www.forbes.com
Ability to force your enemy to go cold and defensive is very important in BVR combat. Honestly, had Su-34s succeeded in SEAD/DEAD, then Su-35S and Su-30SM would have turned mince-meat of Ukrainian air force. But because of S-300 they can't go close and hunt them down.Forbes said the R 37M's hard kill was not much, mainly to force the Ukrainian aircraft to turn, which is consistent with what I said about its lack of motilityRussia’s Best Missile Can Hit Ukrainian Jets From 80 Miles Away. But Ukrainian Pilots Know How To Dodge.
“We created different tactics for how to avoid this missile—and that’s why it’s not so succesful against our jets,” Ukrainian Mikoyan MiG-29 pilot “Juice” told Lithuanian broadcaster Delfi.
The biggest revelation of the war was that the SEAD mission required a variety of aircraft, and the Su-34 was not very good, Suppressing the Soviet-era S 300V is still possible, but Russia lacks the relevant electronic warfare equipment and sophisticated C 4I capabilities, If Russia had a few J 16d and Y 9g, the outcome would be very different
'Tons of explosives.' Sorry @randomradio, you're wrong again. Becoming something of a pattern.You literally believe what took to destroy the dam was a single 5T box packed with explosives? Where did you get that from, Looney Tunes?
Let's put this in perspective, Russia was losing dozens of BMPs per day during its major offensives. It was using them up faster than a family with diarrhoea uses sheets of toilet paper.
Su-34 failed because Russia doesn't have advance targeting pods and lack of PGMs and LGBs. Going down low to target your enemy with dumb bombs is so retarded in this age and time, especially when your enemy has dense IADS and plethora of MANPADs. Only Rafale can make this low and fast work because of its uncanny ability to fly extremely low and extremely fast plus using Hammer on its target.
Lol, no. Tanks will evolve to tackle the new threats. This is war, jets will be shot and tanks destroyed. What else did you expect?
Russia does lack targeting pods, but this is mainly used for close support, Russia didn't attack the S 300 with iron bombs, Russia has enough KH 31,What Russia lacks is the ability to pinpoint the Ukrainian S 300 and lacks the soft kill，Russia lacks something like the ALQ 184 or EA 18G，Does the Rafale have a dedicated SEAD missile?
nrg800.users.earthengine.app
French air force reintegrated the SEAD mission into its competencies by using the resources of the SPECTRA electronic warfare system combined with the SAR mode (synthetic aperture radar calculating a radar image of the ground) of the Rafale's RBE2 radar, which makes it possible to guide a non-specialised munition (GBU or AASM) on the coordinates of the enemy's defence radar emission.
Targeting pods like Litening allow to pin-point SAM batteries, troop formation and other high value static or stationary targets. This is a big miss, IMO.
Yes, but thanks to Rafale's low level penetration ability and SPECTRA, Rafale achieves DEAD better than most planes. It also has Scalp-EG to attack from standalone distance.
This weapon should be within 20KM of the target, which is very dangerous, even if the anti-aircraft gun can shoot you down, SAR patterns are common, and most radars haveFrench air force reintegrated the SEAD mission into its competencies by using the resources of the SPECTRA electronic warfare system combined with the SAR mode (synthetic aperture radar calculating a radar image of the ground) of the Rafale's RBE2 radar, which makes it possible to guide a non-specialised munition (GBU or AASM) on the coordinates of the enemy's defence radar emission.
Multi-Role Carrier Borne Fighter For The Indian Navy - Updates & Discussions
Nobody cares who you believe. My interventions are not for you but for reasonable people who may be confused by your misinformation. Such misinformation, like quoting your politicians and general. :eek: I actually missed that he first said F4.2 that he was actually referring to F5 for SEAD...www.strategicfront.org
This is equivalent to air bombing, and Russia's use of iron bombs what is the difference, but you throw a bit accurate, even the United States is developing AGM88G,Scalp-EG is a cruise missile similar to AKF 98A and AGM 158，Not anti-radiation munitions
