ROFL:
http://aviationweek.com/farnborough...reps-meet-discuss-britain-s-future-fighter-uk
One day following the announcement of Britain’s future combat air system (FCAS) effort, known as Tempest, U.S. Air Force officials plan to discuss the project this week with UK officials.
Tempest was revealed on the first day of the Farnborough Airshow. The aircraft is described as a twin-engine, low-observable fighter.
Air Force Under Secretary Matthew Donovan told reporters interoperability is the most important feature when any partner is building a platform critical to an allied fight.
“Other folks who are going to develop new technologies, we highly encourage that, because we don’t have the corner on the market for sure,” he said. “But we want to make sure that they are going to fit into the joint coalition warfare fighting system they have in the future, so [that] we can agree on standards moving forward.”
Will Roper, assistant secretary of the air force for acquisition, technology and logistics, told reporters during the same briefing the U.S. must work with its allies, especially the UK, on the next generation of air dominance.
“A lot of what we’re going to have to determine about the future depends on the direction that we think threats are evolving, but not just our threats – it’s also the world of commercial technology,” he said. “Now we live in a world where sensors are increasingly propagating because of commercial investment – we have to weigh the pros and cons.”
Roper is visiting the UK’s Rapid Capabilities Office, which is a mirror of the Pentagon’s, to discuss ways the two entities can work together, he said.
“To achieve the National Defense Strategy we can’t do it alone. We’re going to have to be able to not just fight with our allies – we’re going to have to be able to build things with them,” Roper said.
Now, as you know, the UK invested all its pride and defense budget in two royal luxury yachts that can only operate helicopters and F-35B, so it's not like they have any alternative to remaining an F-35 nation. Since the British will operate F-35, and can't afford to replace them with something else, there shouldn't be any worry that the Tempest project, if it were to actually become a real thing, would have networking issues with the F-35. Interoperability isn't going to be a problem, at least on the British side. It's only potentially the American side that can make it a problem, by just refusing to open up their standards enough to let the British engineers make something that works with it.
So when you translate all this lovely diplomatic language in this light, here's what the Americans are saying:
"It's really cute you think you can develop a competitor, but we've got your balls in a vise. Either you give us our cut or you cancel your project. Don't even think you can do anything without us."