Nowadays, no one uses Google Search for fact-checking; you use AI. Who knows how the public sector works? You need to verify some information for details; AI can assist you with that.
This is a lesson that if you are dependent on other nations for LRUs and other subsystem level components for your prototypes then that is definitely going to have an impact on the readiness of the prototype.
IMO, if you look at the pattern, most major milestones in Indian public sector companies seem to be planned around the financial year-end. Because of that, expecting major progress from HAL in the middle of the year may be unrealistic. If the IAF does not accept the LCA Mk1A by the financial year-end, it could turn into a deadlock between the HAL and IAF leadership. Hope the MoD is looking into the matter.AI can't tell the difference between right and wrong info, and most definitely cannot analyze using clues.
It's fine for fact-checking established and proven things, but not for things that are still happening or yet to happen.
The thing is HAL cannot book revenue until aircraft start getting delivered.IMO, if you look at the pattern, most major milestones in Indian public sector companies seem to be planned around the financial year-end. Because of that, expecting major progress from HAL in the middle of the year may be unrealistic. If the IAF does not accept the LCA Mk1A by the financial year-end, it could turn into a deadlock between the HAL and IAF leadership. Hope the MoD is looking into the matter.
IMO, if you look at the pattern, most major milestones in Indian public sector companies seem to be planned around the financial year-end. Because of that, expecting major progress from HAL in the middle of the year may be unrealistic. If the IAF does not accept the LCA Mk1A by the financial year-end, it could turn into a deadlock between the HAL and IAF leadership. Hope the MoD is looking into the matter.
yeah it happens every few years to few decades, nothing new about it.delay of a few months.
yeah as long there are bakra tax payers whose govt keeps giving tenders to HAL there is nothing to worry about stock price.stock as a result will bear the brunt.
I have seen school kids come up with better rebuttals, this ain't X mate.yeah as long there are bakra tax payers whose govt keeps giving tenders to HAL there is nothing to worry about stock price.
They are monopoly as such it is a guaranteed revenue if not today they get paid later, there will be zero penalty. For private companies there is a floor plan cost which they need end up paying for vehicles idling on the lots, no such thing for our govt PSU's. As such it will be creative accounting at the end of the day for these PSU's, they will just book the revenue for next year. It will not have much impact on stock price.I have seen school kids come up with better rebuttals, this ain't X mate.
The point I was trying to make is that unless HAL delivers the said aircraft to the IAF, they cannot book any revenue and as time progresses, the amount of aircraft stored up at their facilities across Bengaluru and Nashik is only going to increase.
They have already accumulated close to Rs.15,000 crore in unbooked revenue due to a variety of factors, and adding more and more to this ever increasing backlog isn't sustainable to them.
They also need to pay their suppliers, most of them are Pvt MSMEs who will stop doing their work if they don't get paid.
I have seen school kids come up with better rebuttals, this ain't X mate.
The point I was trying to make is that unless HAL delivers the said aircraft to the IAF, they cannot book any revenue and as time progresses, the amount of aircraft stored up at their facilities across Bengaluru and Nashik is only going to increase.
They have already accumulated close to Rs.15,000 crore in unbooked revenue due to a variety of factors, and adding more and more to this ever increasing backlog isn't sustainable to them.
They also need to pay their suppliers, most of them are Pvt MSMEs who will stop doing their work if they don't get paid.

yeah it happens every few years to few decades, nothing new about it.
But what are they going to do if the user won't accept the aircrafts, acceptable given signed requirements are not filled, or some new requirements are asked for
The lesson is not to trust these people with timelines.This is a lesson that if you are dependent on other nations for LRUs and other subsystem level components for your prototypes then that is definitely going to have an impact on the readiness of the prototype.
I seriously wonder why we went ahead with importing the IRST module when DRDO's indigenously designed & developed IRST was there.
It's a DPSU and a monopoly. Everyone's job is secure regardless of how the company is perceived. The user has no choice but to come back again, regardless of the shoddy workmanship or even the risk of loss of life, because it is a monopoly.I don't know why anyone thinks HAL isn't in most hurry to deliver the aircraft, more than anyone in this cycle. It's the only way they get paid, it's the only way to protect their reputation.
The lesson is not to trust these people with timelines.
UTTAM is fully Indian, who are we going to blame delays of it? martians ?.
One has to be serious dumbass to call indian IRST is "ready".
DRDO made a rational choice to import because they knew very well that it would take a long time to be ready. Imagine fully betting on UTTAM 5 years ago. Today, at least they can blame third-party proven radar for integration delays.
Its just for prototypes.First time I'm hearing of an imported IRST for LCA Mk2.
Nah, it's getting DRDO's IRST and MAWS.
Looks like the Internet making sh!t up as usual.
That is no reason to hold the prototype that is primarily for flight testing. They could've gone for a dummy IRST with equivalent weight distribution rather than waiting for an imported one.The lesson is not to trust these people with timelines.
UTTAM is fully Indian, who are we going to blame delays of it? martians ?.
One has to be serious dumbass to call indian IRST is "ready".
DRDO made a rational choice to import because they knew very well that it would take a long time to be ready. Imagine fully betting on UTTAM 5 years ago. Today, at least they can blame third-party proven radar for integration delays.
Its just for prototypes.
You mean to tell me that DRDO developed IRST system which was showcased first at Aero India 2025 isn't ready?The lesson is not to trust these people with timelines.
UTTAM is fully Indian, who are we going to blame delays of it? martians ?.
One has to be serious dumbass to call indian IRST is "ready".
DRDO made a rational choice to import because they knew very well that it would take a long time to be ready. Imagine fully betting on UTTAM 5 years ago. Today, at least they can blame third-party proven radar for integration delays.

The workmanship on the Tejas Mk1A is anything but shoddy.It's a DPSU and a monopoly. Everyone's job is secure regardless of how the company is perceived. The user has no choice but to come back again, regardless of the shoddy workmanship or even the risk of loss of life, because it is a monopoly.
What reputation?
Now, you are a special kind of stupid to make this kind of comment even after spending all these years on the forum.You mean to tell me that DRDO developed IRST system which was showcased first at Aero India 2025 isn't ready?
This IRST system was only unveiled to the general public after having successfully completed flight testing and a industry partner having been selected.
View attachment 51706
Now there were also reports that for the Tejas Mk2 prototypes, the IRST unit was sourced from Russia, and the delivery of this system was delayed which is holding up prototype completion.