This also translate as F-35 can't do also without help from the army (HIMARS, CAESAR) or from satellites.this translate as the Rafale can't do SEAD
Read well the text everywhere it is about joint operation, inter-army, shared datas ...
This also translate as F-35 can't do also without help from the army (HIMARS, CAESAR) or from satellites.this translate as the Rafale can't do SEAD
Yes in the same way we rely on rafale but for the future we have to rely on joint operations.where did i say the F-35 did full SEAD?. It comes in block 4. We rely on our growlers and super hornets, AARGM / ER
It is unbelievable the power of nuisance you have, we wonder if you have a brain or if you are a bot of poor quality only capable of repeating the same thing over and over again and inaccessible to reasoning.Poor Patrick, his message box will be full. from the fanboys telling him to stop saying the truth..We want to spread BS all over the internet....
this translate as the Rafale can't do SEAD
https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/cicde/20220722-CEIA-3.6.4_SEAD-VF.pdf
"The wars of the future will undoubtedly be fought in a hybrid confrontation environment37 . The idea that using a few weapons specifically dedicated to antiradar can then allow to operate in complete freedom is now over. The possibility of severe losses if the different components do not plan a true joint operation is therefore very high. Each branch and domain must operate in coordination to achieve the campaign objectives. In other words, the interoperability of SEAD operations is a prerequisite for any future high-intensity campaign Given current military skills, the two main categories of targeting (lethal and non-lethal) must be addressed in describing capabilities.SEAD currently possible"
Do F5 version will have any engine & Radar upgrade? And is it possible to upgrade F3R/F4.2 to F5 version later?It is unbelievable the power of nuisance you have, we wonder if you have a brain or if you are a bot of poor quality only capable of repeating the same thing over and over again and inaccessible to reasoning.
Because your quote is the perfect counter-example to what you want to demonstrate, the weapons specifically dedicated to anti radar that are criticized in your quote are the weapons used by the US, which the French abandoned last century and which were replaced by non-specific weapons! !!
And what you put in bold is the French doctrine, already in application with the Rafale, so thank you for quoting again the text that I had quoted myself to demonstrate how far ahead the Rafale was in doing SEAD in today's complex environments, and how useless AGM88 type missiles were in this context.
F5 is not defined yet.Do F5 version will have any engine & Radar upgrade? And is it possible to upgrade F3R/F4.2 to F5 version later?
Poor Patrick, his message box will be full. from the fanboys telling him to stop saying the truth..We want to spread BS all over the internet....
this translate as the Rafale can't do SEAD
https://www.defense.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/cicde/20220722-CEIA-3.6.4_SEAD-VF.pdf
"The wars of the future will undoubtedly be fought in a hybrid confrontation environment37 . The idea that using a few weapons specifically dedicated to antiradar can then allow to operate in complete freedom is now over. The possibility of severe losses if the different components do not plan a true joint operation is therefore very high. Each branch and domain must operate in coordination to achieve the campaign objectives. In other words, the interoperability of SEAD operations is a prerequisite for any future high-intensity campaign Given current military skills, the two main categories of targeting (lethal and non-lethal) must be addressed in describing capabilities.SEAD currently possible"
Except the Rafale can't do SEAD..It can only do DEAD when it is able to. There aren't many 1960's SAMs operating.Yes in the same way we rely on rafale but for the future we have to rely on joint operations.
Is there a translation error for you? Or is it an english thing. I used google on the airdefense website. Deepl is suppose to be better, if you want to do your own to hindi from the PDF.That quote dismisses your own argument.
"The idea that using a few weapons specifically dedicated to antiradar can then allow to operate in complete freedom is now over"Is there a translation error for you? Or is it an english thing. I used google on the airdefense website. Deepl is suppose to be better, if you want to do your own to hindi from the PDF.
It said SEAD stopped years ago. the rafale can't do it. They have to try use joint forces, to try and do sams. good luck, without the basics. The truth is from their politician. They are going to rely on NATO for SEAD.
Is there a translation error for you? Or is it an english thing. I used google on the airdefense website. Deepl is suppose to be better, if you want to do your own to hindi from the PDF.
It said SEAD stopped years ago. the rafale can't do it. They have to try use joint forces, to try and do sams. good luck, without the basics. The truth is from their politician. They are going to rely on NATO for SEAD.
It's you misunderstanding... The French can't do it now. They don't even have an anti-radar missile. They say freedom is over."The idea that using a few weapons specifically dedicated to antiradar can then allow to operate in complete freedom is now over"
@randomradio is correct.
Wow talk about mental gymnastics... still I give them a 5 out of 10.It's you misunderstanding... The French can't do it now. They don't even have an anti-radar missile. They say freedom is over.
But wait...They have said they want to SEAD again in F5 for SEAD/DEAD. freedom restored.
It's a game of leapfrog, as SAMs improve and aircraft improve to counter. You use every trick in the book.
SU-30
"The potential purchase of the DRDO-developed Rudram Anti-Radiation Missile (ARM) by the Indian Air Force also demonstrates the significance that the SEAD/DEAD missions have come to have along India’s frontiers.
Air Chief Marshal VR Chaudhari recently stated that the Indian Air Force would concentrate on introducing “made-in-India weapons” in light of the lessons learned from the Ukraine-Russian conflict.
Ukraine’s efforts to halt the Russian onslaught have significantly benefited from the military hardware hastily delivered by the US and other western nations. The American HARM missile (anti-radar) has struck out among them for its capacity to destroy Russian radars and has grown to be a significant nuisance for the Russian forces."
Your SU-30 does SEAD/DEAD
Growler and super hornet does SEAD/DEAD
F-16 weasel does SEAD/DEAD
Etcetera, should we make a complete list?
That's because French doctrine is slightly different. Planes evolve, threats evolve and so does strategy and tactics. If French want Rafale to evolve then why are you so against it, is beyond me?It's you misunderstanding... The French can't do it now. They don't even have an anti-radar missile. They say freedom is over.
But wait...They have said they want to SEAD again in F5 for SEAD/DEAD. freedom restored.
It's a game of leapfrog, as SAMs improve and aircraft improve to counter. You use every trick in the book.
SU-30
"The potential purchase of the DRDO-developed Rudram Anti-Radiation Missile (ARM) by the Indian Air Force also demonstrates the significance that the SEAD/DEAD missions have come to have along India’s frontiers.
Air Chief Marshal VR Chaudhari recently stated that the Indian Air Force would concentrate on introducing “made-in-India weapons” in light of the lessons learned from the Ukraine-Russian conflict.
Ukraine’s efforts to halt the Russian onslaught have significantly benefited from the military hardware hastily delivered by the US and other western nations. The American HARM missile (anti-radar) has struck out among them for its capacity to destroy Russian radars and has grown to be a significant nuisance for the Russian forces."
Your SU-30 does SEAD/DEAD
Growler and super hornet does SEAD/DEAD
F-16 weasel does SEAD/DEAD
Etcetera, should we make a complete list?
It's you misunderstanding... The French can't do it now. They don't even have an anti-radar missile. They say freedom is over.
But wait...They have said they want to SEAD again in F5 for SEAD/DEAD. freedom restored.
It's a game of leapfrog, as SAMs improve and aircraft improve to counter. You use every trick in the book.
SU-30
"The potential purchase of the DRDO-developed Rudram Anti-Radiation Missile (ARM) by the Indian Air Force also demonstrates the significance that the SEAD/DEAD missions have come to have along India’s frontiers.
Air Chief Marshal VR Chaudhari recently stated that the Indian Air Force would concentrate on introducing “made-in-India weapons” in light of the lessons learned from the Ukraine-Russian conflict.
Ukraine’s efforts to halt the Russian onslaught have significantly benefited from the military hardware hastily delivered by the US and other western nations. The American HARM missile (anti-radar) has struck out among them for its capacity to destroy Russian radars and has grown to be a significant nuisance for the Russian forces."
Your SU-30 does SEAD/DEAD
Growler and super hornet does SEAD/DEAD
F-16 weasel does SEAD/DEAD
Etcetera, should we make a complete list?
The viewpoint of an Indian soldier:I'm not against it, I'm all for it. They are an ally and we may depend on them. It's the fanboy BS and the rest of the post with your BS, that gets annoying. Although Ukraine is just sticking on a missile, firing it and hoping for the best. There is a lot done on the plane, before it is fired that counts. Your SU would need stuff. to use the missile properly.
He never heard of AEW&C? It would be the same for most aircraft. I stopped reading there, but I'm sure he went on to sing the praise of the Rafale, even though SEAD doesn't come till F5. I think it is working well for Indian defence. They may have different plans for SEAD on their Rafale and including their SU SEAD capability.Former IAF chief BS Dhanoa said the Rafale, with its fantastic electronic warfare suite and maneuverability, will be able use mountainous terrain in Tibet to its advantage and blind the enemy before India’s strike aircraft penetrate hostile airspace to carry out their missions.