It is very hard not to get arrested in Russia these days:
Raj is not going to be too happy about this.@randomradio, @Innominate, @Picdelamirand-oil, @RASALGHUL
SAM-SLAM summer series continues. I think the S-400 is just designed to look scary and nothing more, sort of a scarecrow for aircraft.
The strike was carried out using 5 ATACMS ballistic missiles.
Losses:
• 2 S-300/400 air defense missile launchers were destroyed;
• 1 S-300/400 air defense missile launcher was damaged;
• Radar “96L6E” was destroyed;
• The control center of the S-300/400 air defense system was destroyed;
Lost count. Wait until they develop an air-launched ATACMS. The worst part is that they only fired 5 ATACMS and it took out a site that had at least 3 launchers (12 missiles). Anyone who bought S-400s got conned, they should pick upgrade to some old PAC-1s or early PAC-2s or something. @randomradio, @Rajput Lion, @RASALGHULRaj is not going to be too happy about this.
How many batteries past two months alone now?
LIE!!! Everyone knows s500 radar is meant for BM so this dude is wrong AND a liar.Interesting little bit of info. The radar was actually a 96L6-TsP, which some S-400s now use. It is associated with the new S-500.
Russia's S-500 Defense System Is Ready To Launch. Is It the Ultimate F-35 Killer?
What about S-500 makes it so fearsome for stealth fighter jets?interestingengineering.com
Alleged 3,500km detection range.
??? I think Russia has had more than 22.I saw a table in the Ukrainian press showing the number of deaths by foreign country since the start of the war:
- US: 56
- Georgia: 55
- Belarus: 39
- Colombia: 38
- France: 23
- United Kingdom: 22
- Russia: 22
@randomradio, @Rajput Lion, @RASALGHUL, @Picdelamirand-oilLIE!!! Everyone knows s500 radar is meant for BM so this dude is wrong AND a liar.
Great drone footage and ATACMs worked just like the 80's promo video.
22 fighting for Ukraine??? I think Russia has had more than 22.
@randomradio, @Innominate, @Picdelamirand-oil, @RASALGHUL
SAM-SLAM summer series continues. I think the S-400 is just designed to look scary and nothing more, sort of a scarecrow for aircraft.
The strike was carried out using 5 ATACMS ballistic missiles.
Losses:
• 2 S-300/400 air defense missile launchers were destroyed;
• 1 S-300/400 air defense missile launcher was damaged;
• Radar “96L6E” was destroyed;
• The control center of the S-300/400 air defense system was destroyed;
It could also be that all their trained operators are dead, which is also a serious issue.If S400 is unable to reliably shoot down even legacy systems like ATACMS (which don't even do anything special like skip-glide/quasi-ballistic maneuvers etc.) that's a serious issue.
I think the problem is mostly on the sensor side. Russians have struggled to develop modern AESAs to fire control their missiles.