France and Germany do consider it a democracy. That's why Russia is sanctioned by the EU.
Not being a democracy is why it wasn't let into NATO in the first place.
That's because parts of their country were still occupied and there was still concerns about lingering corruption (not as bad as Putin's Russia though, not nearly). India would probably receive the same criticism judged to the same standards. But the fact is their elections were monitored by international observers. Russians disguised as rebels prevented the Donbass from using polling stations during the elections.
Even we have areas of India occupied by enemy states. But the US is desperate to make us an ally.
I don't think you know this, but treaty allies can decline providing help when it comes to disputed areas. Particularly NATO. Only sovereign territories are covered under NATO protection.
It really does matter. A valuable commodity is no good if you have no customers. US, Canada, Europe, Australia, China are about 2/3rds of global consumption. The rest is a deflection from the subject we were discussing, which was, Russia cannot afford to cut of China's gas and China could afford it even if they did. As long as Russia can't get the full price it's a win.
The Russians will always have customers.
Well, why is Europe paying a higher price too then?
Still less than India.
Other factors at play, Russia sold to India for 35% discount, so clearly other producers might increase production due to incentives, especially those annoyed with Russian-supported and Iranian backed insurgencies. Who will buy from Russia after 2024 when Europe has cut ties if Russia tried to stop Chinese supplies? Like I said, it would already have stopped European supplies if it could.
China and India will.