There's no guarantee of that. We will know for sure only when details emerge.
For example, our ASAT sits between SM-3 Block 1B and Block 2A as of today, although it's the same size as the GBI. It needs upgrades if it is to surpass the SM-3 Block 2A, and even more so if it's to match the GBI. So, whether AD-2 will match or exceed SM-3 B2A, in turn our ASAT, that's to be seen.
Altitudes
SM-3 B1A/B = 500-600Km
SM-3 B2A = 1500Km
GBI = 2000Km
ASAT = 300Km demonstrated, 800-1200Km claimed. Requires upgrades to surpass SM-3 and GBI. We are gonna need our own ASAT Mk1A/ Mk2 etc.
So even if AD-2 is bigger, I have no clue if the objective is to stop missiles at altitudes of above IRBM class weapons, where we already have the ASAT. Agni III's apogee is 500Km, IV is at 900Km and V is at 600Km. DF-21's apogee is 500Km. DF-26's should be somewhere between 500-1000Km as well, I believe it should be around 500-600Km though. So we need a missile that sits between SM-3 B1 and 2. But this is for midcourse interception. For terminal, we don't need more than 300Km altitude. A bigger design doesn't necessarily mean there's an overlap in capabilities, especially when we do not know the role of AD-2 yet.
It's small enough to fit in the VLS of ships, and can reach an altitude of 1500Km, which is enough to stop many types of ICBMs.
We don't know it's true potential yet such large missile with huge KV should travel further.It's still an unclear statement. India has operational capability or has capability to develop, both mean different things.
To stop all kinds of ICBMs, even future ones, we need the ability to reach up to 2500Km. ASAT will have to be further developed to reach this capability.
We don't know it's true potential yet such large missile with huge KV should travel further.
I still believe AD 2 will be our mid course interceptor.
Its heavy,because your missile technology & fuel grain quality is not as good as that of NATO, china & Russia. There is no room for conspiracy theory on our missile range, who wants to announce your strategic weapon delivery mechanism's range as low? No one.We don't know it's true potential yet such large missile with huge KV should travel further.
I still believe AD 2 will be our mid course interceptor.
You better keep your exfart analysis with yourself.Its heavy,because your missile technology & fuel grain quality is not as good as that of NATO, china & Russia. There is no room for conspiracy theory on our missile range, who wants to announce your strategic weapon delivery mechanism's range as low? No one.
You have nothing else to reply, rt?You better keep your exfart analysis with yourself.
We have a 150km SAM (derived from Barak 8) and a 250km SAM (dervied from AAD) already under development known as LR-SAM and XR-SAM.That fin section at the end looks familiar,
could we slightly modify it and turn into a long range sam variant? like 150km+
2 things can be guessed.Specifications ?
I suspect that the fin section might be used on XRSAM.That fin section at the end looks familiar,
could we slightly modify it and turn into a long range sam variant? like 150km+
We don't have anything as such. It's a seperate Israeli program. We are not partner in it.We have a 150km SAM (derived from Barak 8)