Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

Ghobbitses said:
Irony. You are actually a centrist. This forum has reputation of being extreme left wing/ commie den. In this place to give support to Modiji might make you right but being qualified it it makes you automatically a centrist.
Click to expand...
There is actually same number of rightists and leftist in this forum. But you only see what you want to see.

And I don't give any support to Modi, he is just another PM, and somewhat overhyped. I only give support to the nation. People want to think Modi as savior, that's their opinion.

But remember the same people also thought about the same about IG,RG and SG/MMS. when the congress won in 2004 whole country was celebrating. So its nothing new. We Indians are like that, we love to see our saviors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin, Volcano, Nikhil and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: Ghobbitses
screambowl said:
The event at galwan valley the lesson was taught by military but that's nothing compared to what Chinese have taught lesson to Indian leadership in 1962 by taking away whole Tibet and AksaiChin. Bhai kya keh rahy ho tum? Have even come close to doing that?
What you going to do with those bridges when you don't want to fight?

Pakistani Chinese and now the whole world knows, that you can't fight. Yeh har baar chooriya pehen kar aur gandhi ki dhoti pehen kar baith jatey ho. Sharam nahi ati?
Click to expand...

Sir, I think we need to wait for some more time to show what MSD will teach the Chene as well as their Iron Brothers ! Let us give them some more time !
 
_Anonymous_ said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1281308159752142855
Click to expand...


"However, if diplomacy fails, several precedents suggest that India’s attention may turn to an easily overlooked option: turning China’s tactics back on Beijing by advancing elsewhere along the disputed border, working around Chinese posts and patrols without firing a first shot. India can use the initiative and a measure of surprise to conduct such an operation. China would then confront the same dilemma now afflicting India alone: accept the encroachments or attack to reverse them? When Vietnam lost a 1988 skirmish with China over Johnson South Reef in the Spratly Islands, it seized several other features in the Spratly Islands in response. Hanoi could then regard the outcome as closer to a draw than an unalloyed defeat. This approach is inferior to a diplomatic breakthrough due to its risks, but its historical track record appears stronger than other options that rely on the use or threat of force."

"India’s employment of this strategy might also lay the groundwork for a mutual pullback deal to restore the status quo ante. When Greece seized the tiny Aegean islet of Imia in 1996, Turkey chose to occupy a nearby islet of its own rather than attack to eject the Greek marines. Both sides then mutually withdrew, restoring the status quo ante — an outcome that should interest India in Ladakh."


Seems killing by clubs & sticks is an old trick,

"However, there are precedents. For example, variously known as either the Poplar Tree Crisis or the Axe Murder Incident, a 1976 scuffle over an American attempt to trim a tree in the Korean Demilitarized Zone led to the deaths of two Americans at the hands of dozens of North Korean soldiers armed with clubs and axes. "
 
@vstol Jockey Do you think that the withdrawing chinese cowards have laid mines or some sort of AI and sensor and remotely triggered IEDs along the Galwan river beyond PT 14? And also at Gogra and Hot Springs?

IA should be cautious and should trap them at their own game. They would probably return to do the same act of July 15, but this time try to trap IA. Hope IA keeps this aspect as part of their strategy to trap the chinese.
 
Golden_Rule said:
@vstol Jockey Do you think that the withdrawing chinese cowards have laid mines or some sort of AI and sensor and remotely triggered IEDs along the Galwan river beyond PT 14? And also at Gogra and Hot Springs?

IA should be cautious and should trap them at their own game. They would probably return to do the same act of July 15, but this time try to trap IA. Hope IA keeps this aspect as part of their strategy to trap the chinese.
Click to expand...
It could be possible that they have laid the mines but IA will never go thru the valley in case it has to attack PLA. Even on LOC we have lots of landmines but when we need to cross, we do it easily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HariPrasad
vstol Jockey said:
It could be possible that they have laid the mines but IA will never go thru the valley in case it has to attack PLA. Even on LOC we have lots of landmines but when we need to cross, we do it easily.
Click to expand...
Basically it simply means that we never adopt the path which the enemy has laid out. Basic rule of military warfare.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: vstol Jockey
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom