Agriculture in India : News, Updates, Discussion & Analysis

Then why are they so scared for removal of MSP?? The excess production is bought by the government and then rots in warehouses.
MSP is minimum support price not maximum. If grain prices will not cover the production cost, then how can agriculture sector survive. If we have surplus grain, then motivate farmers to switch to other agriculture products like vegetable oil crops by incentivising them, but not by destroying farmers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pawan
. In the open market, small farmers can't compete with big farmers and why would a private player buy crops from small farmers.
Because we don't need small farmers. It's bitter pill to swallow but we can't waste land on small farmers that can't compete they will have to change their business. Either that or they will have to grow niche crops instead. Like soybean.
What would happen if they bring a clause regarding quality of crop, who is going to decide that. And farmers cannot control quality of crops.
Well that is how business happens. You guys cry about OFB and HAL making shitty quality products and then cry. Why can't the company have quality clauses for buying crops?
Do you buy rotten vegetables to empathise with the poor BMW riding farmers of Punjab? If you do you should get yourself checked to psychiatrist.
U r saying 2 dollar company will be outcompeted by better paying company. U know right that some companies are paying very less amount and they are still in buisness, its also similar to big farmers(more output) and small farmers (less output).
I will give you a great example for company that paid heavily for this. Remember Boeing they did exactly this for their 737 MAX and they outsourced their code for their mission computer if I'm not wrong to a cheap indian IT company and because of that have lost a major chunk of their civilian market to Airbus.
MSP is minimum support price not maximum. If grain prices will not cover the production cost, then how can agriculture sector survive. If we have surplus grain, then motivate farmers to switch to other agriculture products like vegetable oil crops by incentivising them, but not by destroying farmers.
MSP is not being removed though?? So why all the hoolabaloo??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parthu
Because we don't need small farmers. It's bitter pill to swallow but we can't waste land on small farmers that can't compete they will have to change their business. Either that or they will have to grow niche crops instead. Like soybean.
😂 Nice, majority of Indian farmers are small farmers only. And u were saying majority of protestors are not farmers, if u r snatching their livelihood away, they will protest.
Do you buy rotten vegetables to empathise with the poor BMW riding farmers of Punjab? If you do you should get yourself checked to psychiatrist.
I have asked who will decide the quality of crop then, what would happen if private company said this crop doesnt look good, I will pay u less but quality of that crop is ok.

MSP is not being removed though?? So why all the hoolabaloo?
for private option, there is no MSP.
 
Industrialization does not mean destruction of farming sector. You mean promotion of Industrialization by righting off 150 lakh crore bank loans of large Industrialists in last 1 year?
It means exactly that. Since all the non-performing assets are weeded out and have to urbanise or change their business. More farming land is useless if you can't exploit it properly. And for that you need modern machinery and techniques for which you need elementary education to successfully exploit it. This doesn't happen with majority of Indian farmers.
China lost its agriculture strength to became a net food importer in the process of industrialising. Agriculture is what feudal societies do and is indirectly why the inequality due to caste system still continues..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parthu
Arre bhaiya if the situation is so dire in Bihar why aren't they protesting for reinstating msp? Bihari migrants have forever been emigrating out for various kind of jobs from migrant labour to engineering and service related jobs. The land just doesn't give as much opportunities because of lack of development. You keep shifting goalposts every time I point out the statistic which says otherwise. Same for U.P.
Bihar never experienced the fruits of the Green revolution at the level Punjab did. Bihar doesn't have the level of well made irrigation system Punjab has. Bihar is nowhere as Water Rich or electrically rich as Punjab is. Bihar has been an impoverished state since before independence and continues to be the worst performers. If your model was so archaic and bad. The bihari farmer would be constantly committing suicide. That simply doesn't happen.
Punjab is just a poor performer now and have resisted to reformView attachment 18800
It just can't compete. And is using socialist doles to continue to use a system which supports the bicholiyas and not the farmers...

State of bihari farmers doesnt look good
 
Nice, majority of Indian farmers are small farmers only. And u were saying majority of protestors are not farmers, if u r snatching their livelihood away, they will protest.
When did I say there were no farmers? I said the loudest of them were not farmers. The small farmers are ignorant idiots who don't understand the difference. MSP is not being removed the act is giving them freedom to sell to whoever they want breaking apmc monopoly. The farmers can still sell to the apmc. The government can still set msp if they want. It's just not part of the act. And it should be the case..

It's my opinion that small farmers should be completely removed and industrialisation be boosted. A different argument.
You need to improve your comprehension skills.
 
It means exactly that. Since all the non-performing assets are weeded out and have to urbanise or change their business. More farming land is useless if you can't exploit it properly. And for that you need modern machinery and techniques for which you need elementary education to successfully exploit it. This doesn't happen with majority of Indian farmers.
China lost its agriculture strength to became a net food importer in the process of industrialising. Agriculture is what feudal societies do and is indirectly why the inequality due to caste system still continues..
Indian GDP growth is -23 and farming sector is only sector that's actually growing at +4 and you want to destroy it? Almost 60% workforce is related to agriculture sector and you want to destroy them? Is this your model of sustainable growth? We don't want this type of Industrialization, where humanity lost in numbers. Can you give me an example of any country which become developed by destroying their farmers? You are telling that China became a net agriculture importer, still you want to destroy Indian farmers who are producing surplus food. There is dichotomy in your argument, on one hand your claiming these laws will revolutionize agriculture sector and increase production and on the other hand you are claiming that excessive food grain is already decaying in Govt godowns!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaktimaan
Indian GDP growth is -23 and farming sector is only sector that's actually growing at +4 and you want to destroy it? Almost 60% workforce is related to agriculture sector and you want to destroy them? Is this your model of sustainable growth? We don't want this type of Industrialization, where humanity lost in numbers. Can you give me an example of any country which become developed by destroying their farmers? You are telling that China became a net agriculture importer, still you want to destroy Indian farmers who are producing surplus food. There is dichotomy in your argument, on one hand your claiming these laws will revolutionize agriculture sector and increase production and on the other hand you are claiming that excessive food grain is already decaying in Govt godowns!
All of the major industrialised economies had to experience it. From China,Russia to SoKo all of them industrialised under totalitarian governments or monarchies. The only unique case being U.S which had a head start. India cannot industrialise simply because it's a democracy and these useless protest will continue to happen. Only small countries can have sustainable development like Denmark and Switzerland and they have a much larger output than an Indian farmer. If you want rapid industrialization you can't experience it with this emotional jumla. It's a painful process. You can't have sustainable development and industrialisation at the same time. We have missed the train already though. Indira could have done it. Now it's just too late..

The laws aren't implemented so how do you know they aren't performing well. They haven't abolished apmc's just given them a freedom to sell wherever they want to. The case of Bihar isn't even bad. Most of them were unaffected because they were subsistence farmers.
The rotting surplus grain coming from Punjab and Haryana. Opening it to the Private market avoids the wastage of this surplus grain. That surplus grain is useless if you can't export it or sell it..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and Parthu
Because we don't need small farmers. It's bitter pill to swallow but we can't waste land on small farmers that can't compete they will have to change their business. Either that or they will have to grow niche crops instead. Like soybean.

Well that is how business happens. You guys cry about OFB and HAL making shitty quality products and then cry. Why can't the company have quality clauses for buying crops?
Do you buy rotten vegetables to empathise with the poor BMW riding farmers of Punjab? If you do you should get yourself checked to psychiatrist.

I will give you a great example for company that paid heavily for this. Remember Boeing they did exactly this for their 737 MAX and they outsourced their code for their mission computer if I'm not wrong to a cheap indian IT company and because of that have lost a major chunk of their civilian market to Airbus.

MSP is not being removed though?? So why all the hoolabaloo??
India is not US or AUS, where you can have only large farmers. India is many times more population with 1/2 or 1/3 land mass as compared to the mentioned countries.

Last I checked, India is still free and democratic country, where Govts are elected by the people for the people not for corporate houses. Its not dictatorship like communist China, USSR or Nazi Germany, where Mody dictator will decide the fate of its citizens. We will bitterly oppose any undemocratic policies and regulations of dictator Mody.
 
India is not US or AUS, where you can have only large farmers. India is many times more population with 1/2 or 1/3 land mass as compared to the mentioned countries.

Last I checked, India is still free and democratic country, where Govts are elected by the people for the people not for corporate houses. Its not dictatorship like communist China, USSR or Nazi Germany, where Mody dictator will decide the fate of its citizens. We will bitterly oppose any undemocratic policies and regulations of dictator Mody.
We don't need small farmers. You wish those Gandhian fairy tales were true but it's all bullshit.
India is a free and democratic country also it's a undeveloped shithole. So don't blame the government for your Sub-Saharan living standards. Its entirely democratic for the people of india living like pathetic scum.

Ofcourse giving freedom to farmers to sell to whoever they want is undemocratic and fascist. Totally buddy. Please protest and block roads for the bmw riding farmers of punjab..
 
All of the major industrialised economies had to experience it. From China,Russia to SoKo all of them industrialised under totalitarian governments or monarchies. The only unique case being U.S which had a head start. India cannot industrialise simply because it's a democracy and these useless protest will continue to happen. Only small countries can have sustainable development like Denmark and Switzerland and they have a much larger output than an Indian farmer. If you want rapid industrialization you can't experience it with this emotional jumla. It's a painful process. You can't have sustainable development and industrialisation at the same time. We have missed the train already though. Indira could have done it. Now it's just too late..

The laws aren't implemented so how do you know they aren't performing well. They haven't abolished apmc's just given them a freedom to sell wherever they want to. The case of Bihar isn't even bad. Most of them were unaffected because they were subsistence farmers.
The rotting surplus grain coming from Punjab and Haryana. Opening it to the Private market avoids the wastage of this surplus grain. That surplus grain is useless if you can't export it or sell it..
Why you need to abolish APMCs and involve private sector for export, Govt can export on its own. Even use private sector for export only. If you accept that we have surplus grain and its already rotting then why do you claiming to increase production through these reforms? What is the logic? Thank God, India is a democracy and not totalitarian state. Totalitarian states paid a heavy price for development in the form of deaths of millions of its people.
 
We don't need small farmers. You wish those Gandhian fairy tales were true but it's all bullshit.
India is a free and democratic country also it's a undeveloped shithole. So don't blame the government for your Sub-Saharan living standards. Its entirely democratic for the people of india living like pathetic scum.

Ofcourse giving freedom to farmers to sell to whoever they want is undemocratic and fascist. Totally buddy. Please protest and block roads for the bmw riding farmers of punjab..
Farmers already has freedom to sell anywhere they want to sell. You have problem with farming sector or farmer's BMW? You are claiming to increase earning of these farmers through these reforms but on the other hand you have problem with already well earning farmers? Yes we will block roads for Maybach riding oligarchs and their a million's jacket wearing jumlebaz 'paaltoos'!
 
Why you need to abolish APMCs and involve private sector for export, Govt can export on its own. Even use private sector for export only. If you accept that we have surplus grain and its already rotting then why do you claiming to increase production through these reforms? What is the logic? Thank God, India is a democracy and not totalitarian state. Totalitarian states paid a heavy price for development in the form of deaths of millions of its people.
I would love to remove apmc but the government isn't removing them. The farmers can directly sell to whoever they want that is the act. The rest is your delusions. It's all the msp drama everybody is freaking out about. Which is on the government to decide . Since msp is not dependent on the law. So calm your tits.
Also we are paying a heavy price for not developing fast enough. The lack of state monopoly of violence has led to so many separatist movements that's what your freedom has given. India is not as free as your delusions let you percieve. We are a communist republic in a sense more than any thing. With Marxist chomus like you it's completely logical why we suck. And BJP is just a sanghi communist party at the end of the day.

I'm not debating you further on the farmer crap since you and that shaktimaan are happy in your delusions. You guys keep shifting goal posts and it's annoying. It's like talking to a wall. I just hope they crush this joke of a protest with extreme prejudice...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and Parthu
State of bihari farmers doesnt look good
Screenshot_20201208-022950__01.jpg


They are outperforming national average in agricultural growth regulatory for the last decade.
 
View attachment 18802

They are outperforming national average in agricultural growth regulatory for the last decade.
Brewery industry-Farmer Unions-Punjabi Landlord nexus must be delt with for good for any meaningful development in Agri sector otherwise Farmers will keep doing suicides(murder in my opinion) and aur Socialist Con gress and Farrari driving Samajwadi Netas will keep minting money
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78
Landholdings are getting smaller every year due to division of assets in families

But small landholders or small farmers cannot invest in Modern technology like drip irrigation and mechanisation or fertilisers

So private capital has to step in

In ten years time we will have to feed 1.5 BILLION people
 
The simple bottomline is that if Farmers income does not increase
Then BJP is screwed

It is NOT a rocket science

So the government will have to make sure that their intended reforms do actually bring good results before the Next election 😂
 
MSP is a minimum amount and it is decided each time, then how will govt would go bankrupt trying to procure a crop that is already at its minimum price. And why u wanted to take MSP out of the equation, This rate is to safeguard the farmer to a minimum profit for the harvest, if the open market has a lesser price than the cost incurred.
And MSP is necessary, who will guarantee that private players are not buying crops at very low amount. U know all the risks associated with the farming.

What would happen if govt brings a law stating private companies can hire an employee at any salary and they start paying then 2 dollars per day.
In case you haven't noticed, the agitating farmers have demanded that the GoI incorporate MSP into the said act.

Haven't you checked out the total cost to the Exchequer the GoI shells out towards MSP which in turn exists only for food grains principally for rice & wheat which both Punjab & Haryana produce inefficiently with free power & water & heavily subsidised fertilizers especially given that rice is a water intensive crop not suited for growth there?

But since the FCI picks up most of the produce of P&H at MSP which in turn goes up each year, the vicious cycle continues. Moreover if MSP is your demand, why not raise the issue with the state government since Capt Amarinder Singh has already passed legislation negating the central laws. Let him put his money where his mouth is.

If you bring up the argument about MSP, tomorrow the state would have to subsidise every farmer for every crop be it grains, pulses, fruits, horticulture, etc. - the logic being why should only a few crops in selected areas of the country benefit at the cost of others.Apart from GoI lacking the finances & the fact that ot makes for bad economics just for argument's sake, if the GoI agrees , are you prepared to shell out additional money in taxes to make up the short fall?

Finally, minimum wage in industry & MSP aren't related. By that token just as a farmer asks for an MSP, what if industrialists from big & MSME sector start asking for a similar guaranteed price as subsidy from the GoI? Besides, while we're on MSP, Are the agricultural labourers in P&H paid as per the minimum wages act ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and Lolwa