Line of Actual Control (LAC) : India & Tibet Border Updates

Its a typical mainland Indian thingy. Not all but many of them. I am also hindu but there are things in mainland Indians which I find completely alien and had a lot of difficulty trying to understand and deal with as I was growing up.
If it's fine with you, can you tell from which region you come from, North-east region or island areas? Thank you.
 

This HINDI newspaper claiming that
Four NAVY officials visited Pangong Lake for
Strategising
Jagran is considered right wing news paper while Amar Ujala is considered left centre there.
 
@Arsalan123 @safriz
left behind those 3 military vehicles a duplicate copy of Hummers as Trophy...😁😁😂😂
EZUOxv7XsAIy0To.jpeg
EZUOxHRXkAE0dqP.jpeg
EZUOuzUWsAMEd_U.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If we keep political will aside,given the fact that weapons are not allowed on lac currently,those who are in greater number will beat the other side.if nothing happens and only fistfight occurs Chinese are doomed ,release few videos and all their attitude will vaporize.

Who knows with in a few months ham unhe utha Kar lac ke usss side rakh ke chod aaenge.

But I liked their vehicle ,we should also have similar proper military vehicle like Hummer copy ,what's stopping us ??

It will be great for psyops , especially on Bangladesh ,Nepal and Myanmar border also.there should be a difference between our army and theirs.
 
PeeDFk is like Just For Laugh TV show for us.
Whenever we are bored and we need to laugh we just visit there. And I just want to say people there never disappoint us, they do provide us Lots of Laughs.....😁😁😂😂😜😜
What are you on about?
The pictures you posted are from various websites.

The YouTube video you linked shows an injured Indian soldiers lying on the ground and a Chinese armoured vehicle being attacked with sticks by Indian soldiers.
What's the point of that ?
😲
 
Tell me wether we really lost territory to Chinese,lot of twitter accounts some Indian members of other forums all some what agreeing that.
There is limited information available in public domain. My understanding is that the areas which are inside Indian LAC are effectively Indian and ruled historically. Beyond that region was effectively ruled by past Chinese empires. Indian side king were able to win and rule only upto Laddakh region stably. They tried to cross into Tibbet ruled areas but were beaten back. Hence in my understanding we don't have historical claims over the Aksai Chin area. However dispute arose when sikh empire lost war to British empire, and British wanted to draw the ruled areas border due to fear of Russian king state. They had redrawn the border map which put Aksai Chin inside Sikh protecterate, part of British empire. This map was presented to Chinese officials but never agreed. Based on the new British map, sikh empire laid claim to Aksai Chin region, but important to note, neither British nor Sikh empire tried to rule Aksai Chin area till freedom of India. This map was updated in British empire map. Then after few years, British again revised the map and in new map Aksai Chin region was placed inside Chinese empire. This was again presented to Chinese authorities, who again didn't reply. This time however British didn't encorporate the changes in maps. Post freedom, we adopted the existing British map which placed Aksai Chin area inside India's international border. We occasionally sent patrols but didn't commit to full scale base or permanent camp there. By 1951 Chinese had started building highway which was completed by 1957. And then our one of patrols noted this development and communicated to top administration. We sent soldiers and Chinese attacked and reached upto finger 4 area in one sector, however vacated some areas but still retained finger 8 and the old fort & consolidated. Between finger 4 & finger 8 lies the area which is contested by both sides and remained unadministered by either side. Chinese have built a motorable road almost upto finger 4 this year which broke the 1996 agreement (please correct the year if wrong) status quo understanding. Rest most probably everybody knows what happened afterwards.

Going by this information, which is again my personal view, we haven't lost any areas practically, however theoretically we indeed lost the areas which we didn't administor despite being inside theoretical Indian international border. We lost good men by solely depending on British map and not taking actual situation in consideration in 1962. Thank you.
 
Omg! That thread! As if IA put petrol and set these fanboys @$$ on fire.

They were not crying this much when Balakot happened, but after their sugar daddy got put in place their heart is broken. Non stop wailing.
I visited PDF few hours after Trump speech,yet no thread on USA sanction on China . similarly nothing for the hongkong riot.

It does look like PDF too has become colony of China like their country Pakistan.

Anything on China and they will delete /edit it.we know for a fact that CNN's live feed of Trump speech was cut short the moment it started talking about hongkong.
 
The YouTube video you linked shows an injured Indian soldiers lying on the ground and a Chinese armoured vehicle being attacked with sticks by Indian soldiers.
And Indian soldiers(police) will kick Indian soldier on ground?

Seems like Video has quite a deep impact on you, not that you people are good at reasoning to begin with but deaf and blind too?
 
What do our troops lack.

Our problem was Roads and Logistics

That is what we are.doing which the Chinese are opposing

Infact all along the Ladakh front we should indulge in such rioting

It will force them to open fire

Because Let us accept it

We will not fire first


No Posting PDF links is not allowed

You visit PDF , the thread is going hyper
Somebody has mentioned your name over there
 
The simple one word answer is : YES, we have lost territory to China in Laddakh.

Details are :
1. It happened in 1962 and in a way in 1993, 96.
2. We did not agree to even a line of control or status quo till 1993. After that we agree to "line of actual control" but never defined what it was. Internationally, this lead to the position taken by China in 1960, which the achieved in 1962 militarily as line of actual control.
3. There is very little permanent presence of any side in that territory lost, so it is not comparable to say Gilgit Batlistan. Tomorrow, if Indian Army marches in that area, for most parts they will meet some modest resistance from China and march in vast emptiness.

Rules of engagement.

Actually the guy is not wrong when he says "Aksai chin freed in a day". Most part is simple open emptiness.
Answer lies in the historical facts. Was AksaiChin region ever administored by INDIA based empires in totality? My knowledge says, no. Aksai Chin was placed inside Indian border by British empire to secure from Russian Kingsley state in one of map. Another British map placed it in Chinese empire. We chose the map in which our borders were most spread even if not administored ever by Indian Central athority. Our PM said once we will not leave our one inch of land there, but when Chinese sent the forces and beat us back in Laddakh region, he said, it's barren land where even grass doesn't grow. Correct me on this statement of not correct. He said this because people of that time were aware it wasn't our land, however as we chose the map for our country, then it would be loosing face if we go back from what we called our border. After loosing our good men, it became a quagmire from which Indian political class never really recovered. Most of current generation doesn't read the historical documents or treaties, maps etc which clears lot of confusion, if not all. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia