Small Arms & Tactical Equipment

Tonbo was infact great when it comes to quality and delivered well ahead of schedule. Their products were priced well below their western counterparts but the kickback hungry top brass of IA wouldn't hesitate to kill any indigenous project for their commissions

MoD should impose a self arms embargo for all weapons systems where we made significant progress...starting with small arms, troop carriers/mechanized units and artillery systems
What stops them from exporting.
Chinese companies like leapers, barska, ncstar, Redfield, firefield, (probably all made by one company in the same sweatshop) make a killing in the US civilian market. Even Russian optics companies are trying to break into the US civilian market. What stops Tonbo from selling out side India.

Brilliant brands like meprolight, Aimpoint, Carl Zeiss, Nikon, trijicon, vortex all of them make 50-80% of their revenue from Civilian markets. If tonbo is really as good as it is touted to be, why not sell in US civilian markets? Even FLIR 's majority income is from civilian markets although it's a leader in the military segment. A pulsar helion thermal sight sells for almost 3g's if it can put out a comparable product out there for half the price why wouldn't people buy it. These companies crying about corruption in the procurement act like they are rip wan winkle, do they not know how India works, did they not do any risk assessment from the get-go.

Indian System - a combine military-political establishment-Administration-bureaucracy-chaprasi syndicate will snuff out each and every innovative company and individuals until their owners are in the hands of ambanis/tatas/mahindra/adanis or some other rich family.

Take the royal enfield route, leverage Indian innovation and bring products to a global stage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parthu and jetray
What stops them from exporting.
Chinese companies like leapers, barska, ncstar, Redfield, firefield, (probably all made by one company in the same sweatshop) make a killing in the US civilian market. Even Russian optics companies are trying to break into the US civilian market. What stops Tonbo from selling out side India.

Brilliant brands like meprolight, Aimpoint, Carl Zeiss, Nikon, trijicon, vortex all of them make 50-80% of their revenue from Civilian markets. If tonbo is really as good as it is touted to be, why not sell in US civilian markets? Even FLIR 's majority income is from civilian markets although it's a leader in the military segment. A pulsar helion thermal sight sells for almost 3g's if it can put out a comparable product out there for half the price why wouldn't people buy it. These companies crying about corruption in the procurement act like they are rip wan winkle, do they not know how India works, did they not do any risk assessment from the get-go.

Indian System - a combine military-political establishment-Administration-bureaucracy-chaprasi syndicate will snuff out each and every innovative company and individuals until their owners are in the hands of ambanis/tatas/mahindra/adanis or some other rich family.

Take the royal enfield route, leverage Indian innovation and bring products to a global stage.
Tonbo actually exports to foreign countries. In fact, IA found out about Tonbo during a joint exercise with some NATO unit I believe where the foreign unit was using Tonbo sights which made IA look inwards after which orders were placed. Apart from the large order for Arjun thermal weapon sights, Tonbo's photon driver vision system is also used on DRDO/Tata WhAP


 
India’s AK-203 Program Delayed

We have been closely following India’s tentative steps towards modernisation of her Army’s small arms and the replacement of the INSAS rifle. It seemed that with the selection of Kalashnikov Concern’s AK-203 that India had selected a rifle suited to its soldier’s needs but recent reports suggest that the progress toward beginning production of the new rifles may have stalled.

India’s Economic Times recently reported that the factory established to produced the new Indian AK-203’s won’t begin work before the end of 2020. The delay has been attributed not only to delays related to the ongoing Coronavirus Pandemic but also “over differences in pricing”. The price for the establishing of the factory, tooling up and production of at least 670,000 rifles was forecast to be agreed at the end of May.

Back in February, we took a look at the differences between the Russian AK-203 and the planned Indian AK-203. We noted that the Indian configuration retains the AK-203’s railed top cover, contoured ergonomic pistol grip and its muzzle device. However, the Indian Army has not opted for the Russian 203’s adjustable buttstock, instead opting for the simpler AK-103 folding stock and a handguard with no top rail. The Indian configuration, as it stands, also lacks the Russian 203’s finger tab for easier manipulation without moving the right hand too far off the pistol grip.

With a potential order for 750,000 rifles, the scope of the contract is huge with a potential cost reported in 2018 of $2.5 billion. While the Indian government appeared to announce the agreement over 12 months ago, we have been waiting for further news on the signing of a contract for the production of the new rifles. It has been suggested that the order is now estimated to be worth just under $2 billion – this yet to be officially confirmed as negotiations continue.

A joint venture company, Indo Rifles, has been formed with 50-50 ownership split between India’s state Ordnance Factory Board and Russia’s Kalashnikov Concern/Rosoboronexport. Production is planned at a plant in Amethi. The Amethi factory is projected to create at least 200 new jobs and produce over 70,000 rifles a year.

Also worth noting are the Indian government’s plans to reform India’s state-operated Ordnance Factory Board. With plans to corporatise the OFB announced at the beginning of May by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman more than 40 of India’s ordnance factories are now on the verge of strike action. The OFB is certainly in need of reform, whether corporatisation is the right method to achieve this is unclear.

The Indian government’s planned corporatisation of the OFB would, in theory, improve accountability, efficiency and autonomy while also allowing increased foreign investment. Unions and workers, however, are concerned that the move would inevitably see factory closures and job losses as the private sector struggles to make India’s massive defense industry profitable – while also maintaining capacity in the event of a war. The OFB factories employ over 80,000 workers and the three main unions have agreed to on strike action in July, although it has been confirmed that any strikes will be deferred if tensions between China and India continue to rise.

India's AK-203 Program Delayed -
 
1593513028933.png

1593513045778.png

1593513062400.png

1593513071971.png


I understand this is a mod, but still it looks shoddy. I see a Magpul CTR stock, Viper CQB stock and a third unknown stock.
 
I'm disappointed that they are using iron sights on a 7.62 NATO gun... Have any optics been ordered?
BEL, MKU and Tonbo have been supplying gun and helmet mounted sights for IA. These pictures look like initial testing in some sorta firing range when first received. I'm sure optics would be provided when given to active troops deployed in the valley
 
In 2018, the army placed a Rs 170-crore order for 158,000 helmets from Kanpur-based firm MKU. The helmets were, however, found to offer inadequate protection against the AK-47 bullets commonly used by militants. A stop-gap AK-47 protector—a modular ceramic add-on plate produced and designed by another manufacturer—was then issued to troops.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Sathya
In 2018, the army placed a Rs 170-crore order for 158,000 helmets from Kanpur-based firm MKU. The helmets were, however, found to offer inadequate protection against the AK-47 bullets commonly used by militants. A stop-gap AK-47 protector—a modular ceramic add-on plate produced and designed by another manufacturer—was then issued to troops.
Is this true? I thought IA was fairly satisfied with the MKU helmets...much better than the vintage Patkas

Or is this another saga for IA's top brass to gain some kickbacks due to their love for foreign maal?
 
Is this true? I thought IA was fairly satisfied with the MKU helmets...much better than the vintage Patkas

Or is this another saga for IA's top brass to gain some kickbacks due to their love for foreign maal?
Everything was fine untill very recently more lethal bullets were found to be used by terrorists. These bullets caused casualties on our side. It was stated only then that improved helmets and BJPs will be procured for units involved in active combat.