Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

What if China offers them Double the Salary that India pays to Gorkha Soldiers

And what will be their battle cry in godless communist nation? Jai Mao Zodangli, ayo Gurkhali?

Close knit societies of Pakistan and China fear pluralism. They won't treat Gorkhas on same pedestal as their own supremacist ideologies i.e, Islam or the Red book. China and Pakistan view Nepali Gorkhas as mercenaries working for India but it's not. There is deep connection between Nepal & India and can't be subdued by a superficial arrangement.

China can hire Gorkhas in bulk but can it retain them and maintain same level of recruitment? Not easy.
 

While it's impossible for the Chinese to induct foreign troops in their own army, it's possible for China to help Nepal raise an army to attack India instead. Or at least act as a proxy to create divisions between India and Nepal. Kinda like what Syria is to Iran when it comes to dealing with Israel.

This will also push India to spend money on a force to counter Nepal, money that's needed on the Chinese front.
 
The PLA will neutralise the ‘predominance of the defence’ in high altitude terrain by not getting involved in “close infantry combat” over unfavourable terrain. If at all it chooses to use force, its pattern of attack will be driven by high-end technology with overwhelming use of PGMs, cyber and electronic warfare. The much romanticised ‘blood and guts’ close combat is a relic of the last century.

Depending on the military aim and level of operations, a PGM-based air and missile campaign may precede the ground attack along with cyber and electronic counter measures to neutralise the command and control systems of formations/units and weapon systems.


More in the article.

This is exactly why the army needs a robust and modern air defence system in order to neutralise their PGM capability. The Chinese can do all the cyber and electronic attacks they want, it's the PGMs and missiles, actual hard kill capability, that we really have to stop.

QRSAM can stop helicopters, PGMs and cruise missiles. MRSAM can do everything the QRSAM can do, and at higher altitudes, so even fighter jets, and also TBMs and SRBMs.

Without modern SAMs, the IA is going to be a sitting duck against modern PGMs.
 
The PLA will neutralise the ‘predominance of the defence’ in high altitude terrain by not getting involved in “close infantry combat” over unfavourable terrain. If at all it chooses to use force, its pattern of attack will be driven by high-end technology with overwhelming use of PGMs, cyber and electronic warfare. The much romanticised ‘blood and guts’ close combat is a relic of the last century.

Depending on the military aim and level of operations, a PGM-based air and missile campaign may precede the ground attack along with cyber and electronic counter measures to neutralise the command and control systems of formations/units and weapon systems.


More in the article.

This is exactly why the army needs a robust and modern air defence system in order to neutralise their PGM capability. The Chinese can do all the cyber and electronic attacks they want, it's the PGMs and missiles, actual hard kill capability, that we really have to stop.

QRSAM can stop helicopters, PGMs and cruise missiles. MRSAM can do everything the QRSAM can do, and at higher altitudes, so even fighter jets, and also TBMs and SRBMs.

Without modern SAMs, the IA is going to be a sitting duck against modern PGMs.
'Close combat is so last century ' - yeah thats why China is figthing with rods and sticks at LAC. The Print at its best.
 
'Close combat is so last century ' - yeah thats why China is figthing with rods and sticks at LAC. The Print at its best.
They resorted to close combat only because they knew they would catch IA unaware. Trust me, if there is any further escalation by China, its not going to be sticks and knives, or small arms for that matter. I'm not a fan of the Print but they nailed it this time.
 
They resorted to close combat only because they knew they would catch IA unaware. Trust me, if there is any further escalation by China, its not going to be sticks and knives, or small arms for that matter. I'm not a fan of the Print but they nailed it this time.

China will continue with salami slice. There is no reason for it to change its tactics.
 
Not now that Indians are prepared for it, they won't
They will just wait for things to cool down before doing the next slice. Like what happened after doklam. Today they have well made roads and proper infrastructure functiong there. All made after things went quiet.
 
and the price was a country in ruins- think about that.

Before US invasion , Afghanistan was already in ruins

Today Kabul and few other places are in much better shape than in 2001

However it is not about the condition of Afghanistan

It.is deliberately writing.articles against the Armed Forces Simply.for Political Agendas

Gen Panag and Col.Shukla are political party members

They are.following.the.diktats by their bosses to.show
Both the Govt.and the Army in a poor light ..

As if the Army does not understand.the
Importance.of Technology and Stand off weapons
 
Taliban just defeated the US.

US is the most technologically advanced military

They were defeated by AK 47s , RPGs and IEDs

They were not defeated. Their military objectives have already been achieved. What's happening now is simply the cost of an insurgency. If the US have the will, with enough boots on the ground they will have the ability to end it, but that's not a priority for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustCurious
They were not defeated. Their military objectives have already been achieved. What's happening now is simply the cost of an insurgency. If the US have the will, with enough boots on the ground they will have the ability to end it, but that's not a priority for them.

Indian Armed forces are Technologically million times superior than Taliban

And if Chinese had such overwhelming
Superiority then they would started
Their Offensive
 
  • Like
Reactions: RajibJ
They were not defeated. Their military objectives have already been achieved. What's happening now is simply the cost of an insurgency. If the US have the will, with enough boots on the ground they will have the ability to end it, but that's not a priority for them.

But with Taliban's return guaranteed, US envoy (as well as Group of 7) negotiating & dealing to Taliban exclusively & suggesting India to talk to Taliban, does it looks the US objectives were really met ?

Northern Alliance govt's writ runs around just Kabul valley, if the grapevine is correct. The South & East have always been owned by Taliban, where IS-K module has recently made inroads, thanks to Taliban's Pakhtoon-wali policy of hosting & providing safe sanctuaries to its biradars terrorists.

It's inscrutable to me & to US taxpayers what has US really achieved in Af-stan. The MIC made moolah though, throughput, they always do.