Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates


Is there an equivalent of this from Chinese side?

globaltimes.cn/content/1200588.shtml

In the five-point consensus, Wang and Jaishankar agreed that China and India should follow the guidance of the consensus reached between leaders of the two countries, including that divergence should not be escalated into conflicts. The current conflicts in border areas do not serve the interests of either side. The border troops of the two countries should continue their current dialogue, disengage as soon as possible, maintain necessary distances and ease the current tensions.

So atleast the text seems common.

Honestly, there is NO de-escalation plan in this. There are no promises from either side. BUT given the fact that we are dealing with China and the kind of people who run the show in South block, India may over-compensate the de-escalation. Hopefully it does not but given our historical actions in Dokhlam and in conflict with Pakistan, I won't be surprised if we do so.

If we keep the military pressure intact and support it by diplomacy -- like showing conversation but not agreeing to anything unless China agrees to go back to the position before start of this year, then it may make sense. Lets see how it goes... I have an inkling that we are seeing another Dokhlam in making.

Continued....

If I were China I would just hit some place on border with shells or something similar, kill few soldiers and blame India for violating its promises. Either India will be forced to back down or will be forced to fight. Given I am confident of my victory, both scenarios suite me. It will run Modi's nose in ground and will ensure he faces domestic political pressure as well.

I do wonder what India has to gain with such kind of declaration though. May be Jayshankar does not want to come back from Moscow empty handed.
 
Last edited:
If I were China I would just hit some place on border with shells or something similar, kill few soldiers and blame India for violating its promises.
You would be a megalomaniac to commit to such acts. Why did you not do it during Doklam? Why do you think you can do such act now. You are destined for a major loss!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78
You would be a megalomaniac to commit to such acts. Why did you not do it during Doklam? Why do you think you can do such act now. You are destined for a major loss!
And you don't think Chinese are not megalomaniac? Actually scratch that, you don't think that Chinese leadership NEEDS to be a megalomaniac?

"I" won't do it during Doklam because US was not as crippled. Because India did not have a covid crisis at hand. And because "I" didn't need it back then as much. Lastly, "I" did not know India leadership's reaction that well. Now "I" know that Indian leadership has very less apetite to defence -- even if it is against a small country like Nepal.

Ofcourse, "I" look down upon India, hasn't that been painfully obvious for so long? "I" also NEED to look down upon India, otherwise how will "I" convince my people to keep on accepting a practical dictatorship willingly?
 


 
I rarely agree with Ajay Shukla....... But then i found this article quite interesting...... and Most probably what India is currently doing....

It's such a defeatist article though. I hope we can successfully defend against these bat eaters. I think we are underestimating us too much vis-a-vis the Chinese. In 1962 we had a delusional Prime minister with no political will or understanding of geopolitics. The army was mistreated by the establishment our soldiers were barely equipped and barely supported. They were outnumbered by a factor of 8. The army leadership itself was compromised by coward and political appointed officers. I really don't understand how 1962 can be taken as a judgement on IA's Warfighting capabilities. We could have defeated them in 1962 itself had we had the foresight and political will and to see China as an enemy until we don't do that no amount of defense will help us protect against the Chinese. Our political establishment has to see the Chinese with as much disgust and contempt as we see the Pakistanis...
 
And you don't think Chinese are not megalomaniac? Actually scratch that, you don't think that Chinese leadership NEEDS to be a megalomaniac?

"I" won't do it during Doklam because US was not as crippled. Because India did not have a covid crisis at hand. And because "I" didn't need it back then as much. Lastly, "I" did not know India leadership's reaction that well. Now "I" know that Indian leadership has very less apetite to defence -- even if it is against a small country like Nepal.

Ofcourse, "I" look down upon India, hasn't that been painfully obvious for so long? "I" also NEED to look down upon India, otherwise how will "I" convince my people to keep on accepting a practical dictatorship willingly?
Why do you want to take the Nepalese so seriously? Duterte literally shat on the Americans, did the Americans suddenly become antagonistic against them?? No they waited it out and the situation changed so much that duterte himself asked Americans to help Philippines.
You don't waste your time on reacting every statement said by every small country. Nepal can't do much on ground the Nepalese Army is pro-India and most of communist party of nepal is a peasant force which will be easily crushed. This is all just a drama those bahadur's think they can do to trouble India. They can't do this with China. So don't worry too much...
Though one place we need to flex our muscle is against turkey. Turdogan is too talkative for his own good. We will have to cut him down to size.
 
Could recommend Any good stuff online about occultism in communism?? I thought only Nazis were involved in occultism. And those globalists type of people...
OK will try to post some links in the astrology thread. A small titbit which not many many people know is that Karl marx was a jew. His full name was Karl marx levi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolwa
The point which to be noted here is how Israelis were brought in to the table thru a war and resulted in a permanent solution.......
But the Israelis won even though they had to do a treaty which means it was on their terms. On the other hand if the Chinese win they won't deal with us like Israelis because they are the aggressors. The Yom Kippur was essentially defensive for the Israelis not the Arabs. This is typical manipulation of history to suit the agenda. We are in the position of Israel not the Arabs who were out to destroy Jewish existence.

We need to beat the Chinese extremely badly so that they cannot look us in the eye for the next 10 years. Which should give us enough space to modernise. The Chinese don't want a permanent solution they aren't looking for it. They want to continue the congress era status quo where the glorious Hans seize an area and low IQ Ahsan's leave the area cowering in fear on seeing there glorious golden bodies. They don't want an endgame.
Ajai shukla is congress stooge which makes him a defeatist essentially. Pravin Sawhney will make more sense than this buffoon..
OK will try to post some links in the astrology thread. A small titbit which not many many people know is that Karl marx was a jew. His full name was Karl marx levi.
OTT but he was related to the Rothschilds that much I know..
 
Last edited: