Going by the tail code (LA5028), it looks like a FOC MK1. The 1st Mk1A tail code is LA5033 and the recently flown 2nd unit is LA5034. Plus, the positioning of the sensor/antenna on the tail (I don't know which sensor) has changed from MK1 to Mk1A.
Going by the tail code (LA5028), it looks like a FOC MK1. The 1st Mk1A tail code is LA5033 and the recently flown 2nd unit is LA5034. Plus, the positioning of the sensor/antenna on the tail (I don't know which sensor) has changed from MK1 to Mk1A.
BREAKING 🚨
— Livefist (@livefist) February 11, 2025
₹1.3 lakh crore order for 97 LCA Tejas Mk1A & 156 LCH Prachand to be placed in next 3-6 months: @HALHQBLR Chairman DK Sunil pic.twitter.com/qh4xo8Ia9G
MK1A is still not ready. Expected to start receiving not before 2025 year end as per latest inputs. That may be the reason IAF chief was pissed at HAL.5 Mk1A is ready.. isn't it better than all other jets except Rafale .. ( with opex lot less than Rafale , should be the work horse )
Place the order for additional 97 GE engines at the least..
with 24 annual rate + planned additional line (8) = 32 / year , initial order of 72 Mk1A + 10 trainers will be done in 3 years.
BREAKING 🚨
— Livefist (@livefist) February 11, 2025
₹1.3 lakh crore order for 97 LCA Tejas Mk1A & 156 LCH Prachand to be placed in next 3-6 months: @HALHQBLR Chairman DK Sunil pic.twitter.com/qh4xo8Ia9G
ASRAAM on LCA Tejas Mk1A on Dual Rack Pylon pic.twitter.com/6PFqTKbG33
— Defence Matrix (@Defencematrix1) February 11, 2025
View attachment 40382
View attachment 40383
Wasn't there a common launcher they were working on?Pylon for Astra has to be designed ?
Wasn't there a common launcher they were working on?
This is exactly what the IAF head was talking about when he said Mk1A is still not delivered. The Mk1A, which was discussed with IAF, is a complete package with missile firing capabilities with certification, not displaying a variety of missiles on the pylon of the Mk1A. Now I am not sure what HAL has confirmed to IAF. We know these BABUs have a bad habit of nodding their heads for everything. Hope they haven't confirmed adding nuclear bombs with MK1A
Being saying that since long. Once againWe should look for a podded IRST like Legion pod too. Without it MK1A may remain in a disadvantageous environment where all radio waves are jammed. J-10C will have a upper hand in that scenario.
This is exactly what the IAF head was talking about when he said Mk1A is still not delivered. The Mk1A, which was discussed with IAF, is a complete package with missile firing capabilities with certification, not displaying a variety of missiles on the pylon of the Mk1A. Now I am not sure what HAL has confirmed to IAF. We know these BABUs have a bad habit of nodding their heads for everything. Hope they haven't confirmed adding nuclear bombs with MK1A
No, I was quoting on the integration of missiles like Astra MK1/2 and JDAM and Hammer on the Tejas MK1A which are commited by HAL. These should be certified before the MK1A is delivered to the IAF. You are correct; the universal adapter was an IAF project, not HAL.From what I understand in those tweets India developed Pylon cum launcher for Su30 & Astra missile.
But not developed Pylon / launcher for Tejas,
For that they made a adaptor fixing the pylon cum launcher of Su series to Tejas pylon.
Universal launcher seems to be for Su series .