The other two were poisoned by the same poison. Also, are you suggesting that if we catch a Russian committing espionage, which is also a crime, that we can nerve gas them.
Two words, Intent and means.
The "other " poisoning you are talking about happens a long time after the real poisoning. Britain failed to provide any evidence for intent and means for the second poisoning and accused Russia without evidence.
The UN never point fingers, but the trajectories they released prove it could only have been the Assad regime.
UN do point fingers when they have evidence. For example the latest Myanmar report pointed their military for genocide. The only reason why UN didn't pointed fingers at Sharia is because they cannot find any real evidence. I posted the report earlier and there is nothing that points to SAA. Guardian just published some bullshit just like the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq lie.
Who sucks up to them. The press hounds them everywhere and they make money for the taxpayer via tourism. A bit like the Kardashians only much less annoying.
You peoples. Lol.. is she not the head of the state even though she is child of terrorists? Are you peoples take you oath of citizenship in her name? Didn't your parliamentarians bend their neck in front of her all the time? Isn't she the commander of the Army? Isn't she the one who appoints your prime minister. Isn't your prime minister supposed to kiss her middle finger before becoming prime minister lol.. Aren't you peoples supposed to sing glory to that daughter of terrorists whenever you sing your national anthem? That's what I call sucking up to them.
Iran supported Al-Quaeda in Iraq. When the Bin Laden raid cut off the head, they went scurrying everywhere and joined up with others in IS. Iran also support Hezbollah in Syria however, who is an enemy of IS, so recently Iran got its first taste of what it helped create.
It was right to support resistance to Soviet expansionism. The outcome of idiocy is unfortunate but nobody regrets stopping the Soviets for one second. No one will ever miss a dictatorship because they are just well organised terrorists and most can trace their roots back to terrorist uprisings too. Saddam Hussein, Assad, the CCP, the Soviets. All of them started as terrorists at some point within the last 100 years.
The Middle East is complicated because there's oil there. There said it. But 90% of global dictatorships are Russian or Chinese allies. What does that tell you? Is there a single democracy that's aligned to Russia or China in the same way that Canada, Europe, Japan, South Korea, ROC, Australia and New Zealand are aligned with the US? Saudi Arabia is very much an exception to the rule globally.
Well I know a bunch of people's who suffered because of UK-US support to Islamic extremists including all Taliban commanders in afganistan. It's the Afganistan proples.
And no, Iran have nothing to do with al-queida which is a sunny Islamic terror group that consider Iran as it's sworn enemy. Stop trying to blame your failures on someone else.
More than 70% of all dictators in this planet is a UK-US ally. Entire religious fanatic salafist dictators of GCC are your allies. So was almost all military dictators from sisi of Egypt to Musharraf of Pakistan to Latin America and Africa.
You peoples pretant like you are fighting for democracy, when in reality the only thing that common in all your wars is that the one you fight is a pro Russian regime or one that oppose petro-dollar.