Lol. With what manpower are these Russians going to built new cities? Vast majority of Russian population lives near Europe it won't take a lot of nukes to take them out and leave a residue.
Ukraine - Russia Conflict
- Thread starter randomradio
- Start date
NATO very much has the numbers in both regards.
If all the cities are melted who will be left to build in the wastelands of Siberia, and with what?
Number of people per square km.
All the British can do is fire >8 warheads for every city Russia has. Yeah, that's all. Sure the UK gets destroyed but there's not going to be much left of Russia either. There's no way to win a nuclear war, it's suicide, that is what Putin is threatening when he mentions nukes, he's threatening to kill himself and Russia.
Well you've made it clear that you hate the west and want it destroyed, so you are backing Russia as your proxy.
SIPRI data:
Global nuclear arsenals are expected to grow as states continue to modernize–New SIPRI Yearbook out now
(Stockholm, 13 June 2022) SIPRI today launches the findings of SIPRI Yearbook 2022, which assesses the current state of armaments, disarmament and international security. A key finding is that despite a marginal decrease in the number of nuclear warheads in 2021, nuclear arsenals are expected to...
Looking at the "deployed warheads" statistics, meaning the ones that are actually read to use, we get 2144 nukes for NATO, and 1588 for Russia.
As for territorial depth, NATO represents 24.6 million km², Russia represents 17.1 million km². NATO is bigger, surprise.
But Russia's territorial depth is mostly empty land. If you nuke Russian cities, what's left of Russia is not Russia anymore, it becomes terra nullius. NATO is 950 million people (38.6 p/km²), Russia is 150 million people (8.8 p/km²).
And you know who is gonna rebuild new cities in that territory? It will not be Russians, since there won't be any Russian anymore. It will be the Chinese.
Pranam sir
Big fan and follower of yours for quite some time. Must say that your analysis of this war is spot on. Also my eyes got tears reading about your family sacrifices.
What most modern Indians don't understand is this long Western game of civilization domination. After Russia, it's China then it is going to be our term.
People have forgotten our rich past. Also pray for Mother Russia to thrash these Eurotards for good.
Keep your observations going. Reading it is big pleasure
There will come a point where the nation's supplying the equipment will start feeling a severe pinch.
These items are not exactly cheap. And they will need to replace them. And do it while facing energy issues.
USA has too big a reserve, they won't feel it. Its the others who need to worry.
I've pointed out several times that the cost of all support supplied to Ukraine is >1% of GDP, less than 0.5% so far in fact. We can do this forever.
Many of the richer people are choosing this opportunity to get Tesla Powerwalls and ASHP/GSHPs installed, or buy EVs. This naturally reduces the demand for gas and oil. Equally fracking is on the rise again.
Last edited:
Bob him on ignore. Nobody who says they want a nuclear war is worth listening to. There is literally nothing to want about a nuclear war.
Is it 'okay' if you're not involved? Again, let's analyse this. Look at where the Russian cities are:
Now look at where the wheat belt is:
And in the EU.
So the consequences of nuclear war between the 'white racishists' and Russia is hundreds of millions of Africans and Indians and others starving to death (billions in total) and the subsequent collapse of government and law and order. What is there to want about that?
This is just one of the many incalculable consequences.
Last edited:
It ain't @vstol Jockey who is pushing for a nuclear war. The western nations like UK and USA are literally pushing for it by stretching the patience of Russia .
Don't play with fire if you don't want to get burnt
Sustaining the current level of support over next say 4-5 months will be difficult.
Power , fuel and supply line issues will be sorted, no doubt. But the militaries of respective countries will be taking a hit. How big a hit, that remains to be seen.
We need a European MIC effort strong enough to deter Russia without US support. This is a critical requirement.
Putin needs to learn from the mistakes of Hitler. Let war efforts be decided by the people who actually know how to do it.
They current situation is grim. It will eventually lead to disintegration of Russia.
We just need a really weakened Russia, not a disintegrated one.
yeah its a melodramatic macabre scene out of bond movie, every one should die so that west can save the world. We can lend some crappy bollywood heroines to shed some tears to make it look real. (fake western crocodile tear wont cut )
Finally west should be happy that their bond movies are turning out to be real. Villian is out to destroy the whole world , while the british with their stunted dogs which cannot even walk on uneven side walk are out to save it.
europe is more densely populated than russia, which means more causalities. I have stated the same point that russia has nothing much to lose dropping bombs on their empty lands/ underdeveloped is pretty useless, its just like afghanistan with little or no infra. West has more to lose, make your choice.SIPRI data:
Global nuclear arsenals are expected to grow as states continue to modernize–New SIPRI Yearbook out now
(Stockholm, 13 June 2022) SIPRI today launches the findings of SIPRI Yearbook 2022, which assesses the current state of armaments, disarmament and international security. A key finding is that despite a marginal decrease in the number of nuclear warheads in 2021, nuclear arsenals are expected to...sipri.org
Looking at the "deployed warheads" statistics, meaning the ones that are actually read to use, we get 2144 nukes for NATO, and 1588 for Russia.
As for territorial depth, NATO represents 24.6 million km², Russia represents 17.1 million km². NATO is bigger, surprise.
But Russia's territorial depth is mostly empty land. If you nuke Russian cities, what's left of Russia is not Russia anymore, it becomes terra nullius. NATO is 950 million people (38.6 p/km²), Russia is 150 million people (8.8 p/km²).
And you know who is gonna rebuild new cities in that territory? It will not be Russians, since there won't be any Russian anymore. It will be the Chinese.
If russia loses and china gains, you still got another problem.
But why the heck would we bomb Russia's empty land? I told you: bomb Moscow, and you destroy Russia. Russia is actually Muscovy. As soon as you leave the greater Moscow region, you're not in Russia anymore. You're in one of a thousand colonized territory of a non-Russian ethnicity. So we've only got a dozen or so of Russian cities to destroy and then Russia is gone forever.
Nope! We won't have a problem cause in your scenario, we'll be dead! And problems are for living people only. The dead don't care.
That way, we won't be able to help you when China invades India. And by your own logic:
India has more to lose! So congratulations, by being a Russia shill, you are actively supporting the annihilation of India by China!