Islamic Republic of Afghanistan : News & Discussions

Over 60 Taliban terrorists killed by Afghan Forces

Early days yet. But I've a feeling the Taliban and its masters in Pakistan aren't about to get a walkover the GoA, even after the US + NATO departs.

@BlackOpsIndia
Khamaa reports casualties daily of Taliban fighters, they are not far behind in numbers compared to Afghanistan security forces but problem is one suicide bomber widen the gap.

Right now government is in open so easy to target when Taliban will be in control one suicide bomber will do same damage to Taliban. Plus when in power you'll need money, a lot of it to run the country else face rebellion everywhere, can Pakistan sustain both Afghanistan and Pakistan? Definitely not, this situation will create friction between Pakistan and Taliban for sure. We'll have our chance of moving in then, provided Taliban regime doesn't collapse by its own weight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Anonymous_
Khamaa reports casualties daily of Taliban fighters, they are not far behind in numbers compared to Afghanistan security forces but problem is one suicide bomber widen the gap.

Frankly, this is where the US + NATO troops can play a big role. Their absence will be desperately felt. It isn't just a question of training the Afghans, equipping them with drones, providing them links to satellites for targeted killings along with more helos, tanks perhaps, field artillery, rockets, rpgs, better rifles, ammo, etc but the sheer professionalism and reliability those troops bring which the Afghans, however good they are will find it difficult to duplicate more so since they'd be up against the PA in direct combat.


Right now government is in open so easy to target when Taliban will be in control one suicide bomber will do same damage to Taliban. Plus when in power you'll need money, a lot of it to run the country else face rebellion everywhere, can Pakistan sustain both Afghanistan and Pakistan? Definitely not, this situation will create friction between Pakistan and Taliban for sure. We'll have our chance of moving in then, provided Taliban regime doesn't collapse by its own weight.


I've a one word answer to your query on sustainability of the Taliban in Afghanistan - China.
 
Frankly, this is where the US + NATO troops can play a big role. Their absence will be desperately felt. It isn't just a question of training the Afghans, equipping them with drones, providing them links to satellites for targeted killings along with more helos, tanks perhaps, field artillery, rockets, rpgs, better rifles, ammo, etc but the sheer professionalism and reliability those troops bring which the Afghans, however good they are will find it difficult to duplicate more so since they'd be up against the PA in direct combat.
Everyone is hesitant to provide any high tech equipment to Afghans as they are ultimately going to end up with Taliban. Combat there is difficult due to favorable conditions for guerrilla warfare, sadly no amount of high tech equipment is going to change that, US has used everything at their disposal in past 17 years and it yielded nothing.

Only solution is cutting the umbilical cord that nurtures these terrorists and that is Pakistan, US need to follow up of their promise of bombing Pakistan to stone age if they are serious about peace in Afghanistan.

I've a one word answer to your query on sustainability of the Taliban in Afghanistan - China
I very much doubt so, China has way more problems than she can handle. They have whole lot of investment about to default in multiple countries in Africa, then so many defaulters in Asia too including Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Nepal, Maldives, Malaysia and so on. How many countries can China bail out and for what? Some mineral deposits? Taliban can't give it for free, they have to prove they are not sell outs or bitch of Pakistan therefore they will be less flexible then present day goverment. Pakistan wasn't able to negotiate Durand line with Taliban back when it was only country supporting them, today Taliban is not so isolated with US granting them legitimacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Anonymous_
Ex-Afghan president says peace before elections
Peace in Afghanistan is a priority and must precede the presidential elections, former Afghan President Hamid Karzai said Wednesday.

"First peace. The priority for us now is peace in Afghanistan. Once we have peace and stability then we can conduct our elections more properly," Karzai told Anadolu Agency as he welcomed recent efforts by the U.S. and Russia, saying his wish is "to see them succeed."

"I hope for improvements as we are seeing the start of some form of cooperation between the U.S. and Russia on the peace process on Afghanistan, and also we are seeing the Chinese involvement in this. There will be meeting tomorrow in Moscow between the representatives of the U.S., Russia and China. That's a very good sign," he said.
He insisted the resolution of the Afghan conflict can be only peaceful and Afghans must play a significant role in its design.

"For too long my country suffered from war and conflict. For too long it does not have an equal seat that was to decide its fate,” he said. “It is very clear by now that the resolution of the conflict in my country can not come from the violence. The idea of a military solution is now more containable than ever before."

Karzai praised "Russia's good will" in getting different factions of Afghans to the negotiating table as "exemplary".
He said further efforts must be based on and encourage intra-Afghan dialogue. It should also be transparent and supported by the regional players.

Finally, he suggested the development of a new security mechanism for cooperation between major international and regional actors so that Afghanistan would be "a point of cooperation and not of confrontation."

Karzai puts hopes on the traditional assembly of Afghan people, or loya jirga. He said it is "a historical institution that always helps the country in time of a great need."
Ex-Afghan president says peace before elections