Missiles are quite different from Humans. sustained 5-7G's of force is quite negligible to have any effect on equipment, you can see 2-4G's acceleration on accelerometers by just dropping them as momentary reactions. You would be surprised at the measurements of a motorcycle hitting a pothole at 40mph.
Supersonic speed and air friction has minimal effect on the missile or even on the aircraft itself by themselves. Reaction forces that the airframe sees on the account of stress due to the forces generated by the velocity and resultant lift/drag have fatigue effects on the control surface itself. But Velocity and friction by themselves have a negligible effect. Now looking at the ordinance and stress on it, given unlike the Airframe, they are not stress members they will have a negligible effect on the missile/bomb frame itself. Also, the control surface on the missile are extremely small and thus has minimal reaction forces on the frame.
Moisture is an interesting area, most of the effect of moisture actually happens on a unit when it is stationary at sea level. The biggest problem with moisture is of condensation and it can cause catastrophic failure on systems. In some systems, there are mitigation techniques such as service outlets for dry air blowouts, especially in targetting pods, refueling systems, even ground refueling vehicles. In most missiles effect of moisture depends on the design if the manufacturer calls for canisters for storage and Vac treatment and it's not stored in proper mechanism then there is possible degradation especially if the subsystem was not certified for high humidity operation. Fortunately in Indian Air Force, most Russian equipment goes through salt spray tests, rain tests, etc to be certified for their own use. All of this documentation is available to the procurement agencies. Even the paint that IAF uses for its aircraft and ordinance is fully certified.
So there is a very very low chance that there will be rapid degradation of the missile unit because it was on the fighter Jet.