Did Dassault present French government document? Or Swiss look into it ?
Your question is not very clear, but I suppose it is about whether France is as transparent as the US in exposing the problems of developing our weapons systems.
The F-35 supporters want to make believe that the US is the only one to be transparent, but it's not true, there are in all countries control bodies that release reports when there is something wrong.
What is true is that the F-35 programme is so bad that it is under exceptional scrutiny in the US, which gives more information than for other US programmes.
So we have "La cours des comptes" which is the equivalent of the GAO and which makes an annual report to denounce cost drifts on programmes, only when it audited the Rafale programme it found that the cost drift attributable to Dassault was 4.5% over 30 years. Such a result did not make the headlines!
Similarly, when the programme delivers systems in accordance with their specifications, on time and at the agreed price, which is the case with Dassault, there is no exceptional surveillance that is put in place, only the routine that is ensured by DGA audits.
But for example, at the beginning of the Rafale programme, there were problems with the Rafale gun and this was not hidden at all. So when there are abnormal problems, we say so and if we say nothing, it is because the problems will be solved before the next delivery.
Incidentally, in France, when there is a problem that corresponds to category 1 of the F-35 programme (I did say a single problem in this category), all Rafales are stopped from flying and only the flights to correct this anomaly are authorised. Flights can only be resumed when the anomaly has been corrected and the correction has been deployed on the aircraft to be flown.
So we do not understand the deployments of F-35s, by the hundreds, with 13 category 1 anomalies, not counting those that have been abusively downgraded from 1 to 2 in order to be able to postpone the correction.
