They are getting dozens of launchers. You can't compare HiMARS/GMLRS as rocket artillery like Russia and Ukraine has they should be considered more like air support carrying precision SDB's. These are sniper weapons. They don't need to launch a salvo to hit a target. If they find a group of Russian armored vehicles parked close to each other being replenished all it takes is one air bursting 60 feet above them to take them out. Ukraine finds a Russian command post one rocket is all they will need instead of a salvo. If Ukraine locates 12 static targets one 50kms, other 60kms, 70kms, 80kms, 90kms, with 7 other targets 200 meters from these targets Ukraine would need one launcher carrying 12 rockets or two HiMARS.
That's why Ukraine getting these weapons is going to change the battlefield heavily towards Ukraine's favor once deployed. Russian's know this which is why they are crapping their pants.
It really is going to get ugly for Russian forces soon.
Dude, you don't know what you're talking about.
There was an initial burst of excitement when the US said they will supply MLRS. But the expectation was ATACMs and PrSM will be supplied along with the rockets. This would have allowed Ukraine to hit targets inside Russia. But that didn't happen, so now it's just another MLRS.
If this system has to be effective, the delivery should be in the dozens, not just a handful.
The Ukrainians are asking for 60 launchers at the minimum, while NATO only wants to deliver about 8-12 or so. The Russians have hundreds of these launchers and they even fire those special guided rockets that you were bragging about. To put it in perspective, India will have 22 regiments of a system that's equivalent to the M270 called Pinaka by the end of the decade, meant to replace the Grad. That's 396 operational launchers, not counting reserves. And this doesn't include Smerch launchers, which are well above 150.
So you really think 4 HIMARS launchers are gonna do anything?
That's only a subset of food. Plenty of their grain comes from the EU and US too and the majority of their food imports overall is from US and EU. Grain is not everything.
There is a food crisis because any disruption to supply causes that in areas where food security is low but Russia does not have some kind of monopoly. But they would certainly like to engineer a famine to hold people hostage.
The Russian casualties are equally high or higher and Ukraine has no choice but to fight, Russia doesn't need to however much BS they choose the spin.
Did, you are blind and deluded.
They will move between the two. Russia hasn't taken only the Russian dominant regions.
View attachment 23932
And it wouldn't matter if they had, they are in Ukraine's country. The insurgency will take place, both in Ukraine and likely in Russia too. If Ukraine were prepared to cede part of their country they'd have already done it. The Russian military has dug a black hole for themselves which will just feed on them endlessly.
Okay, so you're decided there's no food crisis then. Good. Remember this post. The rest of your post is a waste of time.


