Ukraine - Russia Conflict

RASALGHUL said:
Really! you truly need to see some psychologist. I am not trying to mean, altough i am sure you will get offended. You really want to enjoy A NUCLEAR F***ing WAR.
GO seek some help.
Click to expand...
People who want a nuclear do not understand the full consequences. You don't have to be involved for it to affect you either. Worldwide famine will likely kill well in excess of a billion people after such a war. Countries who already have poor food security will be the worst affected.

RASALGHUL said:
These people are long dead and those who lives cant harm us from thier land.
Also I bet you will not be saying good things about russia if we have shared border with russia.
Click to expand...
You would not exist if you had a border with Russia. Or if you did, you would be like Belarus - in a state of pretending to exist.
jetray said:
then what prevents NATO from doing it? :LOL:
Click to expand...
I blasted the government, you were the one so sure every Russian was on side.
 
BMD said:
I blasted the government, you were the one so sure every Russian was on side.
Click to expand...
??? I don't understand, you wanted all out war b\w NATO & Russia?
Well, That's Certainly stupid.
Didn't Putin said " We will defend Sovereign integrity by "All means Necessary""?
 
RASALGHUL said:
LOL! That's weird argument. So, A flatearther should get away after commiting crime?

HMMMMMM! I agree.
But you have to agree generations of colonizers have great advantages then those who were colonized.
Click to expand...
I think the advantages are greatly exaggerated. Some previously colonised countries have done just fine - Malaysia, Singapore, Hong Kong*, Macau*, Ireland. In fact, the ones that were sort of permanently 'colonised' are doing better than anyone really, if you count the US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. A lot of the time I think it is used as an excuse for 75+ years of bad government. It's much easier to criticise others than to do something constructive.

That's not to say colonialism wasn't hugely exploitive at the time, but there's been plenty of time since to do something constructive. If you take the UK, it was invaded at least 3 times prior to becoming an invader. India had several empires too.

Did US/European wealth come from colonialism or from inventions like the car, aeroplane, jet engine, combustion engine, electric motor, radar, modern rocketry, GPS, telephones, mobile phones, trains....
RASALGHUL said:
OR You have to be as strong (Economically/militarily) as China.:sneaky:
Click to expand...
What about Manchuria?
RASALGHUL said:
??? I don't understand, you wanted all out war b\w NATO & Russia?
Well, That's Certainly stupid.
Didn't Putin said " We will defend Sovereign integrity by "All means Necessary""?
Click to expand...
No. Russia is the only party who chose war.

Sovereign integrity of Russia does not include Ukraine. Chechnya yes, which is why NATO never took a major position on that.
 
Last edited:
BMD said:
What about Manchuria?
Click to expand...
I am Talking about right now..
BMD said:
No. Russia is the only party who chose war.
Click to expand...
Well Putin certainly Disagree.
BMD said:
Sovereign integrity of Russia does not include Ukraine. Chechnya yes, which is why NATO never took a major position on that.
Click to expand...
My point is once vlad annexes donbass, kherson, zapharzhia, etc after referrendum. He will call it a part of russia,just like crimea. And then if Ukraine/Nato tries to reacquire , he might use Nuclear weapons.
 
Wait a minute....
https://twitter.com/x/status/1572492000422948865
chill-math.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BMD
RASALGHUL said:
I am Talking about right now..
Click to expand...
And I'm pointing out that right now would be too late already.

RASALGHUL said:
Well Putin certainly Disagree.
Click to expand...
Putin is a lunatic. Russia didn't start this war in 2022 though, they started it in 2014 by invading Crimea and the Donbass, which is basically like Britain invading Kerala and Tamil Nadu and saying, "well, it once belonged to use for a couple of centuries." They were never theirs then, and they aren't now.

RASALGHUL said:
My point is once vlad annexes donbass, kherson, zapharzhia, etc after referrendum. He will call it a part of russia,just like crimea. And then if Ukraine/Nato tries to reacquire , he might use Nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
The annexations are meaningless to the international community and he won't get away with using nuclear weapons with no comeback. I also wouldn't be surprised if Ukraine is developing nuclear weapons on the quiet right now. They've already had them in the past, they have the know how, and the motivation to do so is there in spades.
Innominate said:
Oops. They got what they wanted, eh?
https://twitter.com/x/status/1572665542892457985
Click to expand...
What amazes me is that they dragged off someone who wanted to go. With police this stupid, it's only a matter of time.
 
Some people (mainly vstol joker and co.) have spoken about how Russia would fair in a nuclear war, saying it's too large to be destroyed. So I should point out that it only has just over 30 cities. And nearly all of the population is concentrated around the south and east. So obliterating Russia only requires about 15% of it to be obliterated.

1663857240205.png
 
Bon Plan said:
NATO is a non offensive first organization.
Click to expand...
so nato only bombs serbia or syria who cannot fight back?
Bon Plan said:
As for now, no NATO country is under the russian fire.
Click to expand...
yeah technically right , Nato dropped its pants instead of accepting ukraine membership.
BMD said:
He said, classical war. Nuclear war is pigeon chess.
Click to expand...
ever heard of the quote, all's fair in lover & war.

so NATO is full of cowards who are afraid to die , but putin is ready to fight to death , so who's the brave here?
War means death, does it matter whether you die by a bullet or by a mortar?
 
BMD said:
Some people (mainly vstol joker and co.) have spoken about how Russia would fair in a nuclear war, saying it's too large to be destroyed. So I should point out that it only has just over 30 cities. And nearly all of the population is concentrated around the south and east. So obliterating Russia only requires about 15% of it to be obliterated.

View attachment 24595
Click to expand...
all talk no action. NATO bullies should stick to syria or libya cant touch russia directly.
 
BMD said:
People who want a nuclear do not understand the full consequences. You don't have to be involved for it to affect you either. Worldwide famine will likely kill well in excess of a billion people after such a war. Countries who already have poor food security will be the worst affected.
Click to expand...
Hah...I see. when was the west worried about the rest of the world?
If west thinks they are fighting a principled war they should take it to its logical conclusion instead of giving stupid selfish excuses that no one cares about.

It is an irony that imperialist & colonialist west who murdered millions by creating famines all over world is concerned about food security of the poor. Nice joke dude. 🤣
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom