Pakistan Economy : Updates and Discussions

Every thing will come to a stand still. This is insane...
Not that much but yeah it's a death sentence for industrial credit, demand and liquidity. Some major countries have survived even higher rates (Russia recently) but with already low investor sentiment, tightening global sanctions and blot of terrorism there is nothing that can help improve the situation.

It will help in curbing inflation though which is expected to go even higher but at the cost of death due to hunger, malnourishment at large scale. Man made famine.
 
Increase in interest rate will further squeeze the fiscal space. 50% of their total revenues goes towards interest payment. Any increase in interest will make this requirement even go higher. So coming budget will be interesting to see on 11 th June. One of the requirement of IMF is to achieve a primary surplus of 0.6% of GDP.
 
At this rate might as well take loans from China. Who knows the interest rates might be lower.
This is the model followed widely, most FII take loans from US at around 2% invest in emerging markets, get double digit returns some of which is siphoned off in various taxes and transaction costs.

That's why wherever there is monetary tightening by federal reserve investors flee and global markets crash. When US post higher growth numbers people play it safe and keep investment there and global markets crave for investment. This infusion and suction of dollars also play havoc on exchange rates and no matter how much other countries try Dollar makes them dance because of sheer size. Everything is linked to US and other countries don't really have much options but to limit the damage.

That's why it is called when US sneezes whole world get cold.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Gautam
Tough times ahead

Khaleeq Kiani I Updated May 20, 2019

1558378731576.png


Just before his resignation as finance minister in February 2013, Dr Abdul Hafeez Shaikh was asked if he could count an achievement as finance minister. He thought for a minute and shot a counter-question: “Don’t you think caring for a patient in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is also an achievement?”

At that point, he was not able to keep up with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) because of strong domestic resistance to the Reformed General Sales Tax (RGST) and reforms in bleeding corporations. Yet he kept the Fund ‘engaged’ for almost a year without informing it to avoid a meltdown in the market.

He was considered almost an outsider in the PPP government despite his elders’ role in founding the party. He still succeeded in putting together an impressive economic team, which included Dr Nadeem Ul Haque, Shahid Kardar, Abdul Wajid Rana, Dr Waqar Masood and Salman Siddique.


Independent economists estimate a loss of almost one million jobs during the IMF programme, which is in contrast to Imran Khan’s vision of creating 10m jobs and setting the stage for an Islamic welfare state in his five-year term​
The patient is again in the proverbial ICU as Dr Shaikh takes over the job he had left seven years ago in an almost similar situation. As Pakistan enters the 22nd IMF bailout programme, it faces the highest inflation in five years and the lowest economic growth rate in nine years.

Dr Shaikh is building a new team again with support from his Musharraf-era cabinet colleague Jahangir Khan Tareen and talking to almost none of the past friends, except Mr Rana who may soon be taking over as the deputy chairman of the Planning Commission.

Dr Reza Baqir has been borrowed from the IMF to be the country’s first governor of the ‘independent SBP’. He said the latest devaluation was a reflection of market conditions a day after the prime minister ordered action against those responsible for the currency movement.

A market-based exchange rate — read depreciation at this stage — is one of the prior actions in addition to Rs700bn-plus fiscal adjustment in the budget. Other prior actions include policy rate and energy price hikes before the 39-month programme can be formally approved by the executive board of the Fund.

Shabbar Zaidi, a leading name in the auditing profession, has been tasked with improving the revenue system. Members of the technocratic team are still considered outsiders in the PTI government.

Almost all macroeconomic indicators are in decline, thanks to the nine-month uncertainty with a high opportunity cost. Public-sector corporations are no better than they were in 2013 and remain the single biggest drain on the public kitty.

Technocrats tend to ignore the political cost in their proposed road map. That is where the real challenge of the 39-month stabilisation programme emerges. Independent economists are already estimating a loss of almost one million jobs over the three-year period and the same number of people falling below the poverty line. That is in contrast to Imran Khan’s vision of creating 10m jobs and setting the stage for an Islamic welfare state in his five-year term.

The problem is that the IMF programme will continue until the last quarter of 2022, leaving less than three quarters for the PTI government to generate jobs in an election year. The PTI term will end in August 2023.

The IMF conditions are stringent. Pakistan has to ensure timely implementation of prior actions and secure letters of comfort from China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to roll over more than $8bn of their bilateral loans.

Pakistan has to ensure an ambitious structural reform agenda that supplements economic policies to rekindle growth and improve living standards, the IMF said. But it warned that financing from Pakistan’s international partners will be critical to support the authorities’ adjustment efforts and ensure that the medium-term programme objectives are achieved.

“Decisive policies and reforms, together with significant external financing, are necessary to reduce vulnerabilities faster, increase confidence and put the economy back on a sustainable growth path, with stronger private-sector activity and job creation,” the IMF said.

More importantly, a comprehensive plan for the cost recovery in the energy sector and state-owned enterprises will help eliminate or reduce the quasi-fiscal deficit that drains scarce government resources. “Provinces are committed to contributing to these efforts by better aligning their fiscal objectives with those of the federal government.”

This comes at a time the country’s per capita income in dollar terms has dropped over 8pc to about $1,515 from $1,650 last year mainly because of the depreciation. The size of the economy, as measured by GDP, in dollar terms has also come down from $313bn last year to $280bn. The GDP growth rate at 3.29pc is the lowest since 2.64pc in 2010 and way behind the current year’s target of 6.2pc.

In fact, the national economy is generally showing an all-out dismal performance during the first year of the PTI government. The agricultural output growth is 0.85pc against the target of 3.8pc. The industrial sector is growing at 1.4pc against the target of 7.6pc while the services sector’s growth rate of 4.7pc is less than its 6.5pc target.

Also, the government failed to meet investment and savings targets. The investment-to-GDP ratio has dropped to 15.4pc against the target of 17.2pc. The savings-to-GDP ratio stood at 11.1pc in 2018-19 against the target of 13.1pc.

Published in Dawn, The Business and Finance Weekly, May 20th, 2019

Tough times ahead - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
 
  • Like
Reactions: Proud_Indian
The threads at PDF about fully throwing in their lot with GCC/US/Israel against Iran (be it a small theatre like Yemen or the current stuff thats brewing) in exchange for complete bailout/100 billions of baksheesh, permanent pegged currency blah blah....is just quite revealing in itself.

Lot of these people have not one iota of shame or concept of what a nation state is.

I will enjoy this thoroughly....they deserve all of this and more. I only feel bad for the commoner living hand to mouth...that had no say in all of this....and foots the bill for stronky stronk oligarch kleptocrats (be they in uniform or not) yet again.
 
‘Imported products to become 40% more expensive in Pakistan’

Naya Din, May 20 , 2019

1558405612861.png


The devaluation of the rupee has forced traders to limit imports, which will eventually cause a rise in the price of imported items by 35 to 40%. But it won’t just be imported products that become more expensive; the price of local commodities is going to rise too.

This means that your imported cereal, jams, shampoos and body washes will all become more expensive.

The Karachi Wholesale Grocers Association’s (KWGA) patron-in-chief, Anis Majeed said that almost 50% of items are being imported, which includes daal (lentils).

Commodities with duties on them will become even more expensive, he told SAMAA TV’s on its show Naya Din on Monday. “There is 45% duty on milk powder, so we can expect that its price would rise more than other commodities,” Majeed added.

With the increase in the prices of petroleum and electricity, there will be a surge in the price of local products, the patron-in-chief said.

People can expect that their grocery shopping will cost 30% more in the coming months, he said. “If you spent Rs10,000 on groceries, you would now spend Rs13,000,” Majeed added. Moreover, the cost of transportation has caused the cost of vegetables and fruits to rise.

The dollar touched Rs150 in the open market on Friday. This is its highest-ever rate against the rupee.

‘Imported products to become 40% more expensive in Pakistan’ | Samaa Digital
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
SBP warns of higher inflation next fiscal year - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

Imran Khan could be RAW agent, a good agent will always blame others to never get doubted. He is destroying Pakistan like no other weapon could, that too with Pakistani Army on his side! Considering track record of Pakistani Army I don't doubt that those idiots can never find out his affiliation with India. So far he is doing good for us, may he take Pakistan to bankruptcy, inshallah.
 
And the infighting continues.

Sindh imposes ban on inter-provincial movement of wheat

The Newspaper's Staff Reporter, Updated May 21, 2019
1558428282842.png


KARACHI: The Sindh government has decided to impose ban on inter-provincial movement of wheat in anticipation of the grain’s shortage and resultant price hike of flour in the province.

Sindh Minister for Food Hari Ram Kishori Lal said on Monday that the decision was taken over apprehensions expressed by Pakistan Flour Mills Association South Zone about depletion of wheat stocks in Sindh and its proposal for banning wheat purchase by feed mills.

“In order to stop flow of wheat stocks from Sindh to other provinces, the home department as well as commissioners and district administrations have been directed to ensure restriction on movement of wheat from Sindh,” said the minister.

Mr Lal pointed out that current wheat crop in Punjab had suffered widespread damage in rains, which frustrated the provincial government’s plans to achieve its procurement target of the grain.

Besides, he said, there were reports that 10,000 metric tonnes of wheat was being transported from Sindh to Punjab daily, hence the Sindh government decided to ban its inter-provincial movement.

The Punjab government, too, had banned movement of wheat to stop its transportation from the Punjab to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Afghanistan, he said.

Meanwhile, Sindh Abadgar Board member Gada Hussain Mahesar said in a statement that a bumper crop was being expected to yield 6.2 million tonnes of wheat during the current season but surprisingly the Sindh government had neither announced a procurement policy nor fixed official rate of the grain as yet while the process of threshing had already picked up momentum.

He appealed to the government to lift ban on inter provincial movement of wheat and said that if the government could not afford to open procurement centres it should allow the grain’s movement to save growers from further financial losses.

He said that growers, under the obtaining conditions, were forced to dispose of their produce to local traders at much lower rates ranging from Rs1,050 to 1,120 per 40 kilogram while the official procurement rate in Punjab was Rs1,350 per 40kg and the Punjab government had opened procurement centres across the province to buy wheat.

He pointed out that growers, who had invested their hard-earned money in the cultivation of the crop in hope of having a rich harvest should not be deprived of legitimate benefit.

Published in Dawn, May 21st, 2019

Sindh imposes ban on interprovincial movement of wheat - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
Dollar climbs to Rs152 in interbank market

Talqeen Zubairi, May 21, 2019

1558428653917.png


The value of the US dollar touched Rs152 in the interbank market on Monday, with the rupee falling Rs0.5 compared to yesterday's exchange rate.

The rupee fell to Rs153 against the dollar in the open market, DawnNewsTV reported.

The benchmark KSE-100 index also showed upward movement today, climbing some 132.14 points by 1:40pm following a drop of approximately 400 points by 12:30pm.

Since the beginning of this fiscal year, the rupee has lost more than 21pc of its value to the dollar.

According to Forex Association of Pakistan President Malik Bostan, “In the State Bank of Pakistan's view, the recent movement in the exchange rate reflects the continuing resolution of accumulated imbalances of the past and some role of supply and demand factors.”

The SBP yesterday raised its policy rate by 150 basis points to 12.25 per cent, 50bps above market expectations.

The bank had cited rising inflation as well as expectations of future inflation driven by a weak rupee, widening fiscal deficit and potential adjustments to the utility tariffs as the key drivers behind the rate hike.

The decline in the rupee’s value during the past two weeks and the lagged impact of previous bouts of depreciation have pushed up the prices of almost all essential items, including flour, dates, meat, fruit etc during Ramazan.

The bank said the “inflationary pressures are likely to continue for some time”, but added that it “will continue to closely monitor the situation and stands ready to take measures, as needed, to address any unwarranted volatility in the foreign exchange market.”

The rupee began its downward spiral last week on the back of the signing of a bailout agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF had, in its statement on the programme, referred to a “market determined exchange rate”, which the financial markets did not take very well.

Resultantly, speculation broke out in the forex markets, with small and large investors looking towards the greenback, and some currency dealers hoarding dollars, leading to a shortage in the market.

Dollar climbs to Rs152 in interbank market - Business - DAWN.COM
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoneWolfSandeep
Don’t blame the IMF

S. Akbar Zaidi, Updated May 18, 2019

THERE is little disagreement that Pakistan’s economy is in a disastrous state. Even the prime minister and Pakistan’s last finance minister have acknowledged this truth, publicly. In fact, the last elected politician to hold the job as finance minister was fired precisely because the economy was in such a mess.

Not only is every key economic indicator in poor shape, all indications suggest that things are going to get much, much worse. Pakistan’s economy is going to slow down to levels not seen for more than a decade, with inflation and unemployment both reaching proportions not seen for a decade. And this is just the beginning.

With the government having just signed onto yet another IMF programme, it is important to emphasise the point, that it is not the IMF which is to blame for Pakistan’s economic condition — not for the past nor for where we are now, and also not for what is about to come. Rest assured, Pakistan’s economy is going to be severely constrained over the next few years, with higher inflation, more unemployment and lower growth, and with a far greater burden on working people than what has been the case for many years. Yet, the IMF is not to be held responsible for the state of Pakistan’s economy.

Rest assured, Pakistan’s economy is going to be severely constrained over the next few years.
The entire responsibility for the wreck that is the Pakistani economy lies squarely on the shoulders of Pakistan’s ruling and propertied elite, both civilian and in uniform, since both have been and continue to hold power in and out of office. There should be no ambiguity about apportioning blame and responsibility here, and one needs to stop blaming the IMF for the mayhem created by this ruling elite.

It is not the IMF which has brought Pakistan’s economy to its knees, to rock bottom, not the IMF which has forced Pakistan to beg for money from supposedly friendly countries, and certainly not the IMF which has made the government of Pakistan finally run to the IMF for loans. The ruling elite, those who hold office and those who hold the strings of those who hold office, are all responsible for managing the economy the way they have over the last few years and over the last decades. This truth can be clearly explained by one simple economic policy measure and non-measure.

From the Musharraf military dictatorship, to the elected governments of Benazir Bhutto, Nawaz Sharif and Asif Zardari, and now to the Imran Khan government, all have gone to the IMF seeking a ‘bailout’ and assistance to stop the country’s deteriorating economic condition.

Yet all these governments, along with their allies and vested interests, have been the ones to have caused a situation where they have been forced to go to the IMF in the first place. They only need the IMF because they fail and refuse to undertake economic reforms since these would hurt their own interests. One key indicator regarding the state of the economy is that of fiscal deficit, that of having greater, un-affordable expenditure and lower revenue or having insufficient money to spend.

If a government is not going to tax its rich, it will always be short of money to spend, no matter how well intentioned and well meaning its social welfare programmes may be. If it has high and increasing defence costs and has to pay back interest on loans taken to pay for defence and other expenditures, it will always have a shortfall of money because it refuses to tax the rich.

This is a circulatory argument: With no taxes on the rich and the elite, with the particularity of Pakistan’s political economy based on essential defence expenditures, and with a shortfall of revenue, there will only be more borrowing, more debt, and so on. The beginning and end of the problem and its solution is simply this: tax the Pakistani elite and the rich. What has the IMF got to do with this gross negligence and failure of Pakistan’s ruling elite? Because the government refuses to raise resources, it has to borrow from the IMF. The IMF is not responsible for the budget deficit ending up near 7.5 per cent of GDP this year.

It must be remembered that it is not the IMF which has come begging to the government of Imran Khan to borrow a pittance i.e. $6 billion; it is, in fact, the numerous governments of Pakistan which have gone begging for money.

This is simply because we do not raise enough resources — taxes — to be able to spend effectively, whether it is defence or development. If sufficient revenue were raised, there would be no need to beg for money, but in a country where every polio campaign, social welfare measure and women’s support programme are funded by one donor or the other, only because the ruling elite refuses to tax itself, going to the IMF becomes inevitable. But don’t blame the IMF for this.

Moreover, as a lender, the IMF is fully entitled to raise supposedly harsh conditionalities, only because it wants to ensure that its loans are returned, with interest. Banks, and even individuals, don’t lend unless they expect and get assurances that their money will be returned, and need to know about a business plan. As does the IMF, and it is fully entitled to do so. If you don’t like their conditionality, don’t borrow from them. Don’t blame the IMF for its stringent demands.

Since the government has signed an agreement with the IMF, and as the economy deteriorates noticeably over the next two to three years, we can expect those in office and the rest of the elite to blame the IMF for Pakistan’s economic disaster. Yet it is not the IMF that is to be held responsible, but our own elite, elected, unelected, and those who continue to lead Pakistan down the IMF path, yet again. Accountability must begin and end with our elite, not with the IMF.

The writer is a political economist.

Published in Dawn, May 18th, 2019

Don’t blame the IMF - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
 
Tracking IMF’s performance

From the Newspaper, Updated May 20, 2019

1558429395795.png


Of the last six programmes, Pakistan has completed two: the 2000 and 2013 ones. The illustration shows key indicators — growth, twin deficits and inflation — at the beginning and the end of each programme. It is evident that the indicators did not improve across the board under the IMF tutelage. While the fiscal deficit declined after each programme, the current account balance worsened twice and inflation increased after the 2001 programme. The growth rate often dips when the policy thrust is towards stabilisation.

1558429424504.png


Tracking IMF’s performance - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
WOW !

Total debt getting close to size of economy

By Shahabaz Rana, Published: May 21, 2019

ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan’s debt and liabilities have risen steeply to Rs35.1 trillion or 91.2% of size of the economy, further deepening concerns over debt trap that has started limiting the government’s policy options.

The statistics released by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) at the weekend showed that only from July through March of this fiscal year, there was a net addition of Rs5.2 trillion in the country’s total debt and liabilities, showing 17.4% growth over the debt level of June 2018.

The deteriorations have been witnessed in domestic, external and public sector enterprises debt, both in absolute terms and the size of the national economy, showed the central bank data.

Total debt and liabilities also include public sector enterprises (PSEs) debt, non-governmental external debt and inter-company external debt from direct investors abroad. The government’s direct responsibility was worth Rs28.6 trillion but it is indirectly responsible for most of the remaining debt due to guarantees given by the Finance Ministry and also involvement of the SBP in these borrowings.

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government had promised to revive loss-making enterprises. By March, total losses of the PSEs surged to Rs1.9 trillion, a net addition of Rs414.2 billion or 28.5% in the past nine months.

External debt and liabilities of Pakistan mounted to $105.8 billion as of March 2019, according to the central bank. During the first nine months of this fiscal year, there was a net addition of $10.6 billion in the total external debt and liabilities with a growth rate of 11.1%.

Pakistan’s total debt and liabilities are now equal to 91.2% of its gross domestic product (GDP). Only to service the public debt, the finance ministry spends 36% of the total budget.

Of the Rs35.1 trillion, the gross public debt, which is the direct responsibility of the government, stood at Rs28.6 trillion as of the end of March. The gross public debt was now equal to 74.4% of GDP, far higher than the 60% statutory limit set in the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act of 2005.

There was an increase of Rs3.7 trillion in the gross public debt in nine months, which was far higher than the overall budget deficit recorded during the period. One of the key reasons behind the higher debt was the increase in interest rate and depreciation of the rupee during July-March period of the current fiscal year.

The depreciation of one rupee adds Rs105.8 billion to the public debt. Similarly, a 1% increase in interest rate increases the cost of debt servicing by roughly Rs180 billion. This ultimately increases borrowing requirements for the finance ministry.

The central bank on Monday increased the interest rates by 1.5% aimed at fulfilling the prior condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for qualifying $6 billion bailout package. It will add over Rs260 billion in the debt servicing cost of the finance ministry on the existing stock of the debt.

Since December 2017, the central bank has let the currency weaken by over 40% and has jacked up interest rate by 6%. Despite over 40% currency devaluation, the exports witnessed negative growth during the current fiscal year.

Excluding the liabilities, the country’s total debt swelled to Rs33.1 trillion, up by Rs4.7 trillion or nearly 16.5% in nine months. The total debt was equal to 85.8% of the GDP.

The government’s domestic debt surged to Rs18.2 trillion with addition of Rs1.8 trillion in first nine months of the current fiscal year. Its external debt increased to a record Rs9.6 trillion by the end of March. Total external debt and liabilities surged to Rs13.5 trillion on the back of currency depreciation and new borrowings.

The SBP data showed that Pakistan’s foreign exchange liabilities doubled to $10 billion by March, an addition of $5 billion since June 2018. The central bank’s deposit-related liabilities increased to $5.7 billion from $700 million.

The Chinese, Saudi Arabian and United Arab Emirates loans are parked on the books of the central bank.

The PSEs’ total debt grew to Rs1.9 trillion at the end of March, an increase of Rs414.2 billion or 28.2% in just nine months. Their domestic debt soared from Rs1.1 trillion to Rs1.4 trillion. Their external debt increased from Rs324.6 billion to Rs489.4 billion.

The debt taken by Pakistan from the IMF increased in rupee terms by Rs70 billion to Rs811 billion due to currency devaluation and despite Pakistan returned a tranche.

Total liabilities, which are indirectly the responsibility of the finance ministry, increased to Rs2.1 trillion by the end of March. There was an increase of Rs625 billion or 43% in the liabilities.

Total debt getting close to size of economy | The Express Tribune

So like middle-income trap, is there a low-income trap ?