U.K - News, Updates & Discussions.

Rolls-Royce Is Fast Becoming a British Calamity
The jet engine maker’s precarious balance sheet endangers its long-term independence.

When the employees of Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc read that coronavirus lockdowns and home-working have ignited a technology boom, they could be forgiven for weeping.

The company makes the jet engines that power large passenger jets, which is one of the most technically complex engineering tasks known to man. And yet, most of Rolls-Royce’s products are grounded right now because hardly anyone’s flying. On Thursday the British manufacturer revealed the devastation inflicted on its business by Covid-19 travel restrictions: The 5.4 billion-pound ($7.1 billion) loss for the six months to June was one of the biggest profit shortfalls in U.K. corporate history.

A separate announcement that Rolls-Royce’s chief financial officer, Stephen Daintith, is jumping ship to Ocado Group Plc, an online grocer, compounded the gloom. It’s depressing that e-commerce is seen as a better destination than advanced engineering.

But you can’t blame Daintith for grabbing a parachute. Ocado’s shares have doubled this year, valuing the company at almost 19 billion pounds. Rolls-Royce — the pride of British manufacturing — is worth a quarter of that, having lost two-thirds of its value in eight months. Technology companies aren’t all equal in this market.

Incredibly, the 5.4 billion-pound loss wasn’t even the most troubling number in Rolls-Royce’s financial statement. Its balance sheet liabilities now exceed its assets by 8 billion pounds. This partly reflects big swings in the value of currency derivatives, rather than the underlying health of the business. Nevertheless, the massive net liabilities are by far the largest of any European company, according to Bloomberg data. It’s a terrible look for a company that spends years developing new engines, and then makes most of its money from long-term service agreements. Customers need to be confident that it will be around to meet those maintenance obligations.

While Rolls-Royce’s airline customers have their own pandemic problems, they’ve good reason to worry about the financial health of a key supplier. When the coronavirus crisis is over, Rolls-Royce will need to invest heavily in new technology that cuts carbon emissions. It doesn’t have the balance sheet to do that.

There’s enough money to keep the lights on for the next 12 months, including 8 billion pounds of cash and undrawn credit facilities. But if there’s a second virus wave that prevents airlines from resuming long-haul flying, things might get tight in the autumn of 2021, when Rolls-Royce must repay or replace a 1.9 billion-pound revolving credit facility. The accounts include a warning of material uncertainty over whether the company can continue as a going concern if the aviation recovery takes longer than expected.

Rolls-Royce is doing all it can to strengthen its defenses. Assets valued at more than 2 billion pounds have been marked for sale. But this is hardly a seller’s market.

The company continues to burn through cash, and its net indebtedness (including lease liabilities) is projected to rise to almost 6 billion pounds by the end of this year. Returning to a positive cash position will take years.

A large equity raise looks unavoidable to restore confidence. Unless the share price recovers a lot before then — which is unlikely — shareholders who don’t participate will be heavily diluted.

The group is considering industrial partnerships to share the burden of developing of its next-generation Ultrafan engine — Rolls-Royce’s engineering pride and joy. But if things get much worse, questions will be asked about whether it should remain an independent company in such a capital-intensive industry. A merger — whether with British defense manufacturer BAE Systems Plc or another engine maker — would be a less precarious path to recovery.
 
Rolls-Royce Is Fast Becoming a British Calamity
The jet engine maker’s precarious balance sheet endangers its long-term independence.

When the employees of Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc read that coronavirus lockdowns and home-working have ignited a technology boom, they could be forgiven for weeping.

The company makes the jet engines that power large passenger jets, which is one of the most technically complex engineering tasks known to man. And yet, most of Rolls-Royce’s products are grounded right now because hardly anyone’s flying. On Thursday the British manufacturer revealed the devastation inflicted on its business by Covid-19 travel restrictions: The 5.4 billion-pound ($7.1 billion) loss for the six months to June was one of the biggest profit shortfalls in U.K. corporate history.

A separate announcement that Rolls-Royce’s chief financial officer, Stephen Daintith, is jumping ship to Ocado Group Plc, an online grocer, compounded the gloom. It’s depressing that e-commerce is seen as a better destination than advanced engineering.

But you can’t blame Daintith for grabbing a parachute. Ocado’s shares have doubled this year, valuing the company at almost 19 billion pounds. Rolls-Royce — the pride of British manufacturing — is worth a quarter of that, having lost two-thirds of its value in eight months. Technology companies aren’t all equal in this market.

Incredibly, the 5.4 billion-pound loss wasn’t even the most troubling number in Rolls-Royce’s financial statement. Its balance sheet liabilities now exceed its assets by 8 billion pounds. This partly reflects big swings in the value of currency derivatives, rather than the underlying health of the business. Nevertheless, the massive net liabilities are by far the largest of any European company, according to Bloomberg data. It’s a terrible look for a company that spends years developing new engines, and then makes most of its money from long-term service agreements. Customers need to be confident that it will be around to meet those maintenance obligations.

While Rolls-Royce’s airline customers have their own pandemic problems, they’ve good reason to worry about the financial health of a key supplier. When the coronavirus crisis is over, Rolls-Royce will need to invest heavily in new technology that cuts carbon emissions. It doesn’t have the balance sheet to do that.

There’s enough money to keep the lights on for the next 12 months, including 8 billion pounds of cash and undrawn credit facilities. But if there’s a second virus wave that prevents airlines from resuming long-haul flying, things might get tight in the autumn of 2021, when Rolls-Royce must repay or replace a 1.9 billion-pound revolving credit facility. The accounts include a warning of material uncertainty over whether the company can continue as a going concern if the aviation recovery takes longer than expected.

Rolls-Royce is doing all it can to strengthen its defenses. Assets valued at more than 2 billion pounds have been marked for sale. But this is hardly a seller’s market.

The company continues to burn through cash, and its net indebtedness (including lease liabilities) is projected to rise to almost 6 billion pounds by the end of this year. Returning to a positive cash position will take years.

A large equity raise looks unavoidable to restore confidence. Unless the share price recovers a lot before then — which is unlikely — shareholders who don’t participate will be heavily diluted.

The group is considering industrial partnerships to share the burden of developing of its next-generation Ultrafan engine — Rolls-Royce’s engineering pride and joy. But if things get much worse, questions will be asked about whether it should remain an independent company in such a capital-intensive industry. A merger — whether with British defense manufacturer BAE Systems Plc or another engine maker — would be a less precarious path to recovery.
How do you reckon, Paddy? RR will be gobbled up by SAFRAN? As I see it HMG is too broke & your overseas masters - the US already has 2 crown jewels. I don't see any other suitor or way out for RR. @BMD
 
How do you reckon, Paddy? RR will be gobbled up by SAFRAN? As I see it HMG is too broke & your overseas masters - the US already has 2 crown jewels. I don't see any other suitor or way out for RR. @BMD
BAE SYSTEMS might buy it. I don't see any civil aircraft engine builder doing well lately though anyway.
 
Yup, huge £1.73bn profit last year, £5.5bn of assets.
Take a look at the article & the figures quoted & compare it to BAe's balance sheet.RR either needs a bailout plan by HMG or an eligible suitor like SAFRAN. What you're suggesting may well prove to be the death knell for BAe in the long term.
 
I don't see any civil aircraft engine builder doing well lately though anyway.
SAFRAN
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period (in € millions) First-half 2019 2,330 First-half 2020 2,632
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (in € millions) First-half 2019 2,470 First-half 2020 4,373

2020 Interim FINANCIAL REPORT page 34
 
SAFRAN
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period (in € millions) First-half 2019 2,330 First-half 2020 2,632
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (in € millions) First-half 2019 2,470 First-half 2020 4,373

2020 Interim FINANCIAL REPORT page 34
SAFRAN is not an engine builder though, it's a defence company that also builds engines, which is what BAE SYSTEMS would be if it buys RR.
 
SAFRAN is not an engine builder though, it's a defence company that also builds engines, which is what BAE SYSTEMS would be if it buys RR.
Justifying BAe's take over of RR on specious grounds as you've done above is like expecting an ancillary supplier to take over a major car brand. It's not impossible but with the current liabilities it may well doom both parties plus your justification is unjustified & stupid.
 
Rolls-Royce Is Fast Becoming a British Calamity
The jet engine maker’s precarious balance sheet endangers its long-term independence.

When the employees of Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc read that coronavirus lockdowns and home-working have ignited a technology boom, they could be forgiven for weeping.

The company makes the jet engines that power large passenger jets, which is one of the most technically complex engineering tasks known to man. And yet, most of Rolls-Royce’s products are grounded right now because hardly anyone’s flying. On Thursday the British manufacturer revealed the devastation inflicted on its business by Covid-19 travel restrictions: The 5.4 billion-pound ($7.1 billion) loss for the six months to June was one of the biggest profit shortfalls in U.K. corporate history.

A separate announcement that Rolls-Royce’s chief financial officer, Stephen Daintith, is jumping ship to Ocado Group Plc, an online grocer, compounded the gloom. It’s depressing that e-commerce is seen as a better destination than advanced engineering.

But you can’t blame Daintith for grabbing a parachute. Ocado’s shares have doubled this year, valuing the company at almost 19 billion pounds. Rolls-Royce — the pride of British manufacturing — is worth a quarter of that, having lost two-thirds of its value in eight months. Technology companies aren’t all equal in this market.

Incredibly, the 5.4 billion-pound loss wasn’t even the most troubling number in Rolls-Royce’s financial statement. Its balance sheet liabilities now exceed its assets by 8 billion pounds. This partly reflects big swings in the value of currency derivatives, rather than the underlying health of the business. Nevertheless, the massive net liabilities are by far the largest of any European company, according to Bloomberg data. It’s a terrible look for a company that spends years developing new engines, and then makes most of its money from long-term service agreements. Customers need to be confident that it will be around to meet those maintenance obligations.

While Rolls-Royce’s airline customers have their own pandemic problems, they’ve good reason to worry about the financial health of a key supplier. When the coronavirus crisis is over, Rolls-Royce will need to invest heavily in new technology that cuts carbon emissions. It doesn’t have the balance sheet to do that.

There’s enough money to keep the lights on for the next 12 months, including 8 billion pounds of cash and undrawn credit facilities. But if there’s a second virus wave that prevents airlines from resuming long-haul flying, things might get tight in the autumn of 2021, when Rolls-Royce must repay or replace a 1.9 billion-pound revolving credit facility. The accounts include a warning of material uncertainty over whether the company can continue as a going concern if the aviation recovery takes longer than expected.

Rolls-Royce is doing all it can to strengthen its defenses. Assets valued at more than 2 billion pounds have been marked for sale. But this is hardly a seller’s market.

The company continues to burn through cash, and its net indebtedness (including lease liabilities) is projected to rise to almost 6 billion pounds by the end of this year. Returning to a positive cash position will take years.

A large equity raise looks unavoidable to restore confidence. Unless the share price recovers a lot before then — which is unlikely — shareholders who don’t participate will be heavily diluted.

The group is considering industrial partnerships to share the burden of developing of its next-generation Ultrafan engine — Rolls-Royce’s engineering pride and joy. But if things get much worse, questions will be asked about whether it should remain an independent company in such a capital-intensive industry. A merger — whether with British defense manufacturer BAE Systems Plc or another engine maker — would be a less precarious path to recovery.

The govt will likely bail out Rolls.

SAFRAN
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period (in € millions) First-half 2019 2,330 First-half 2020 2,632
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period (in € millions) First-half 2019 2,470 First-half 2020 4,373

2020 Interim FINANCIAL REPORT page 34

Don't think the British will allow a company from the EU to take over a British company in the strategic sector. So at least the military side can be rescued, even if the civil side goes up for grabs.
 
The govt will likely bail out Rolls.



Don't think the British will allow a company from the EU to take over a British company in the strategic sector. So at least the military side can be rescued, even if the civil side goes up for grabs.
BMD just said "I don't see any civil aircraft engine builder doing well lately though anyway. " and I show him a civil aircraft engine builder with relatively good results. That's it.
 
BMD just said "I don't see any civil aircraft engine builder doing well lately though anyway. " and I show him a civil aircraft engine builder with relatively good results. That's it.
Yeah, but it's invalid because they're defence company that also builds engines, RR is just an engine builder.
The govt will likely bail out Rolls.
Justifying BAe's take over of RR on specious grounds as you've done above is like expecting an ancillary supplier to take over a major car brand. It's not impossible but with the current liabilities it may well doom both parties plus your justification is unjustified & stupid.
I can see the government helping with a BAE SYSTEMS acquisition. And it hasn't been 'BAe' for about 20 years, when they took over GEC Marconi.
 
Yeah, but it's invalid because they're defence company that also builds engines, RR is just an engine builder.


I can see the government helping with a BAE SYSTEMS acquisition. And it hasn't been 'BAe' for about 20 years, when they took over GEC Marconi.
I hope for your sake this doesn't turn out to be a case of you venting on SPECTRA's abilities & calling into question it's very basics only to shut up once you learnt Eurojet's studying & planning to incorporate the very same kind of systems into future iterations. After all, you've a long history of egg on your face on multiple occasions out here, Paddy, for imbecile reasoning.
 
Yeah, but it's invalid because they're defence company that also builds engines, RR is just an engine builder.
You said "civil aircraft engine builder", you don't said "just an engine builder for civil aircraft", and finally RR also build the Typhoon engine which is not a civil aircraft so it is also a defense company.
 
You said "civil aircraft engine builder", you don't said "just an engine builder for civil aircraft", and finally RR also build the Typhoon engine which is not a civil aircraft so it is also a defense company.
So? It's still just an engine builder and obviously civil aviation is a majority of their business, not so for SAFRAN.
I hope for your sake this doesn't turn out to be a case of you venting on SPECTRA's abilities & calling into question it's very basics only to shut up once you learnt Eurojet's studying & planning to incorporate the very same kind of systems into future iterations. After all, you've a long history of egg on your face on multiple occasions out here, Paddy, for imbecile reasoning.
I still question SPECTRA's claims. Such a system can never accomplish as much as true stealth. It can only form part of an overall stealth package.
 
So? It's still just an engine builder and obviously civil aviation is a majority of their business, not so for SAFRAN.


captitalactivitegb.jpg


Defense is only 7 % if you consider Breakdown of revenue by business !
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuriosityRover
I still question SPECTRA's claims. Such a system can never accomplish as much as true stealth. It can only form part of an overall stealth package.
You mean Rafale is a sub par stealth fighter going by your logic yet Eurofighter wants to emulate it.

Right, but half of it is not aerospace propulsion either, so the comparison is invalid.
On behalf of everyone out here, I'd like to see your certificate of graduation once more. I just can't believe you're an engineer. The more I try to avoid you the more the gems you keep posting out here.
 
You mean Rafale is a sub par stealth fighter going by your logic yet Eurofighter wants to emulate it.
Neither are stealth fighters at all, period.

On behalf of everyone out here, I'd like to see your certificate of graduation once more. I just can't believe you're an engineer. The more I try to avoid you the more the gems you keep posting out here.
What's so difficult to understand, half of SAFRAN's business is not aerospace propulsion, whereas nearly all of RR's is. Furthermore the 50% of SAFRAN's business that is aerospace propulsion, part is civil aerospace, part military and part space, hence only a minority is civil aerospace propulsion.
 
Neither are stealth fighters at all, period.
DA never claimed such status for Rafale. They've merely incorporated elements of stealth thru EW & partially thru geometry. Having succeeded in their modest efforts, Eurofighter seems keen to emulate it. Why's that so hard to understand?


What's so difficult to understand, half of SAFRAN's business is not aerospace propulsion, whereas nearly all of RR's is. Furthermore the 50% of SAFRAN's business that is aerospace propulsion, part is civil aerospace, part military and part space, hence only a minority is civil aerospace propulsion.
The issue here is RR in danger of going belly up & the contenders who're in a position to bail it out. You brought in extraneous reasons totally immaterial to the situation at hand & muddied the waters as you so often do when you've no argument.