Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

What short sightedness?
This is the only government which has taken border infrastructure seriously. It was the previous lovely non-nationalist regime's which thought that the best strategy of fighting the Chinese is to have no infrastructure at all. The government can be critiqued after this drama is over similarly to how they were critiqued post Wuhan but whining as if we have already lost a war is just negative and not constructive at all.

During 2008 to 2014, 7270 metres long bridges were built, while 14,450 metres of bridges were built between 2014 and 2020. In the period between 2008 and 2014, roads of 3,610km were constructed on the border while 4,764kms of roads were built between 2014 and 2020
So overall higher amount of roads have been made how it short sightedness or weakness as many of the posters here are trying to prove??
The previous governments were horrid, blatantly anti nation.

This government isn't. But that doesn't make them stellar. They're surely the better of the lot but that's a bit like choosing which pig is less filthy to wrestle with.

I do not believe for a moment that there was Intelligence failure. Heck, amateurs could see things with free maps and GoI couldn't? It was a failure of decision making. All the Jhula action between Modi and Xi made the former too trusting of his Chinese paramour. The decision making lobby was just hoping for the best, while having confidence to fool the nation.

Those technological dinosaurs forgot the world has moved on while they're still stuck in their old modes to hoodwink public. Now not a single of their obfuscations wrt China can pass with people tearing them apart. Now they're in catch 22, they banked on good luck and Modi-Xi chum chum chumma and didn't even acquire weapons to fight. Now that they're caught buck naked in the headlight fleeing from their lover's window, they're running off to send riot gear, to Russia to get weapons.

If that's not short sightedness, what is?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AbRaj
A doubt here - you mean to say exported stuff are inferior to the 'real' stuff that RuAF uses?
Any details on what basis these exported stuff are inferior to ones we (may) have received now?
In that case, what ever we import, say, S400 will be inferior to what is used by the Russian air defence forces?
Yes. They always lower the specs for export. It has been their policy right from the days of USSR.

would the software in the Flanker's radar and the Firing computer be compatible with these AAMs or would that need tweaking- because if tweaking is needed, then that means that there needs to be extensive tests done before combat deployment.
No change needed.
 
We are getting these AAMs directly from Russian AF stock and they have a much longer range than what has been published by many. These are not export quality stuff but the real stuff operated by Russian AF.

Good news if true.

The Russians always downgrade everything for export.
 
A doubt here - you mean to say exported stuff are inferior to the 'real' stuff that RuAF uses?
Any details on what basis these exported stuff are inferior to ones we (may) have received now?
In that case, what ever we import, say, S400 will be inferior to what is used by the Russian air defence forces?

Yes, everything we import from Russia is heavily downgraded.

In missiles, the seeker, propulsion system and fuel are different. As is the software. In radars, some modes are locked or simply not available, the range and resolution are lower. Sometimes even the internal electronics are different, with inferior TWT, inferior processing etc. All electronics are more or less inferior as well, except for COTS. These are basically the most important reasons why Western systems are superior to Russian exports.

With battle tanks as well, the engine, armour, gun, barrel, shells etc are all significantly inferior to what the Russian Army uses. At least half a generation behind.

But at the same time, with the downgrades, even the cost comes down, which makes them competitive.

India does get some leeway, especially when we pay for the development ourselves and is not used by Russian forces themselves, like the Su-30, when it was introduced. But if there's something being used by the Russian forces that we need, then you can only get a downgraded export model. They like to keep their secrets.

The Americans downgrade a lot of stuff as well, like the P-8I is downgraded, with some hardware removed, some software restricted. The Abrams also comes with downgraded armour and firepower, but that's because they don't want to export their DU-related stuff.

China is apparently the worst. At least America and Russia downgrade what they already operate. The Chinese make entirely new stuff for exports instead, and those are generally very bad even when compared to Russian stuff.
 
would the software in the Flanker's radar and the Firing computer be compatible with these AAMs or would that need tweaking- because if tweaking is needed, then that means that there needs to be extensive tests done before combat deployment.

If the Russians have integrated new missiles with the Su-30SM, then it won't be a problem. Practically the same thing.

If they have done it on the Su-35, then there will be some minor tweaking necessary.

If they have done it on the PAK FA only, then it needs a lot of work.

But you can expect the Russians to have worked it out for the Flankers already, since they operate hundreds of them now and obviously need increased firepower. Even their security situation isn't all that good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vstol Jockey
Yes, everything we import from Russia is heavily downgraded.

In missiles, the seeker, propulsion system and fuel are different. As is the software. In radars, some modes are locked or simply not available, the range and resolution are lower. Sometimes even the internal electronics are different, with inferior TWT, inferior processing etc. All electronics are more or less inferior as well, except for COTS. These are basically the most important reasons why Western systems are superior to Russian exports.

With battle tanks as well, the engine, armour, gun, barrel, shells etc are all significantly inferior to what the Russian Army uses. At least half a generation behind.

But at the same time, with the downgrades, even the cost comes down, which makes them competitive.

India does get some leeway, especially when we pay for the development ourselves and is not used by Russian forces themselves, like the Su-30, when it was introduced. But if there's something being used by the Russian forces that we need, then you can only get a downgraded export model. They like to keep their secrets.

The Americans downgrade a lot of stuff as well, like the P-8I is downgraded, with some hardware removed, some software restricted. The Abrams also comes with downgraded armour and firepower, but that's because they don't want to export their DU-related stuff.

China is apparently the worst. At least America and Russia downgrade what they already operate. The Chinese make entirely new stuff for exports instead, and those are generally very bad even when compared to Russian stuff.

What about Rafale

Our Mirage 2000 I and Mig 29 UPG after Upgradation
Were called as the Best versions of themselves

And in case of Su 30 upgradation , why cannot we install whatever latest is available
 
You destroy G219 and Xinjiang and most Tibet will be seperated from the Han mainland. Retaking Gilgit Baltistan is not as dangerous to them as much as retaking Aksai China is sadly we ain't invading both of them for the foreseeable future...

But for that there has to be some initiative from both side. Chinese will protect their roads and Indians will do the same. Advantage for India is, they have heights and sitting in Mountain and can concentrate all resource at one sector more efficiently than Chinese.

Where as China is open in the plateau and have to repeatedly create stations to support the troops.

“If chess is about decisive battle, wei qui is about a protracted campaign and ‘strategic encirclement’ where opponents seek to occupy empty spaces and then surround and capture opposing pieces. While chess encourages single-mindedness, wei-qui generates guile and strategic flexibility.”

I have said several times, it's not just about Ladakh only, the strategic game is also on. India and China will also clash in 2nd and 3rd world countries too. It's a new world order in formation. The weight is again shifting toward Asia like ancient times.
 
But for that there has to be some initiative from both side. Chinese will protect their roads and Indians will do the same. Advantage for India is, they have heights and sitting in Mountain and can concentrate all resource at one sector more efficiently than Chinese.

Where as China is open in the plateau and have to repeatedly create stations to support the troops.

“If chess is about decisive battle, wei qui is about a protracted campaign and ‘strategic encirclement’ where opponents seek to occupy empty spaces and then surround and capture opposing pieces. While chess encourages single-mindedness, wei-qui generates guile and strategic flexibility.”

I have said several times, it's not just about Ladakh only, the strategic game is also on. India and China will also clash in 2nd and 3rd world countries too. It's a new world order in formation. The weight is again shifting toward Asia like ancient times.
You're forgetting the most important bit. India will have to be willing to fight for all this to happen.

I don't see the deluge of sinophobic content, or statements that should flood media to prepare public for any war. I see only limp noodle statements that is as passive as possible wrt China and a scampering GOI to buy shit they should have 5 summers ago.

Does any of that show any intention to fight?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AbRaj

AFTER 15 June , Both sides are Reinforcing their positions

Positions shown in this piture makes most sense. Indian positions in other side of Galwan river with supply lines open, facing chinese positions in the other side of river.



If Ajay Shukla cannot convince the people that Modi has "failed " ; he will loose Lakhs of Rupees in Payments from Congress

It will be a Kick on his Stomach :ROFLMAO:

AJay Shukla's claim of 1.5 KM incursion in Galwan valley is a joke. Only idiots will belive that. If you consider Chinese vehicle "X" lenth, the distance Chinese intruded is "8X"

So according to Shukla's scale, a Chinese vehicle is 1,500/8 = 187 meters long.. 🤣🤣


Even if those Chinese vehicle is 10 Meters long, At best Chinese incursion in Galwan valley is 80 Meters

PT12-new.jpg





That is a good position.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: STEPHEN COHEN