Wish they also put a EO sight on the rotor hub instead of under the nose. We'd have our own Kiowa Warrior lite.
Wish they also put a EO sight on the rotor hub instead of under the nose. We'd have our own Kiowa Warrior lite.
Did you just use American term LRIP for indian procurement?Can't wait to see this bird in the final RSH (recon and surv helo) configuration with an undernose EO pod and stub wings carrying ATGMs. With Airbus getting ready to build the Fennec in India though, LUH has competition on the horizon.
Can't believe the IA isn't starting LRIP for lack of a measly autopilot. Why delay any longer when Chetak's and Cheetah's are already on their last legs? Really frustrating state of affairs.
The issue is procurement system not some conspiracy by services. They are just delivering LSP order. Bigger order will be initiated after it.
That was until 2-3 years ago. The decision to split the order was a very rational one made more than a decade ago. It didn't happen due to an unattainable clause requiring something like 65% localization, which even the LUH wouldn't have today. Thus, it broke down during negotiations. Procedurally, it was a done deal. We could have inducted 50+ Ka-226 helicopters by now. Lease is not for Ka-226, but fill the gap till LUH production gets going. It can still happen.As recently as last year, there was news about the Army wanting to go in for an emergency purchase or lease of the KA226. With full backing from HAL, no less! It doesn't give you much confidence that orders won't be split between the two. If that happens, it would be a monumental mistake.
This program has seen several stops and starts for dubious reasons long before the LUH was even flying. I'm not making any accusations but when you consider that the Ka-226 was rejected the first time around, re-entered the competition again with a French engine and then went on to win, you're going to suspect something amiss.It's easy to blame services from the sidelines. They are the ones who end up using outdated platforms and facing consequences on a daily basis.
How did you come to the conclusions about the performance of the Ka-226 with the French engine? It seems like a baseless accusation without any evidence or reasoning. I would trust the services for evaluating performance. This default suspicion does not benefit anyone.This program has seen several stops and starts for dubious reasons long before the LUH was even flying. I'm not making any accusations but when you consider that the Ka-226 was rejected the first time around, re-entered the competition again with a French engine and then went on to win, you're going to suspect something amiss.
The reason given was the Ka-226 had a higher flight ceiling because of a twin-engine configuration. If the IA was keen on finalizing a winner, it should have gone with the Fennec, the first time. It meet the specified tender requirements for payload and hover performance. It's just a case of great being the enemy of good enough.
Besides, the Russian armed forces only fly a handful of these machines which means it would be left to India to sort out performance and maintenance issues on its own dime. The Fennec otoh was a proven design with civilian and military customers worldwide. Our Western neighbours fly them too.
Imo, the modular cabin on the Ka-226 would be a hassle in terms of logistics and turnaround time than a conventional airframe.
Anyways, it's water under the bridge now. One can only hope that we opt for more Dhruv's to fill in for the Chetak/Chetah's until the LUH is ready. An imported solution, leased or not, would be insanity imo.
This program has seen several stops and starts for dubious reasons long before the LUH was even flying. I'm not making any accusations but when you consider that the Ka-226 was rejected the first time around, re-entered the competition again with a French engine and then went on to win, you're going to suspect something amiss.
The reason given was the Ka-226 had a higher flight ceiling because of a twin-engine configuration. If the IA was keen on finalizing a winner, it should have gone with the Fennec, the first time. It meet the specified tender requirements for payload and hover performance. It's just a case of great being the enemy of good enough.
Besides, the Russian armed forces only fly a handful of these machines which means it would be left to India to sort out performance and maintenance issues on its own dime. The Fennec otoh was a proven design with civilian and military customers worldwide. Our Western neighbours fly them too.
Imo, the modular cabin on the Ka-226 would be a hassle in terms of logistics and turnaround time than a conventional airframe.
Anyways, it's water under the bridge now. One can only hope that we opt for more Dhruv's to fill in for the Chetak/Chetah's until the LUH is ready. An imported solution, leased or not, would be insanity imo.
prototype ? Isn this in limited series production.LUH prototype-1 seen during Tarang Shakti-2024 exercise:
View attachment 35724
View attachment 35725
credit: Deb Rana on insta.
This particular model was the 1st flying prototype of LUH.prototype ? Isn this in limited series production.
The Indian Army needs 225 LUH & a deal for 110 LUH is currently in the cost negotiation
There are plans for the Armed Forces to increasingly move towards outsourcing of major platforms and equipment instead of buying them — these need massive capital expenditure — and the Army’s move to hire the helicopters reflects that.