Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning and F-22 'Raptor' : News & Discussion

Reminds me of how the UAE rejected the Rafale in 2008. If they're using the same playbook, they'll buy the F-35 in 2034.

Remember they currently operate both F-16 and Mirage 2000 -- and they weren't early adopters of either type, but they waited until they could get a massively upgraded version (F-16 block 60, Mirage 2000-9). It would be fitting if they did the same thing here.

They may be aiming for the one with the AETP. It will also give the Israelis the 15-year operational advantage they desire.
 
UAE suspend purchase of 50 f-35 + drone for 23 billion dollars compare to 80 rafales for 14 billion dollars
It seems UAE haven't like to be taken as stupid people.
 
Last edited:

UAE suspends talks on F-35 deal with US


UAE suspends talks on F-35 deal with US

The US is hopeful that it can work out any “outstanding issues” with the UAE over a $23 billion arms deal, a State Department official said Tuesday, after an Emirati official said his country was suspending talks on the sale of F-35 fighter jets.


“As we recently confirmed at the Dubai Air Show, the Biden-Harris Administration remains committed to the proposed sales of F-35 aircraft, the MQ-9B, and munitions even as we continue consultations to ensure that we have a clear, mutual understanding of Emirati obligations and actions before, during, and after delivery,” the official told Al Arabiya English.


Initially struck under the Trump administration, the UAE had requested to buy the US fighter jet and other weapons, including armed drones, as part of the Abraham Accords deal, which saw the Emirates normalize ties with Israel.


But the Biden administration’s decision to review all foreign arms sales, including this deal, led to increased skepticism.


While visiting the Dubai Air Show last month, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regional Security Mira Resnick said the US intended to move forward with the proposed defense sales.

On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal first reported that an Emirati official informed Washington of the suspension of talks over the deal. “Technical requirements, sovereign operational restrictions, and the cost/benefit analysis led to the reassessment,” the official was quoted as saying in a statement.

Asked to comment on the UAE’s new stance, the State Department official told Al Arabiya English: “We are hopeful that we can work through any outstanding issues, and we look forward to the US-UAE Joint Military Dialogue later this week.”

Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland was in the UAE last week to discuss “and advance key regional security and economic issues,” the State Department said before her trip.

Commenting on the UAE’s decision, Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby told reporters that Washington would try to work out the differences.

Kirby said that senior UAE officials had a visit scheduled to the Pentagon later this week.

“We will always insist, as a matter of statutory requirements and policy, on a variety of end use requirements,” Kirby said, directing questions to the State Department.

The UAE’s use of China’s Huawei 5G technologies and its warm relationship with China has irked the US, American officials have said publicly and privately.

And Chinese construction at UAE naval ports also raised questions from Washington about Beijing’s military ambitions at the site.

A diplomatic advisor to the UAE President, Anwar Gargash, said last week that the UAE ordered the halting of construction at a port near Abu Dhabi.

He said the UAE did not think the construction was being carried out for military purposes by China.
 
WASHINGTON and DUBAI: The United Arab Emirates has put a halt to a $23.3 billion deal with the US for F-35 stealth fighters, MQ-9 Reaper drones and a package of weapons, with a UAE source telling Breaking Defense the discussions have been “suspended” indefinitely for a “full reassessment” of the arms agreement.

On Monday, a UAE air force official sent a letter to the Pentagon withdrawing its letters of offer and acceptance for 50 Lockheed Martin F-35A fighters, 18 General Atomics MQ-9Bs, and $10 billion worth of air-to-air and air-to-ground munitions made largely by Raytheon.
***
Specifically, the US opposes the UAE’s contract with Chinese 5G provider Huawei, fearing that the Chinese network could technologically compromise the F-35. It also has concerns about what it believes may be a Chinese military facility built at a UAE port, and questions whether Abu Dhabi could protect US military technologies while working so closely with China.

The UAE’s withdrawal from the agreement comes a day after Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett met with UAE Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed on Monday, and mere weeks after the country inked a $19 billion deal with France for 80 Dassault Rafale fighters.
 
I don't believe tenders come under FMS deals.

Confirmed! Finland also chose the Lockheed Martin F-35
A notable number of additional products and services to be procured simultaneously are related to the acquisition of the combat system and its use. These include the sustainment system, which includes test equipment, tooling, assembly services and replaceable spare parts, as well as information systems, training systems and services, mission support systems and related services, and administrative services related to the U.S. Government’s Foreign Military Sales (FMS) acquisition process.
 

Yep, it's generally a mix of DCS and FMS.

The Apache proposal for India includes both a Direct Commercial Sale (DCS) component and a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) component. The FMS contract for the Apache includes munitions, training, aircraft certification, and components including engines, Electro-Optic (EO sensors) and the Fire Control Radar (option). The DCS portion of the contract primarily consists of the aircraft (less engines/sensors), logistic support, spares and services.

The F-35 itself is gonna be DCS.
 
The prospect of seeing 23 billion USD flying away seems to have put the fear of God in the Americans. UAE sure has learnt the art of squeezing American balls.
 

Damage control being done, I suppose.

Anyway--
"We've wanted to make sure, for example, that our commitment to Israel's qualitative military edge is assured, so we wanted to make sure that we could do a thorough review of any technologies that are sold or transferred to other partners in the region, including the UAE," Blinken said.

Yeah, UAE is not the problem, Iran is. They recently changed their oil price formula, which means Iran's gonna get oil money again. The US needs to stop making excuses when arming countries that are actually important for dealing with Iran. And the Israelis should be more concerned about Turkey and Egypt getting the F-35.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMD
I sincerely hope the Emiratis aren't using the French deal as some sort of bargaining chip with the US only to ditch the French once they've reached favourable terms with the US for I find the notion of spending 43 billion USD for defence procurements on the part of the UAE in the next decade a huge overkill given their limited defence requirements.

Moreover much as the UAE may desire to project power in the larger ME region given their intervention in Yemen , Ethiopia , Libya , Syria , etc as of now their principle concern lies across the Persian Gulf in Iran .
No. It's simply time to change M2000 fleet and in a couple of years time to change F16-60 fleet. Nothing more.
I add that UAE have seen how the US may intervene in their military operations when the F16 fleet was grounded by uncle Sam during the 2011 Lybia operations.... so USA is a political ally you need to have in your hand when France give you free use weapons.
So UAE will rely on french Rafale, with or without flying turkey 35.
 
For Turkey it's now a cold case.

Yep, the Turks were stopped cold Turkey.

For Egypt, the vast russian fleet (with the russian specialists for maintenance) will prevent a F35 purchase.

The new Russian fleet is not that difficult to maintain. The new Mig-29 has reduced spares and maintenance costs by 80% compared to the original. The Su-35 has parts that last twice as long as the original Flanker. Both are more or less comparable to Western costs today. Especially with that insane exchange rate advantage with Russia. But the Egyptians are getting GCC funding. As long as the F-35 becomes available to the ME, they will all jump at the chance.
 
Yep, it's generally a mix of DCS and FMS.

The Apache proposal for India includes both a Direct Commercial Sale (DCS) component and a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) component. The FMS contract for the Apache includes munitions, training, aircraft certification, and components including engines, Electro-Optic (EO sensors) and the Fire Control Radar (option). The DCS portion of the contract primarily consists of the aircraft (less engines/sensors), logistic support, spares and services.

The F-35 itself is gonna be DCS.
If I were an American in charge of the Finnish contract, I would have put everything under FMS. F-35s at $73 million, when you see how much they would be sold to the UAE, are very dangerous under DCS. Especially if you have to change the engine to make the block 4 work ! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amarante

Est-ce finalement ‘Rafale’ vs JSF ?

Is it finally 'Rafale' vs JSF?

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)


"Speaking at a press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Antony Blinken said that Washington needed to conduct some reviews [regarding the UAE/F-35 deal]."

"We wanted to make sure that our commitment to Israel's military advantage is assured, we also wanted to make sure that we could do a thorough review of any technologies that are sold or transferred to other partners in the region, including the UAE," the US secretary of state said."

"Nevertheless, we are prepared to move forward if the Emirates decide to pursue these projects," he added.

Everything happens, in this symbolically and strategically important affair, as if the US were suggesting that it was they who temporarily withdrew, or reconsidered their offer, depending on one or other very classic polemical aspect: "spying" by UAE-friendly China, which is only thinking of copying the exceptional machine; displeasure by Israel, which wants to keep this jewel that terrorises the skies for itself and no one else in the region, and demands draconian limitations on the pseudo-Emirates F-35.

Notwithstanding these various elephants in the china shop, the US side adds that it is ready to resume negotiations. The UAE rushes to assure that they are still friends with the US, and very privileged, etc. In short, everyone embraces each other, but the fact remains that they don't really get along, if not really at all, - with furious anger on the UAE side at the US demands, with complete astonishment on the US side that they could refuse "such" an offer for "such" a wonder.

On the other hand, as we have seen, and in an attempt to give us a taste of truth-of-situation, it will be repeated that it was indeed the Emiratis who broke off the negotiations, particularly dissatisfied with the US conditions. The most important reason given was 'sovereign operational restrictions'. The Emiratis, who according to the French have long possessed exceptional technological skills, have always been very jealous of their operational independence and at the same time they quickly understood the kind of restrictions that were being imposed on them. They realised, during various interventions, that they did not have this independence and that, by various means of electronic control, the USA remained able to prohibit any operation that they did not like.

There were various demonstrations of this. Intervening notably alongside the Egyptians in anti-terrorist strike operations in Libya, they have always been forced not to use their most advanced aircraft, - F-16 Block 60s, or F-16Es, a very advanced model of the F-16, - preferring their Mirage 2000-9s, which they have complete control over, in accordance with French customs and traditions.

[...]

The question therefore arises as to how this affair will evolve, which is described as "unprecedented by the vigour of the Emiratis' refusal" (confidence verbatim), and this refusal having left the Americanist clowns stunned (how can one refuse...?). It remains to be seen whether the US, realising the situation, will not exert the crazy pressure and irresponsible brutality that it now puts into all such acts. Nevertheless, the current situation could be interpreted as a kind of "indirect victory" of the Rafale over the F-35, with prospects for further orders if the UAE persists in its heroic refusal. For the moment, the US has not really taken notice of the 'Rafale' order and what it might mean. (The US SystemPress is full of long articles on the UAE's folly in not wanting the F-35, where one can hardly find any mention of the sale of the 80 'Rafales').
 
If I were an American in charge of the Finnish contract, I would have put everything under FMS. F-35s at $73 million, when you see how much they would be sold to the UAE, are very dangerous under DCS. Especially if you have to change the engine to make the block 4 work ! :)

Escaping from the FMS is the point of tenders. UAE's deal will come under FMS, and they will pay big bucks to make it happen, but all the global tenders with the F-35 participating are meant to force the Americans to negotiate.
 
Perhaps we have given the USA a performance like the one they gave us in the AUKUS case.

:ROFLMAO: ;):ROFLMAO:

UAE will buy the F-35 eventually anyway.

Honestly, I think you should be more worried about the Rafale vs SH competition in India. The Rafale failed to meet the Finnish price threshold, while the SH did. And that could repeat in India. I don't think the IN capability requirements will be as stringent as Finland's either. The Mig-29K is a very sh!tty benchmark after all, no different from the Hornet.