ATGM launchers on the side? Or maybe loitering munitions.
ATGM launchers on the side? Or maybe loitering munitions.
I hope so. Doesn't make sense to produce multiple hull designs.The same hull might be used for FICV and SPADGMS.
Both depending on the role.ATGM launchers on the side? Or maybe loitering munitions.
ANI report mentioned loitering munition.ATGM launchers on the side? Or maybe loitering munitions.
Tank battles are not fought as the one turning out in Ukraine.Real threat is FPV Drones in future.
I hope it gets derailed. PT76s will shoot these down. Heck BMP2s will shoot these down.Considering level of dalali i won't be surprised if it gets derailed as well.
Role here is to support Infantry not go on 1 on 1 Tank Battle with heavy MBT + additional protection can be provided by reactive Armour & no way this thing Weigh just 25 Tonne......this light tank dimension are quite huge for a light tank.I hope it gets derailed. PT76s will shoot these down. Heck BMP2s will shoot these down.
A tank is an IFV if it's frontal arc protection is not good enough for it to lead an armoured thrust.
As of now this light tank is a glorified IFV.
If you look in to the last 35 years of war, you will see that tanks always destroyed in huge numbers against. The era of tank warfare is over, the cheap air to surface ammunition , surface to surface ammunition & now the cheap drones are doing havoc over modern battle tanks.Tank battles are not fought as the one turning out in Ukraine.
An armoured push occurs within combined arms strategy. Mobile VSHORADS are a concept tested in US led push into Iraq in 90s and work well if implemented.
The frontal arc protection on the other hand is something which cannot be compensated by any other way.
If you look in to the last 35 years of war, you will see that tanks always destroyed in huge numbers against. The era of tank warfare is over, the cheap air to surface ammunition , surface to surface ammunition & now the cheap drones are doing havoc over modern battle tanks.
Tank battles are not fought as the one turning out in Ukraine.
An armoured push occurs within combined arms strategy. Mobile VSHORADS are a concept tested in US led push into Iraq in 90s and work well if implemented.
The frontal arc protection on the other hand is something which cannot be compensated by any other way.
Ofcourse I agree with the weight figure, every modern European IFV capable of holding off 20mm AP round weighs more than 35tons.I would guess to be around 32-34 tons with full load up. Its a proto at present, no doubt weight reduction effort will follow later which is habitual of CVRDE. But it can do some job.
No light tank on earth can weight 25 tons, blue label generals are too dumb to understand this, I bet they will drag this tank for years due to weight issue.Ofcourse I agree with the weight figure, every modern European IFV capable of holding off 20mm AP round weighs more than 35tons.
The efforts should not be on reducing the weight. But on making it survivable.
A 45 ton modern tank with atleast T72 type protection is better than a 25 ton tank everyday from Earth to Moon.
If this concept was anything near a success, we wouldn't be seeing 30-35 ton light tanks of US, China, Turkey -Indonesia