On Apr 20, IS claimed a suicide attack on a government ministry.

Some Afghan officials question whether IS always oversees such assaults, or if the Taliban and Pakistan groups such as the Al-Qaeda-affiliated Haqqani network are responsible.

"These attacks are carried out mostly by these Afghan and Pakistani groups, while the credit goes to Daesh who is ready to jump and claim it," an Afghan security official said, using the Arabic name for IS.

NEW RECRUITS

Disillusioned Taliban insurgents sometimes switch to IS-K over spats or for ideological reasons, viewing the Taliban as not austere enough in their interpretation of Islam.

Tech-savvy recruiters track and groom potential jihadists through social media and in Kabul's universities, where middle-class and upwardly mobile students are sometimes targeted.

They are "looking for men who ... have been taught at schools paid for by this coalition. That's a little aggravating", the official said.

Thomas Joscelyn, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies and editor of its Long War Journal, said that while the US military had failed to beat IS-K, it "probably stymied their growth and disrupted their operations at times".

"But it hasn't taken them out of the game," he said.
After 'caliphate' collapse, jihadists head to Afghanistan to plot attacks
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
Afghan Gov. Begins Merging Outposts With Military Bases
The Ministry of Interior has begun merging the outposts with big military bases across the country, saying this is to reduce the military causalities since the outposts are vulnerable against the attacks.

“The decision was made to merge the militarily worthless outposts with the big military bases through a process and it is underway.” Said Khushhaal Sadaat, the Deputy Minister of Interior.

At the same time, the Afghan Army has increased targeting the Taliban’s positions to prevent their movements.
In addition, the Ministry of Defense has recaptured three districts from the Taliban, saying the local army will be used to keep the recaptured areas under control.

“We first make plans on how to keep the recaptured areas and then look for the enemy,” said Yasin Zia, the Deputy of Defense Ministry.

According to the officials, the irresponsible gunmen are recruited to the local army and their activities have begun in Ghazni and Faryab provinces.

“The irresponsible gunmen have been recruited into the local army under a specific procedure. Fortunately, it has positive results in Ghazni province,” said Abdulmatin Big, the Chief of Independent Directorate of Local Governance.

At the same time, NATO’s Resolute Support Mission Commander in a visit alongside the Afghan security officials to Faryab province stressed that NATO is committed to supporting the people of Afghanistan.
This comes as the Taliban and the Afghan government claim suppressing each other in the battlefields during the recent peace process talks.
Afghan Gov. Begins Merging Outposts With Military Bases - Ariana News
 
Afghanistan Army Killed 811 Pakistan Supported Taliban Terrorists In Last 13 Days

1564341202986.png


In last 13 days, 811 Pakistan Supported Taliban Terrorists were killed and 324 Terrorists were wounded as a result of continuous clearance operations. Huge quantity of Arms and Ammunition and Drugs were seized and vehicles used by Taliban were destroyed. These figures are provided by Ministry of Defense, Afghanistan during different press releases over the past 13 days.

As per the Press Releases by Ministry of Defense, Afghanistan on their official website, over past 13 days (16-July 2019 to 28-July 2019), Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, launched 141 joint offensive & clearance operations, and conducted 1178 Commandos, Special Forces operations in different parts of the country, in order to remove security threats, destroying the enemy’s sanctuaries and ensure better security to the people of Afghanistan, Afghan Air Forces conducted 1607 flights and carried out 244 airstrikes on enemies’ positions in support of these operations.

As a result, 811 Pakistan supported Taliban Terrorists killed (including some Pakistani Terrorists and Army Regulars that were fighting along with Taliban Terrorists) and 324 were wounded and 30 were detained.

Joint offensive & clearance operations – 141
Commandos, Special Forces Operations – 1178
Number of flights by Afghan Air Forces – 1607
Total Number of Airstrikes – 244
Number of Taliban Terrorists Killed – 811
Number of Taliban Terrorists Wounded – 324
Number of Taliban Terrorists Detained – 31


1564341071999.png


Data as per Ministry of Defense, Afghanistan from 16-July 2019 to 28-July 2019 Press Releases showing 811 Pakistan supported Taliban Terrorists Killed in last 13 days.

Data as per Ministry of Defense, Afghanistan from 16-July 2019 to 28-July 2019 Press Releases showing 811 Pakistan supported Taliban Terrorists Killed in last 13 days. These operations were conducted with support of Resolute Support and Afghan Air Forces in, Ghazni, Wardak, Helmand, Kandahar, Uruzgan, Faryab, Zabul, Badghis, Takhar, Paktikah, Balkh, Sir-e Pol, Logar, Ghor, Kunar, Kunduz and Nangarhar provinces

During the operations huge quantity of Arms and ammunition were seized. Many vehicles belonging to Taliban Terrorists were destroyed.

As per the sources, ANDSF operations are continuous. These operations will continue every day and all year long. Taliban will remain on the run until they surrender or rejoin the modern Afghan society.

Afghanistan Security Forces arrested a key Taliban commander “Ahmad Shah” along with 3 of his accomplices during Special Operation in Dangam District of Kunar province. Afghan special forced also seized some weapons and ammunition. We obtained the video showing the Arms and Ammunition recovered.

Meanwhile, ISIS Terrorist in Eastern Afghanistan also killed many Pakistan supported Taliban Terrorists in eastern Province of Nangarhar and seized lots of Weapons. One of the Terrorists was a Pakistan Army Regular. Afghanistan Security Forces recovered his ID card as an Evidence.

On 27-July 2019, Afghan Special Forces repelled a failed Taliban attack in Anar Dara District of Farah province, killing a Taliban commander and few of his Terrorist gang. As per sources, these Taliban terrorists were supported by Pakistan Army.

As per a source, “The security situation in some districts of Kandahar and Uruzgan provinces has deteriorated during the recent months.”

“Taliban Terrorists are active in some districts of the two provinces and often conduct terrorist related activities, killing civilians – women and Children.”

Meanwhile, the Afghan forces routinely conduct counter-terrorism operations against the anti-government armed groups in the two provinces.

The U.S. forces also conduct regular airstrikes in restive parts of the country to suppress Taliban and other anti-government militants.

There is a continuous onslaught of Afghanistan Security Forces and regular Air strikes at Taliban hideouts. Taliban are leaving their hold on many areas and escaping. There is a growing enchantment in the Taliban ranks. Taliban are disappointed with their leadership who is sitting in Palaces while the ordinary people are instigated using the religious hate content to target Afghan civilians. Many Taliban Terrorists have laid their arms before the Afghan security forces and joining the peace process.

On 22-July 2019, 5 Taliban Terrorists laid down their arms and joined the peace process in Laghman Province in Afghanistan. We obtained a video showing the arms and ammunition recovered from the surrendered, Pakistan Supported Taliban Terrorists.On 23-July 2019, 20 Taliban Terrorists also laid down their arms before the Afghanistan Security Forces and joined the peace process in Eastern Province of Nangarhar.

On 24-July 2019, 17 Taliban including ISIS members joined the peace process in Eastern province of Nangarhar. They also laid down their arms in front of the Afghanistan Security Forces and joined the mainstream.

In the meanwhile, Taliban Terrorists continue to recruit more civilians. They were seen distributing their radical religious textbooks, audio books, leaflets in all of districts in Helmand province. Some of these Taliban Terrorists even have social media links to keep the Taliban Terrorists connected to the web internationally.

Recently Taliban Terrorists and their religious ministers visited schools in few districts of Herat province (Shindand, Farsi, Ghorian, Adraskan, and Pashtun Zarghun) and distributed radical hateful audio messages, books, leaflets, and imparted training to the new recruits on how to be active online.

There are growing voices in Balochistan Nation as well as Afghanistan for unity between Afghan and Baloch people. People believe that Pakistan Army and its supported Terrorists are the common enemies of both the Nations. Pakistan is sending Taliban Terrorists to kill civilians in Afghanistan. Pakistan is also sending Death Squads (Terrorists groomed by Pakistan Army) to kill Baloch civilians and burn their villages.

As per people, both Balochistan and Afghanistan are the victims of Pakistan sponsored Terrorism. Both the nations should fight the Pakistan Army in coordination.

In a series of tweets on 24-July 2019, Baloch leader Bashir Zeb Baloch has said that its time for Baloch and Afghan to unite to fight for their identity against the common enemy. In a series of tweets, the Baloch leader said that it seems highly likely that our region will soon be engulfed in an international war that is bound to heavily impact Balochistan and Afghanistan.

Bashir Zeb further said that the most plausible approach in this situation for both Afghan and Baloch nations is to further strengthen their alliance and fight the future adversaries together in order to protect national identity and achieve true freedom.

Kabul is on the path of becoming a normal Capital city. One of the person said, “The removal of security check-posts, guns and blast walls from the main roads, gives the citizens some feeling of security. We are less scared. Thank you”On 17-July 2019, Ministry of Defense spokesperson Ahmadzai during a media briefing at the GMIC said, “Kabul-Kandahar is fully cleared of enemies threats and people can freely travel on this highway. Operations to clear all highways is ongoing.

During recent Imran Khan meeting with President Trump, while answering a question from a Pakistani Journalist, President Donald Trump replied:

“I think Pakistan is going to help us out to extricate ourselves. We’re like policemen. We’re not fighting the war. If we wanted to fight a war in Afghanistan and win it, I could win that war in a week. I just don’t want to kill 10 million people. Does that make sense to you? I don’t want to kill 10 million people.”

“I have plans on Afghanistan that, if I wanted to win that war, Afghanistan would be wiped off the face of the Earth. It would be gone. It would be over in — literally, in 10 days. And I don’t want to do — I don’t want to go that route.”

“So we’re working with Pakistan and others to extricate ourselves. Nor do we want to be policemen, because basically we’re policemen right now. And we’re not supposed to be policemen. We’ve been there — we’ve been there for 19 years, in Afghanistan. It’s ridiculous. And I think Pakistan helps us with that because we don’t want to stay as policemen. But if we wanted to, we could win that war. I have a plan that would win that war in a very short period of time. You understand that better than anybody.”

His remarks evoked different responses in Afghanistan.

One Twitter user said, “Do not ever threat an #Afghan with violence, We will rise as one and we will face every threat the way we have taken on 1000s of previous ARMIES n CONQUERERS ,work with us to transform Asia but should u Threaten our existence everybody will be destroyed, not just us”

Another tweet said, “If religious fanatics want to take it the religious way one thing I can tell you is that they dont refer to #Afghans as “GODS AXE” for no reason in holy books. It’s because when GOD needs to straightened out an army, nation and/or an empire they send us. TAKE this however u want to”

Colonel Rahman Rahmani in a series of tweets said, “Let’s remember these 3 things when reacting to Pres Trump’s statement:”

“1- Trump is far away from diplomacy & his statements shouldn’t be taken for granted. He made worst statements on America’s stronger allies such as British & India. So, we r not the one & only state.”

“2- We must not let this statement to create division in our diplomatic approach to the US. Imagine, if we were instead of Americans who have been attacked by our president (Karzai Sahib) + 100 times. So, patient is needed on both sides.”

“3- Before fueling the tensions, we must think who benefits from them? Obviously, Pak who is sit to decide our fate in DC. Let’s work to take the ownership of peace & war. Let’s work to convince Trump admin that Pak will not adhere to its promises. A terror state can’t be trusted!”

Pakistan has over the years offered a safe haven to Taliban members, who have targeted not just American forces but troops from all over the world who were part of NATO and the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. We covered about skepticism over US-Taliban talks at Doha in our previous article 606 Pakistan Sponsored Taliban Terrorists Killed, 284 Wounded In Last 8 Days

Former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Ryan Crocker, who has said he experienced Pakistani duplicity firsthand when the U.S. Embassy in Kabul was attacked—allegedly by what Crocker called “Pakistan-based insurgents”—said he views Trump’s outreach as part of an awkward departure plan that all sides will see through.

“I have had this sense from the start that by going into talks with the Taliban, without the Afghan government being there, we’ve effectively been saying, ‘We surrender.’ I see this as a pretty clumsily managed part of that overall endeavor,” Crocker told Foreign Policy.

Pakistan, Crocker added, may well induce the Taliban—who will be willing to go along—to accede to U.S. demands that the militants no longer attack U.S. forces, but that will only be a ruse to accelerate an American departure. And no matter what Khan might promise Trump, the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence agency and military will continue to oversee their active support of the Taliban, he said.

“They will look forward to the Taliban taking over the country,” Crocker said. “That’s been behind their almost two-decade refusal to clamp down on the [Taliban] leadership.”

As per an Article World residing to pay high imprint for US president Donald Trump’s sordid romance with Pakistan PM Imran Khan

From the Doha Accord — the roadmap for peace talks signed early this month — it’s clear the Taliban isn’t on board, at least not yet. The English version of the accord assures Afghan women of their fundamental “rights in political, social, economic, educational, cultural affairs”. But the Pashtu version — that the Taliban insists is the official one — has no reference to women’s rights at all. The English and Dari versions of the Doha Accord do not have any mention of the withdrawal of foreign forces as a precondition for peace. The Pashtu version does.

Perhaps worse, the parties have agreed to “institutionalize [an] Islamic system in the country for the implementation of comprehensive peace”. This clearly suggests Afghanistan’s existing constitutional system, that claims to be based on religious principles, will be overthrown. In the Taliban’s view, moreover, an “Islamic system”.

This shouldn’t surprise anyone. Following a dialogue in Moscow early this year, a Taliban statement described the current Afghan constitution as “un-Islamic”, and labelled women’s rights “immoral”. And Taliban chief Haibatullah Akhundzada vowed in an Eid message to continue fighting until “ending the occupation and establishment of an Islamic system”.

Little imagination is needed to see why the Taliban isn’t willing to embrace a republican system. From a recent report from United Nations experts, among other sources, we know the Taliban works closely with global jihadist groups like Al-Qaeda, along with Pakistan’s Lashkar-e-Taiba. Younger Taliban commanders, ideologically committed to the global jihad, see anything short of total power in Afghanistan as a betrayal.

In large parts of Afghanistan, moreover, Taliban shadow governments already rule — their power cemented with generous revenue from narcotics trafficking and taxes on businesses. Few young commanders see sense in giving up that power for arrangements governed by legal norms, in which elections can change fortunes overnight.

Taliban greybeards like Abdul Gani Baradar, the outfit’s key negotiator in Doha would like to see the organisation leave politics altogether: Now that god has “given victory in the political and military fields,” he said, “instead of a desire for power, they should think about service to Islam”.

Zalmay Khalilzad — Trump’s Afghanistan policy czar — has, in the course of his long career, demonstrated formidable talent for defending the indefensible. Khalilzad has made clear to Trump that the ISI alone can coerce the Taliban into sticking with whatever deal it makes, at least until his re-election campaign is out of the way. Faced with crippling financial pressures, Islamabad has reason to cooperate — though no-one is sure if it actually has the power to enforce its wishes on the Taliban.

In a 1998 report, Physicians for Human Rights documented the Islamic Emirate’s war against Afghanistan’s women: The closing down of schools, the denial of medical care facilities, public floggings and institutionalized child-rape. It noted that men faced “extortion, arrest, gang rape, and abuse in detention because of their ethnicity or presumed political views”.

Afghanistan Army Killed 811 Pakistan Supported Taliban Terrorists In Last 13 Days – Indian Defence Research Wing .
 
Taliban says differences resolved on U.S. troop withdrawal

This doesn't seem like the US will be maintaining any presence in Afghanistan. At least not in any sizeable nos. It may be just a token presence. In which case, if I'm not mistaken, the US & India may have a tacit agreement that any bolstering of the incumbent GoA & the Northern Alliance will be outsourced to India. The implication being that Amit Shah's statement of taking back PoK wasn't made in the heat of the moment. For , if we have to open up supply lines, that's the only way we can do it.

There's definitely a plan to this effect and the US will be playing neutral this time backing up India behind the scenes. I am of the opinion, this will be put into motion after the US concludes a deal with the Taliban and the withdrawal takes place. As of now, Sept 1st is touted to be the date before which the US hopes to sign such an agreement with the Taliban. Which means that the withdrawal would take 2-3 months to effect, post which we are free to prosecute our claims in PoK. Your opinions @Falcon ; @vstol Jockey
 
Taliban says differences resolved on U.S. troop withdrawal

This doesn't seem like the US will be maintaining any presence in Afghanistan. At least not in any sizeable nos. It may be just a token presence. In which case, if I'm not mistaken, the US & India may have a tacit agreement that any bolstering of the incumbent GoA & the Northern Alliance will be outsourced to India. The implication being that Amit Shah's statement of taking back PoK wasn't made in the heat of the moment. For , if we have to open up supply lines, that's the only way we can do it.

There's definitely a plan to this effect and the US will be playing neutral this time backing up India behind the scenes. I am of the opinion, this will be put into motion after the US concludes a deal with the Taliban and the withdrawal takes place. As of now, Sept 1st is touted to be the date before which the US hopes to sign such an agreement with the Taliban. Which means that the withdrawal would take 2-3 months to effect, post which we are free to prosecute our claims in PoK. Your opinions @Falcon ; @vstol Jockey

AFAIK, the US will withdraw half their contingent. The other half will remain for non-combat duties, like the rest of NATO.

The withdrawal itself will take 9-15 months. Taliban wants 9 months, Trump wants 15.

As for outsourcing to India, we will most likely (most definitely) not send our troops there. But I do hope the US allows the entry of American armed security contractors into the warzone. The number of armed contractors has increased from 1000 odd to over 2000 since Trump came to power. These guys are a bit more heavy handed than regular troops. They may not get the job done, but at least they are a better bet than the regular army, which has pretty much failed at containing the situation.

But yeah, the situation in Afghanistan is going to be very cruicial if we are to try something in PoJ&K.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sathya
AFAIK, the US will withdraw half their contingent. The other half will remain for non-combat duties, like the rest of NATO.

The withdrawal itself will take 9-15 months. Taliban wants 9 months, Trump wants 15.

As for outsourcing to India, we will most likely (most definitely) not send our troops there. But I do hope the US allows the entry of American armed security contractors into the warzone. The number of armed contractors has increased from 1000 odd to over 2000 since Trump came to power. These guys are a bit more heavy handed than regular troops. They may not get the job done, but at least they are a better bet than the regular army, which has pretty much failed at containing the situation.

But yeah, the situation in Afghanistan is going to be very cruicial if we are to try something in PoJ&K.
Also maybe instead of just training officers in Indian institution, we should also look at training NCO and Soldiers. Just a thought.
 
AFAIK, the US will withdraw half their contingent. The other half will remain for non-combat duties, like the rest of NATO.

The withdrawal itself will take 9-15 months. Taliban wants 9 months, Trump wants 15.


You're right about this. I recall reading an article recently which mentions these dates. However, from the report I've attached, it seems clear they've reached some sort of an agreement for US withdrawal - the full details of which will be known shortly.


As for outsourcing to India, we will most likely (most definitely) not send our troops there. But I do hope the US allows the entry of American armed security contractors into the warzone. The number of armed contractors has increased from 1000 odd to over 2000 since Trump came to power. These guys are a bit more heavy handed than regular troops. They may not get the job done, but at least they are a better bet than the regular army, which has pretty much failed at containing the situation.

There seems to be two likely scenarios I'd like to draw out.

Scenario - 1: The US & NATO partially withdraw their troops in a time span of 9-15 months post which they induct contractors there to fill in the vacant roles. The problem with this is - what's the Command & Control { C & C } Structure going to be like ? For any effective support to be rendered to the ANA, the US will have to retain some semblance of an C & C. I'm sure this must have been factored into by the Taliban while negotiating with the US. They have been categorical in their demand that the US / NATO effect total withdrawal. Besides this is problematic from another PoV. Given the deterioration of the US relations with both Iran & Russia, the remnants of the US there will certainly face hostiles all around. Then it's only a matter of time before US capitulates and effects a total withdrawal leaving the incumbent GoA to its fate. Its more a case of postponing the inevitable. From the press reports coming out it seems amply clear that Khalilzad has reached some sort of an understanding with the Taliban which negates the scenario of retaining some US / NATO presence in Afghanistan in which case the case to induct more contractors in Afghanistan after the regular US / NATO troops move out appears to be still born.

From India's PoV , the above scenario only buys time before PA & it's minions gain their much vaunted Strategic Depth post which the usual infiltration in Kashmir will pick up pace and we'd be fighting a defensive offence battle in our own backyard with the occasional Balakote every time the attrition rate goes beyond an acceptable level. This is precisely what we've been doing since the last 3 decades with the Balakote type response being the only difference. Granted we're much better prepared than what we were 2 decades ago and Pakistan a lot weakened. But if Afghanistan falls to the Taliban, the situation in Kashmir will definitely get worse.

Scenario 2 : The US / NATO withdraws within the deadline set by the Taliban i.e - 9 months lock stock & barrel leaving the GoA to its own devices which as we've seen earlier will unfold in front of a relentless combination of the PA & Taliban.

From India's PoV, that leaves us with a window of opportunity post 9 months to effect our strategy of retaking PoK and opening up supply lines to Kabul assuming that's the agreement we've with the US.

This may or may not involve boots on the ground. I'm of the opinion it'd be the middle ground where our primary aim would be ensuring a steady supply of money and material apart from technical support and training and plenty of covert ops including black ops by our SF. I don't forsee the IA being deployed in theatre operations within Afghanistan.


The other advantage is, with the US out of the way, Russia & Iran may not be welcoming of the Taliban. While one doesn't expect them to actively oppose the Taliban and aid the ANA / Northern Alliance, one cannot rule out such co operation in the future. After all the NA have been time tested allies in the battle against the Taliban.

But yeah, the situation in Afghanistan is going to be very cruicial if we are to try something in PoJ&K.
I think it's about time we pull our weight in the neighborhood. This is as good an opportunity we'd get to prosecute our claims in PoK.

There's another aspect to it which is internal. As of now with the massive presence of security forces within the Valley, we can enforce peace thru sheer intimidation. But we can't maintain such levels indefinitely. Once these levels begin to thin, the Kashmiris are bound to hit the street.

If we indulge in them using kid gloves, it'd only embolden them to take a more strident position. OTOH, if we come down on them with an iron Fist this entire move will backfire Returning us to the early 90's and Jagmohan's governorship thus opening up a Pandora's box, internationalising the situation, giving Pakistan an upper hand and justification to launch their proxies into Kashmir with a good deal of local involvement too by way of Kashmiri militants.

I'm afraid, which ever way you look at it, we need to be proactive and create a second front in order that we can manage our situation in a more effective manner. The only solution to this conundrum is keeping up an active western Front for PA and the key to it lies in PoK. Else it'd be deja vu all over again.
 
Last edited:
Also maybe instead of just training officers in Indian institution, we should also look at training NCO and Soldiers. Just a thought.

Basic training is pointless. The Afghans are spitting out 2500 troops a month already in Kabul. Plus NATO is already providing a lot more than we can, since they are physically present next to the troops when they are on active duty.

But we are already providing advanced training to trained troops. Stuff like counter insurgency, reading maps, counter IED etc.

What the Afghans and Americans actually need help with is training on Russian aircraft. We are already fixing up 50 of their aircraft. And they are looking at bringing in repair and overhaul facilities for the Mi-17 with India's help. The Americans want to buy Russian spares through India as well.
 
There seems to be two likely scenarios I'd like to draw out.

Scenario - 1: The US & NATO partially withdraw their troops in a time span of 9-15 months post which they induct contractors there to fill in the vacant roles. The problem with this is - what's the Command & Control { C & C } Structure going to be like ? For any effective support to be rendered to the ANA, the US will have to retain some semblance of an C & C. I'm sure this must have been factored into by the Taliban while negotiating with the US. They have been categorical in their demand that the US / NATO effect total withdrawal. Besides this is problematic from another PoV. Given the deterioration of the US relations with both Iran & Russia, the remnants of the US there will certainly face hostiles all around. Then it's only a matter of time before US capitulates and effects a total withdrawal leaving the incumbent GoA to its fate. Its more a case of postponing the inevitable. From the press reports coming out it seems amply clear that Khalilzad has reached some sort of an understanding with the Taliban which negates the scenario of retaining some US / NATO presence in Afghanistan in which case the case to induct more contractors in Afghanistan after the regular US / NATO troops move out appears to be still born.

From India's PoV , the above scenario only buys time before PA & it's minions gain their much vaunted Strategic Depth post which the usual infiltration in Kashmir will pick up pace and we'd be fighting a defensive offence battle in our own backyard with the occasional Balakote every time the attrition rate goes beyond an acceptable level. This is precisely what we've been doing since the last 3 decades with the Balakote type response being the only difference. Granted we're much better prepared than what we were 2 decades ago and Pakistan a lot weakened. But if Afghanistan falls to the Taliban, the situation in Kashmir will definitely get worse.

Scenario 2 : The US / NATO withdraws within the deadline set by the Taliban i.e - 9 months lock stock & barrel leaving the GoA to its own devices which as we've seen earlier will unfold in front of a relentless combination of the PA & Taliban.

From India's PoV, that leaves us with a window of opportunity post 9 months to effect our strategy of retaking PoK and opening up supply lines to Kabul assuming that's the agreement we've with the US.

This may or may not involve boots on the ground. I'm of the opinion it'd be the middle ground where our primary aim would be ensuring a steady supply of money and material apart from technical support and training and plenty of covert ops including black ops by our SF. I don't forsee the IA being deployed in theatre operations within Afghanistan.


The other advantage is, with the US out of the way, Russia & Iran may not be welcoming of the Taliban. While one doesn't expect them to actively oppose the Taliban and aid the ANA / Northern Alliance, one cannot rule out such co operation in the future. After all the NA have been time tested allies in the battle against the Taliban.

What the Americans mean by "withdrawal" is neither of those two scenarios. They plan to whittle down their numbers from 14000 to 8000. The soldiers being withdrawn are the ones who are fighting. The ones who are supporting and training will continue to stay in Afghanistan. So it's not a full blown retreat. It's just a carrot meant to bring the Taliban into the democratic process. The ol' fight with ballots, not bombs tactic. Whether it will work or not, I don't know. But this is a very juicy carrot since the Taliban can fight ANA troops, but not the US troops.

Scenario 1: Taliban will stop fighting and participate in the democratic process.
Scenario 2: Taliban will start fighting after a brief lull.
Scenario 3: Taliban will just continue doing their own thing and keep fighting anyway.

Regardless of what happens, all three are bad for India. Scenario 1 will give Pakistan teeth to fight against India due to a largely peaceful western border. Scenario 2 and 3 will remove the American pressure on Taliban and they can try to take back Afghanistan. In both cases, Pakistan's western border will no longer be under as much pressure as it is under today.

I think it's about time we pull our weight in the neighborhood. This is as good an opportunity we'd get to prosecute our claims in PoK.

There's another aspect to it which is internal. As of now with the massive presence of security forces within the Valley, we can enforce peace thru sheer intimidation. But we can't maintain such levels indefinitely. Once these levels begin to thin, the Kashmiris are bound to hit the street.

If we indulge in them using kid gloves, it'd only embolden them to take a more strident position. OTOH, if we come down on them with an iron Fist this entire move will backfire Returning us to the early 90's and Jagmohan's governorship thus opening up a Pandora's box, internationalising the situation, giving Pakistan an upper hand and justification to launch their proxies into Kashmir with a good deal of local involvement too by way of Kashmiri militants.

I'm afraid, which ever way you look at it, we need to be proactive and create a second front in order that we can manage our situation in a more effective manner. The only solution to this conundrum is keeping up an active western Front for PA and the key to it lies in PoK. Else it'd be deja vu all over again.

I agree with creating this second front. But we can't do it on our own. We can't send and maintain troops in Afghanistan because we are neither rich enough nor do we have proper sea access into Afghanistan. Not to mention, we are inadvertently creating a third front ourselves.

The best bet is to simply fund the TTP and BRAS. Give them both $500M a year each and they will bring the heat to Pakistan in a way the PA will not be able to handle at all. But the govt has been averse from doing this since forever, and that's unlikely to change in the near future. The problem with both groups is, TTP is associated with ISIS and BRAS is disliked by both Pakistan and Iran. Without sea access, we can't do anything there on our own. If we don't play our cards right, we can get cut off from Afghanistan permanently.

What I'm actually hoping for is the US-Taliban peace process fails completely and we see a new round of fighting. This will hopefully go on for 10 more years and really wring Pakistan dry (this time, no aid to Pakistan and their name firmly etched in the FATF blacklist). In the meantime, we can do things at our own leisure with regards to PoJK.

Only the US can sit in Afghanistan, show their middle fingers to both Iran and Pakistan, and continue staying there without any problems. India can't do anything without American presence. If the US leaves, then our only hope is for Afghanistan to keep fighting until we become powerful enough to walk into Pakistan and dismember it completely with little loss to ourselves.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Milspec
I am really hoping for another term for Ghani, if Saleh gets to the corridors of power, he will light up the Pakistanis.