People's Liberation Army Air Force : News & Discussions

It's like a hybrid interceptor/light bomber. Perhaps supersonic release of long range AAMs and AGMs at tankers, AWACS and ships as the primary targets.
A 6th gen fighter with near-invisibility/broadband-all-aspect stealth flying with multiple VLRAAMs like PL-17, taking out USAF/USN's HVTs(tankers/AWACS etc.) along with their fighters SH/F-35/F-22/F-15EX(with PL-15s) and with added capability to take out any high-value ground/sea-surface target is a scary propsition for Chinese foes like US/India. China literally leap-frogged the West and India with this move. Only country that has a counter is Russia with Su-57M & Mig-41.
 
A 6th gen fighter with near-invisibility/broadband-all-aspect stealth flying with multiple VLRAAMs like PL-17, taking out USAF/USN's HVTs(tankers/AWACS etc.) along with their fighters SH/F-35/F-22/F-15EX(with PL-15s) and with added capability to take out any high-value ground/sea-surface target is a scary propsition for Chinese foes like US/India. China literally leap-frogged the West and India with this move. Only country that has a counter is Russia with Su-57M & Mig-41.

I don't think the Russians and Americans are worried about it. Both will get Mig-41 and NGAD at roughly the same time. Furthermore, in 2011, Robert Gates had predicted that the Chinese will have 50 J-20s by 2020 and a couple hundred by 2025, so the USAF knows what's up.

We definitely should worry if they are made in the hundreds, 'cause it can fly over Tibet from the plains without difficulty. It presents the same long range threat as heavy bombers, and they can fire off missiles from longer range than we can reach them.

Thankfully it does not pose a real tactical threat to our ground forces. But it can really stress our air defenses.

But if the USAF knew, then we would too.

As for the Shenyang aircraft, I believe it's the definitive aircraft for their Type 003 and Type 004 carriers. Both J-15 and J-35 svck for such a role, when the USN is coming out with the F/A-XX, although the J-35 can complement it in small numbers when greater manned agility is required.

Anyway, I think it's too early to call these jets 6th gen if the only criteria is broad-spectrum stealth. They are definitely next gen in terms of stealth compared to J-20 though. But even the B-21 shouldn't fit into a new terminology just 'cause of stealth in a few other spectrums. I'd understand if terahertz radars were covered too, but they are not.

For now, apart from these 2, there's a next gen fighter-bomber in development too. This can pose a serious threat to our ground forces. It's still too early to reveal a proper next gen J-20 successor. So at least 4 next jet tactical aircraft and 1 strategic bomber, innumerable UAVs and UCAVs to boot too.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Commercial sats knew about PLA 6th gen in 2021 so US intel knew about it years before
Screen-Shot-2022-09-28-at-6.00.59-PM.webp
 

@randomradio i used to said that we should have taken the IP for C17 at whatever price & conditions that uncle sam asks for, so that we can replace all IL76 with us, and can be used a common plat form for our futur EW aircraft, AWACS, maritime surveillance aircraft etc. But people were against c17 using for such thing, and now we seeing china doing same thing with c17 equivalent.

US will not transfer IP for a B34, leave alone C17's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
The French publicly revealed that the Rafale's RCS is as small as a sparrow's. It was mentioned by a VP of Dassault. It changes a bit with external payload, but its continuously improving. It used to be 0.1m2 1.5 decades ago with weapons, but was improved half a decade ago to that of a sparrow, and will see further improvement with the new version.

Close-coupled or not, it can achieve mach 2. And it can supercruise at mach 1.4 with a drop tank and 4 missiles or with 6 missiles. Typhoon manages a bit higher speed with 2 drop tanks, mach 1.5.

The new version will come with a more powerful engine, so a definite increase in supercruise speed. Plus all new avionics architecture that combines all functions into one system while drastically increasing the number of antennas. Definite increase in RCS too. Maybe it will achieve sparrow-class RCS with external payload.

Even if you don't want to believe it, imagine it's true. Would that explain why the IAF would prefer Rafale over FGFA? Or whether it will be competitive with the J-20 or not?
What can India choose? Rafale is already a good option for the 4.5 generation, and France has no political conditions, so India chose it. As for the 5th generation, India's only option was the su 57, india got nothing for $4.4 billion,
Now buy Su 57, I am afraid that Russia is unable to deliver it, and the price will be higher
Not that India thinks Rafale is better than su 57 or J 20, but that India can only buy Rafale

What's interesting is Dassault would prefer SCAF is canceled and a modernized Rafale be developed for 2050+, with a new more advanced jet at a later date.

They are probably hoping that the elections in 2027 could change the president, and the new president can end the program.
Rafale fanatics, at least Dassault thinks SCAF is the next generation, and you don't think so

img-17356090623435d93acaa97a6cb88316920876619edd64b1e12faf9349bb59bbbaf9f0d46062e.jpg

Screenshot_2024-12-31-10-55-43-777_com.miui.gallery.png

Today, China tested a new fighter using a deflagration ramjet
 
What can India choose? Rafale is already a good option for the 4.5 generation, and France has no political conditions, so India chose it. As for the 5th generation, India's only option was the su 57, india got nothing for $4.4 billion,
Now buy Su 57, I am afraid that Russia is unable to deliver it, and the price will be higher
Not that India thinks Rafale is better than su 57 or J 20, but that India can only buy Rafale
First of all who informed you India invested 4.4 billion USD in the PAKFA project ? Global Times or People's Daily or Xinhua ?

Secondly check out the price at which the deal was signed with Algeria for the Su-57 assuming it's true .

Finally what makes you think Russia is unable to deliver the Su-57 assuming India's willing to buy it ? Where do you get all this information from ? Weibo or Sino Defence Forum ?
View attachment 39282
View attachment 39283
Today, China tested a new fighter using a deflagration ramjet

Let us guess - PLAAF is testing their 7th Gen Fighter Aircraft !
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rajput Lion
IDK what is this after 2 6gen flying jets already revealed & how this can be 6gen with variable sweep canards, rudders, Sukhoi like engine intakes & variable-sweep wings, big cross section.
1735636029324.png

1735636118077.png



 
US will not transfer IP for a B34, leave alone C17's.
US is ready to transfer c130,is ready with f16,f18 and probably on f15 too. These aircrafts are still in production in us facilities, still they offered so I believe US wouldn't have any problem in selling c17 production line to us if we have asks for it earlier.
 
What can India choose? Rafale is already a good option for the 4.5 generation, and France has no political conditions, so India chose it. As for the 5th generation, India's only option was the su 57, india got nothing for $4.4 billion,
Now buy Su 57, I am afraid that Russia is unable to deliver it, and the price will be higher
Not that India thinks Rafale is better than su 57 or J 20, but that India can only buy Rafale

All you have is wrong information.

Russia wants India in Su-57, we are the ones who rejected it.

Russia's making our version on their own now.

Rafale fanatics, at least Dassault thinks SCAF is the next generation, and you don't think so

Yes. But SCAF is expected in 2050+, when China will have 7th gen. So the French expect to fight J-20, J-36 etc with the Rafale.

View attachment 39282
View attachment 39283
Today, China tested a new fighter using a deflagration ramjet

That's good. All big countries have SSTO dreams. It's unclear if there are military designs right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin
IDK what is this after 2 6gen flying jets already revealed & how this can be 6gen with variable sweep canards, rudders, Sukhoi like engine intakes & variable-sweep wings, big cross section.
View attachment 39287
View attachment 39288



This is claimed by the Chinese to be a 7th gen (their 6th gen) "integrated space-air platform." It can supposedly operate in space.


I'd say it's near-space, like Mig-41. It lacks significant stealth features probably because they want to use it in standoff capacity as an ASAT or a standoff missile launcher that won't come close to the enemy, that is if they plan to actually pursue it.

It could also be some animation project.

I guess they are releasing such designs before the West or Russians do so they are not accused of copying.

Basically what I believe will be the equivalent of our AHCA; hypersonic, near-space or space and so on.
 
What can India choose? Rafale is already a good option for the 4.5 generation, and France has no political conditions, so India chose it. As for the 5th generation, India's only option was the su 57, india got nothing for $4.4 billion,
Now buy Su 57, I am afraid that Russia is unable to deliver it, and the price will be higher
Not that India thinks Rafale is better than su 57 or J 20, but that India can only buy Rafale


Rafale fanatics, at least Dassault thinks SCAF is the next generation, and you don't think so

View attachment 39282
View attachment 39283
Today, China tested a new fighter using a deflagration ramjet

This Chinese jet is a bomb truck and not fighter. It clearly lacks the capability to maneuver. It uses 4th generation engine (Chinese copy of Al 31) with very low T/W ratio. It has no sixth-generation stuff in it it except very low radar visibility. IR signatures seems high. No DEW seems to be mounted on it. Its best use is to deliver Standoff weapon from distance in excess of 300 to 400 K.M. 3 engines is a clear indicator of poor T/W ratio of that engine.
 
This is claimed by the Chinese to be a 7th gen (their 6th gen) "integrated space-air platform." It can supposedly operate in space.


I'd say it's near-space, like Mig-41. It lacks significant stealth features probably because they want to use it in standoff capacity as an ASAT or a standoff missile launcher that won't come close to the enemy, that is if they plan to actually pursue it.

It could also be some animation project.

I guess they are releasing such designs before the West or Russians do so they are not accused of copying.

Basically what I believe will be the equivalent of our AHCA; hypersonic, near-space or space and so on.
> 1st define 7th gen characteristics - size, weight, weapons, cost, numbers, timeline, etc when people are not convinced about 6gen, then talk about it.
> Open new thread if required. You can use the following thread also:
 
> 1st define 7th gen characteristics - size, weight, weapons, cost, numbers, timeline, etc when people are not convinced about 6gen, then talk about it.
> Open new thread if required. You can use the following thread also:

Right now 6th gen is not defined. As per the Americans, 6th gen is about broad-spectrum stealth. As per the Russians, 6th gen is Mig-41 with both broad-spectrum stealth and near-hypersonic or hypersonic speed. As per the Chinese, 7th gen is what the Russians call 6th gen, but the Chinese also call it 6th gen, because their terminology is different because they skipped 1st gen.

Once both NGAD and Mig-41 are flying, we can tell for sure how to define 6th gen at least.

I'd argue the current definition of generations are not correct. What it should really be like instead, defined by airframe:
4th = Teens, J-10, M2000, Flanker, LCA Mk1/A, Mig-29, Gripen C etc. Standard specs.
5th = Rafale, Typhoon, SH, LCA Mk2, Gripen E, Su-47, Mig 1.44 etc. Frontal stealth and/or supercruise, reduced IR signature. Supercruisers can be 5.5th.
6th = F-22, F-35, J-20, Su-57 etc. All aspect stealth. B-2 could qualify as 6.5th.
7th = NGAD, B-21. Broad-spectrum stealth. The new Chinese jets could be 6.5th or 7th.
8th = Near-space and space. The airframe can even deform using metamaterials. You don't need significant amounts of shaping with metamaterials.

In this list, 5th is when some measure of stealth was applied for the first time and was significantly improved on the 6th.

If you bring in specific qualities, then an aircraft could have features from multiple generations. Like Rafale and Typhoon can supercruise, but the F-35 cannot.

But the Russians have corrupted the system by deliberately ignoring Eurocanards and lumping them with the likes of Su-27 and F-15, which the Americans also wanted. Now the Russians want to do the same by bringing in high speed into 6th gen, in order to lump some versions of NGAD and other slower jets with 5th gen.

Here Baidi or White Emperor is called 6th gen by an official Chinese govt account. (That's their 7th gen).

Metamaterials can give you such a design.

So right now, we don't know if 6th gen should have high speed or not. If the Russians start flying their Mig-41 next year or the year after, as they have claimed, and start calling it 6th gen, then high speed will become a criteria and everything below mach 3.5 or mach 4 will get lumped into 5th gen, however ridiculous that is, 'cause all modern AAMs operate below that speed.

Then the definition will be, any aircraft that has different grades of stealth like F-22/F-35 to NGAD/J-36, but has speed lower than an AAM will be 5th gen and all aircraft above AAM speed will be 6th gen.

So the Russians defined 5th gen as stealth, supercruise and supermaneuverability, and LM began marketing their jets as such after adding sensor fusion to it. Now it's possible the Russians will end up defining 6th gen 'cause they could end up pioneering it.

While I think my personal list is better, the pioneers will play politics instead. So the specific characteristics will be more important than the blanket definition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion