Pralay part no orders were getting released by BDL few months ago, fair few items. All under limited bidding so was not possible to judge.
No one knows, the article which confirmed the AoN said the missiles are being mass produced.So not yet ordered? That's sad. 370 missiles will take a long time to be produced.
Hope so but MoD report only mentions AoN and selection of DcPP for trials. 370 of them will need CCS clearance no?No one knows, the article which confirmed the AoN said the missiles are being mass produced.
Its not ordered only AoN. Same status for LRLACM.No one knows, the article which confirmed the AoN said the missiles are being mass produced.
@marich01 @Rajput Lion @Ashwin how capable do you reckon Chinese HQ19 is in terms of intercepting our Pralays? As for HQ9B I doubt it can intercept even Prithvis flying in quasi ballistic trajectory.
I have no idea tbh. Missiles often fail than get intercepted. Actual story proven via various means of proof rarely exist. It is quite hard to intercept something that is flying near parallel to earth surface than something coming towards the earth surface from above space in an easily calculated trajectory.@marich01 @Rajput Lion @Ashwin how capable do you reckon Chinese HQ19 is in terms of intercepting our Pralays? As for HQ9B I doubt it can intercept even Prithvis flying in quasi ballistic trajectory.
Its a 5 ton missile. Meaning you can carry only one with 8x8. If the user asks they can easily do it.Does the plan for 8x8 TEL still exist ?
Chinese systems are very capable. HQ19 is their dedicated BMD and ASAT system. However, without going into specifics I would just say that Pralay is an extremely difficult missile to intercept. Just leave it at that@marich01 @Rajput Lion @Ashwin how capable do you reckon Chinese HQ19 is in terms of intercepting our Pralays? As for HQ9B I doubt it can intercept even Prithvis flying in quasi ballistic trajectory.

Ah @hellbent would have explained that precisely.You guys notice the weird launch trajectory? It looked like it did some sort of “manoeuvre” upon launch (thrust vectoring?). Why would that be required right at the time of launch?
Ah @hellbent would have explained that precisely.
I wonder if its doing the old pruthvi flight trajectory shaping via aerodynamic control by deploying control actuation. So instead of a pure ballistic flight, it will fly in a non-ballistic flight path. So even if some battlefield radar picks it up, it will be able to track it but the AD system will not be able to engage it, due to every possible calculated interception point becoming invalid thereafter due to this trajectory shaping. This way the missile is able to defeat both the direct interception as well as cross-over interception attempt (ie salvo AD firing of 2, we all have seen such videos) and have an increased range.