Ukraine - Russia Conflict


That applies only when one is very sure about who the oppressor is and who the victim is.

The Third World sees this war as a result of NATO's oppression, and Russia defending itself pre-emptively.

So our neutrality is basically us saying we don't care who the oppressor or victim is, just finish it quickly so the world can go back to normal.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jetray
@ randomradio What do you think of this? Do you think that the person is paid by RT or genuine?

It's geniune. There were multiple reports of Azovs shooting at civilians in exit corridors.

UAF policy was to prevent evacuation of cities in order to create maximum casualties. The RAF had to slowly rescue them as they took the city. The Azovs are major war criminals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RASALGHUL
That applies only when one is very sure about who the oppressor is and who the victim is.

The Third World sees this war as a result of NATO's oppression, and Russia defending itself pre-emptively.

So our neutrality is basically us saying we don't care who the oppressor or victim is, just finish it quickly so the world can go back to normal.
IMO Russia is in the wrong.
As far as I understand, after Euromaidan revolution Ukrainian govt didn't rein in Militias/parties like Svoboda, Right Sektor, AZOV who were terrorizing Russian speaking population in Ukraine.
Russia Obviously Siezed this oppurtunity for justifying this war.
Again Russia do not care about these(Russian speaking) people, it just want to punish ukraine.
SIMILARLY WEST also see this as golden oppurtunity to bleed russia militariy, Economically, west also do not care about ukraine.
But Again Russia shouldn't have invaded ukraine.
THis invasion is just wrong.
 
FgedyExXEAA81-6

7 is inevitable. Gotta see what his successor is capable of, for better or worse.

4 will take care of 3, 5 and 6 by default.

1 and 2 will not happen without a NATO invasion. And without 1 and 2, the other numbers are useless.
Wow, so 3 basically states that Russia had removed linguistic rights in Russia but was complaining about Ukrainian being made mandatory in the Ukrainian public sector. :ROFLMAO: @randomradio

Yes, the Russians are a-holes that way. We all know that. But the minute a democracy does that, it leads to civil war.
 
🤣 how are they going to enforce it if is secret.


Captain America Lol GIF by mtv

By lying about the numbers mobilised. It's normal.

They claim 300,000, but it could even be 100,000 or even 1,000,000. It's impossible to tell. This will keep the enemy guessing. The Soviets did that during WW2 as well, took the Germans by surprise when nearly 5 million men showed up in 6 months when they thought only 500,000 will.

While not the SU, the Russians can still mobilise a lot of men.

All this talk of weapons and equipment shortage for the infantry was 'fake', more accurately, men mobilised faster than equipment, that's all. Just a logistics issue.

We will do the same in a long war too. It's normal to buy ammo and weapons from countries not fighting wars. The Russians are buying ammo from NoKo.
 
The CAESAR is a kind of sniper gun. But the construction is tricky:
  • The steel is very special, the production is complicated and a significant part of the cast ingots are discarded. The grade to be produced is difficult to achieve.
  • The shaping of the preforms is time-consuming, due to the characteristics of the steel and in order not to change the properties of the metal.
  • The drilling of the barrel is complicated because of the length. We are at the limit of what we know how to do.
  • The machining of the chamber is very sensitive, there is only one machine and it takes expert workers (precise machining by hand and control of each pass with a laser). The slightest overshoot in depth and the barrel is downgraded (a year's work in the bin)
  • the barrel is then straightened by a specialised company, to ensure concentricity and straightness, also a manual operation.
Basically we can do faster with more tolerance but we lose the precision of the gun, no more caesar "sniper".

The real question is how quickly it can be repaired, field and rear areas.
 
No one would have cared about Assange and Snowden if the West only spoke the truth.
Assange was a rapist and Snowden was a traitor at the end of the day. Russia would simply have poisoned both of them. When you leak classified information it's an offence, even if the contents aren't really that revealing. I mean, let me ask, what's the most controversial of any of their leaks?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RASALGHUL
Lockdowns. They don't have herd immunity like we do now.
But they do like being herded. It seems to be more linked to the war than lockdowns, could be something to do with them bankrolling Russia. Ukraine isn't just fighting Russia now, it's fighting all the axes powers - Iran providing drones, Syria and Wagnerite states providing people, North Korea providing ammunition, and China providing money. A coalition of the evil.
 
That applies only when one is very sure about who the oppressor is and who the victim is.
How can one not be sure in this case? Russia invaded Crimea and the Donbass in 2014 and then invaded all of Ukraine in 2022. Then you have all the random deaths in Russia. Like I said, Assange and Snowden would not even still be alive had their leaks been about Russia. Also very strange that Assange's 'leaks' were in no way neutral, there seemed to be a vested interest behind them.
The Third World sees this war as a result of NATO's oppression, and Russia defending itself pre-emptively.
That's why the Third World is the Third World, they don't think too well. Who was NATO oppressing in Europe exactly? Has NATO previously annexed any territories in Europe like Russia has both before 1991 and after? They should take some opinions from Eastern Europeans unless they wish to come across as being thick.
So our neutrality is basically us saying we don't care who the oppressor or victim is, just finish it quickly so the world can go back to normal.
No, your 'neutrality' - speaking about you personally - is actually a pro-Russian stance, not neutrality at all, and is grounded in an illogical continuance of hatred of the West for historical reasons.
 
Last edited:
IMO Russia is in the wrong.
As far as I understand, after Euromaidan revolution Ukrainian govt didn't rein in Militias/parties like Svoboda, Right Sektor, AZOV who were terrorizing Russian speaking population in Ukraine.
Russia Obviously Siezed this oppurtunity for justifying this war.
Again Russia do not care about these(Russian speaking) people, it just want to punish ukraine.
SIMILARLY WEST also see this as golden oppurtunity to bleed russia militariy, Economically, west also do not care about ukraine.
But Again Russia shouldn't have invaded ukraine.
THis invasion is just wrong.

Donbas fell into unrest long before that because of the militias. The militias came first. The problem is the West created the environment that forced Russia to invade. Ukraine was a red line.

Whether Russia invaded or not, whether it was right or wrong, they should have finished it within a week, or at best a month. Not this circus.

Other than that, the Russians are imperialists, so they intend to recreate the SU.