Yes, the approach is the last Rafale in January with all the ISE and a retrofit of the ISE from January to april, in India, for the other 35 Rafale.
Yes, the approach is the last Rafale in January with all the ISE and a retrofit of the ISE from January to april, in India, for the other 35 Rafale.
Maybe the UAE's 60 Mirage 2000-9s will be for sale if they buy Rafale from us?If France wants to dispose its older Mirage 2000s , India will always buy them happily
This is the same for every modern fighter aircraft. Upkeep is very expensive. French does not have immediate threats and they are prioritizing exports now.Give it will be a new fleet of planes, that should be achievable. Depending on how many spare engines you get. They have about a 12 month turnaround for major repair. Going by the link, the government say they are cannibalising 14. Probably because of not being able to be repaired. Possible frame cracking or similar terminal issue. They still have ongoing 'engine issues'.
"Out of 102 Rafale available to the AAE in 2020, 14 were immobilized to be "cannibalized" .... Mr. Ferrara. “Taking into account the issues related to the engine and the level of operational support [NSO], the operational technical availability [DTO] of the Rafale [air and navy] reached 55.8% in the first half of 2021"
Maybe the UAE's 60 Mirage 2000-9s will be for sale if they buy Rafale from us?
But Qatar has just sold its own.The last I heard, they want to keep their M2000s. The same with Taiwan.
This aeronautical company, based in south-eastern France, has just concluded the purchase of 12 second-hand Mirage 2000-5s from Qatar, in order to develop the "Red Air" market in Europe. In other words, the training of armed forces by private fleets.
I don't think so, SPECTRA is fine for self-protection. A good approach for this combination is to have the Rafale far in front in silent mode, and the SU-30 MKI behind with an active Radar watch and a diffusion of the collected data to the Rafale.@Picdelamirand-oil
@randomradio
Please look at the above picture
My question is that
If One Rafale and 2 Su 30s are flying in a Triangular formation then
Will SPECTRA of the Rafale in front also help in Reducing the RCS of Sukhois following the Rafale
@Picdelamirand-oil
@randomradio
Please look at the above picture
My question is that
If One Rafale and 2 Su 30s are flying in a Triangular formation then
Will SPECTRA of the Rafale in front also help in Reducing the RCS of Sukhois following the Rafale
The answer is absolutely not. Why do you ask these two? You actually believe their claims as some "expert" especially pic-oil?@Picdelamirand-oil
@randomradio
Please look at the above picture
My question is that
If One Rafale and 2 Su 30s are flying in a Triangular formation then
Will SPECTRA of the Rafale in front also help in Reducing the RCS of Sukhois following the Rafale
Really? How? This is now sounding more like plasma stealth of the Russians.Now F-35 can not only reduce the RCS of 4th gen fighters
You were right about the DRFM of rafale aka SPECTRA but then out of your habitual fan boyishness went on further and started bragging about same thing on F35. LoL.The answer is absolutely not. Why do you ask these two? You actually believe their claims as some "expert" especially pic-oil?
Spectra has always been nothing but hype it is no more advanced than a AN/ALQ-131(v) EW pod.
AN/ALQ-131(V) Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) Pod | Northrop Grumman
Northrop Grumman’s AN/ALQ-131 Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) pod protects aircrews from radio frequency threats to allow for effective electromagnetic spectrum operations (EMSO).www.northropgrumman.com
Now F-35 can not only reduce the RCS of 4th gen fighters but it can completely hide them and themselves.
‘The initial scenario was that our two F-35s would escort a four-ship of F-16s across a notional border and protect them against another eight-ship of F-16s simulating a modern adversary. A relatively inexperienced flight leader was in charge of the F-16s on our side and Lt Col Joost ‘Niki’ Luijsterburg, the Tucson detachment commander, was responsible for the adversaries. Up to this point we had only practised these scenarios in the simulators and while we had a decent game-plan, we were all anxious to see how the F-35 would perform in real life. We figured that the F-35’s stealth would keep us out of harm’s way for most of the fight, but that we also need to protect the friendly F-16s, maximize the lethality of their missiles and get them to the target.
To make this happen, we planned to initially use electronic attack against the adversary F-16s, see if we could avoid having them detect friendly fighters and datalink the location of the hostile aircraft to our F-16s. This way we could use the F-16s on our side to shoot down the initial wave of enemy fighters and keep our own missiles available once the ‘Blue Air’ F-16s had to focus on their target attack. The plan worked flawlessly.
Dutch F-35As OUT of the SHADOWS - Combat Aircraft May 2018 pp6.pdf
EPAWSS being installed on 4th gen fighters also have this capability however it was tested to see if it can hide F-22s and F-35s getting them closer to advanced IADS and it was able.
How about you read my whole reply that talks about the Dutch F-35s and what they did.Really? How? This is now sounding more like plasma stealth of the Russians.
Oy vey. Another one... I guess you stopped reading just before you got to the part in what the Dutch F-35s did? Keep reading sweetheart.You were right about the DRFM of rafale aka SPECTRA but then out of your habitual fan boyishness went on further and started bragging about same thing on F35. LoL.
Right now only Active Jamming using massive jammers like those AN/ALQ 249 on new Growlers or Khibny on Su 35 and 57, can hide such large formations by blinding the hostile radars.
TBH I didn’t read your post as it’s lengthy.How about you read my whole reply that talks about the Dutch F-35s and what they did.
Oy vey. Another one... I guess you stopped reading just before you got to the part in what the Dutch F-35s did? Keep reading sweetheart.
One more point. After buying India doesn't like pestering snooping and advice on how to use and on whom to use/not use the weapons it bought after fully paying for it.....India wants transfer of technology, to enable manufacturing their own platforms. The US isn't going to do this. So it doesn't suit India. It is a mistake to think that this reflects on the standard of US platforms.