Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates
- Thread starter Shashank
- Start date
I have the same faith in Indian media as I had during their reporting of "Chinese Took our territory". Its usually misrepresentation based on some unknown sources. I will wait for official statements. The Indian choice of words is not looking very confident or even factual.
The problem is that Military is not meant for diplomacy. And we were doing that. Was bound to fail.
Start an artillery barrage and.see
How Hollow the Chinese are
This must be escalated
Also start bombing POK immediately
A good pakistani is a dead Pakistani
How Hollow the Chinese are
This must be escalated
Also start bombing POK immediately
A good pakistani is a dead Pakistani
BJP IT cell might have killed a few chinese and conveyed the same to news channels
Even if there are casualties on Chinese side will they accept? I don't think so After all they are biggest propaganda state than Pakistan.
Its not just congress and bjp it cells. Our media is perfectly capable of killing and reporting whole company of Chinese. On demand to boot.
if there were Chinese casualties then they would have started war by now. It's simple.
It is surender.
Casualties on both sides yet not the courage to disclose which Chinese pig was killed shows 27th Feb colour.
All this clown govt can do is talk, create problems and then get beat and shut up. We will take back Aksai Chin, bc first have the courage to disclose name and rank of Chinese, take Aksai Chin afterwards.
From what ?
They have SPHs and MBRLs up there.
We have maybe 2 batteries of M777 in service.
oops seems we have hit raw nerve some where the bully is throwing a tantrum.
Indian experts play with fire by challenging one-China principle
By Li Qingqing Source:Global Times Published: 2020/6/15 23:02:01
File Photo: Xinhua
Amid China-India border disputes, some Indian experts suggested that India should "rethink" the one-China principle at a webinar on Friday. Some hawkish Indian experts, including former Indian deputy national security adviser Arvind Gupta, raised the idea that India should support the "democratic movement" in Hong Kong, increase India's "economic and technological relations' with Taiwan, passively help people in Tibet "organize protests when Chinese leaders visit India," and reject joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership unless Hong Kong and Taiwan are made members.
Do these Indian experts think they have explored some policy leverage that New Delhi can use to counter China? Do they think they've found an Achilles' Heel of the mainland?
These strategic experts lack strategic vision. For example, the one-China principle is widely acknowledged by the international community and is also the prerequisite for establishing diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China. But some hawkish Indian experts and media outlets seem to want to crack it. These people are actually suggesting India play with fire by challenging China's bottom line. They have also underestimated China's resolve to maintain territorial integrity. They want to jeopardize China's core interests, but their illusionary views are unlikely to affect the Indian government's acknowledgement of the one-China principle.
India recognized the one-China principle as early as 1950 when the two countries established diplomatic relations. Challenging the one-China principle to provoke China will not prosper, but will only be detrimental to India's interests. The Indian government is expected not to let such negative sentiment sabotage China-India relations and intensify the two countries' disputes.
Governments of some countries used to provoke China on China's core interests, including Taiwan and Tibet questions. But, in the end, those governments would understand China's firm stance that it won't trade anything for its core interest of territorial integrity. China has enough will and ability to safeguard its core interests. Some Indian scholars should have a better understanding of it.
India itself is also troubled by separatist forces. In fact, many developing countries are facing the challenge of dealing with separatism. Indian strategic experts should have a deep understanding of this, rather than thinking of inciting separatism in other countries. With China's rise, some Indian experts' suspicions about China have also been growing. They need to have a candid dialogue with Chinese experts to deepen mutual understanding.
Indian experts play with fire by challenging one-China principle
By Li Qingqing Source:Global Times Published: 2020/6/15 23:02:01
File Photo: Xinhua
Amid China-India border disputes, some Indian experts suggested that India should "rethink" the one-China principle at a webinar on Friday. Some hawkish Indian experts, including former Indian deputy national security adviser Arvind Gupta, raised the idea that India should support the "democratic movement" in Hong Kong, increase India's "economic and technological relations' with Taiwan, passively help people in Tibet "organize protests when Chinese leaders visit India," and reject joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership unless Hong Kong and Taiwan are made members.
Do these Indian experts think they have explored some policy leverage that New Delhi can use to counter China? Do they think they've found an Achilles' Heel of the mainland?
These strategic experts lack strategic vision. For example, the one-China principle is widely acknowledged by the international community and is also the prerequisite for establishing diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China. But some hawkish Indian experts and media outlets seem to want to crack it. These people are actually suggesting India play with fire by challenging China's bottom line. They have also underestimated China's resolve to maintain territorial integrity. They want to jeopardize China's core interests, but their illusionary views are unlikely to affect the Indian government's acknowledgement of the one-China principle.
India recognized the one-China principle as early as 1950 when the two countries established diplomatic relations. Challenging the one-China principle to provoke China will not prosper, but will only be detrimental to India's interests. The Indian government is expected not to let such negative sentiment sabotage China-India relations and intensify the two countries' disputes.
Governments of some countries used to provoke China on China's core interests, including Taiwan and Tibet questions. But, in the end, those governments would understand China's firm stance that it won't trade anything for its core interest of territorial integrity. China has enough will and ability to safeguard its core interests. Some Indian scholars should have a better understanding of it.
India itself is also troubled by separatist forces. In fact, many developing countries are facing the challenge of dealing with separatism. Indian strategic experts should have a deep understanding of this, rather than thinking of inciting separatism in other countries. With China's rise, some Indian experts' suspicions about China have also been growing. They need to have a candid dialogue with Chinese experts to deepen mutual understanding.
Not really.. Full scale wars take more than that..
I have three questions.
1. by looking at the Chinese media and their MEA I don't think there were any casualties.
2. fight took place at night so how do we came to know about their casualties.
1. by looking at the Chinese media and their MEA I don't think there were any casualties.
2. fight took place at night so how do we came to know about their casualties.
Fu(k BJP, Congress communists and all politics for all we care. We have lost three soldiers, we fight for India only.
Answer is simple : We don't know. Chinese don't exactly put too much importance on lives of their own or others. Its impossible to know what has happened.
11 soldiers are injured on our side too is this a coincidence.
yeah , fiercely,strongly, powerfully.....etc but not quantifiable, enuf of playing with words.
All Adjectives no Objectives.