I think these are Mech Inf guys or Armoured Corp guys. They wear such head gear. @Falcon
The Emblem at the rear is of some cavalery or Lancers regiment.
Mechanized Troops it is, sir.
I think these are Mech Inf guys or Armoured Corp guys. They wear such head gear. @Falcon
The Emblem at the rear is of some cavalery or Lancers regiment.
Around 10:45 PM Combat air patrol by PAF near LOC Intercepted by our radar.....
whether f-16 was shot down or not is debatable as we dont have materialistic evidence available .Whatever you are smoking is strong stuff
It's the same smoke trail, as the video from Pakistani side. This one is recorded from Indian side as evident from the language.
whether f-16 was shot down or not is debatable as we dont have materialistic evidence available .
But there was certainly AMRAAM missile used and whose debris recovered.
Now that brings up interesting scenarios,
1) The AMRAAM was fired from F-16 , in all possibilities Pakistan will claim that it was used in self defence.
2) AMRAAM has been integrated with JF-17 , most of the ppl might disagree with it as it is not technically feasible to do so. But who knows there might be hacks . Given that Pakistan bought 500 missiles there is no point in depending on F-16 alone(sanctions , spare parts?), as a customer there will be some effort to get it working on other platforms as well. In which case it brings our dear old China into equation. US might not be pleased with such scenario.
But who knows there might be hacks .
@Milspec @randomradio @vstol Jockey
Does the PAF attack show the limitation
Of Radars in Mountainous terrain like Kashmir
One Pakistani was saying that CAP s fly at high altitude , so the PAF planes went low
Will we need to change our SOPs
I was visiting F-16.net sometimes back yesterday. One very pertinent and troubling question which was asked by learned folks over there was how did India find the debris of AIM120C-5 so fast? They cited one lost AIM120C in Europe which entire NATO had searched for long but could not find it. So they had two hypothesis behind it:-AMRAAM integration onto JF17 is improbable. Intel is quite good on such matters. It is not as if they will induct a weapon system without us having an idea about it. It has never happened yet.
As for F-16, the precise reason why there is no F-16 'shot down' is because they are barred to be used in aggressive roles. We have ample ELINT to ascertain that not only was F-16 involved but also that one was locked and shot down.
AMRAAM integration onto JF17 is improbable. Intel is quite good on such matters. It is not as if they will induct a weapon system without us having an idea about it. It has never happened yet.
As for F-16, the precise reason why there is no F-16 'shot down' is because they are barred to be used in aggressive roles. We have ample ELINT to ascertain that not only was F-16 involved but also that one was locked and shot down.
Extremely unlikely. Hacking into the integration code would compromise the ITARs (and end user agreements) at highest level (and expose the logic to the ITAR kill code US would have hard coded in relevant parts of the EEPROM array (the missile's BIOS one can say) - I can confirm this stuff exists but I cannot disclose more).
Pakistan (as silly and desperate as they can be) would not attempt that (by say bringing in Chinese engineers etc)....because the risk (given what they invest and rely on w.r.t F-16 and its US hardware+software) is simply too high to them by such an action....and they would also have been found out in short order during the US weapons checks.
Its not just that... Till very recently CIA had a major presence in China. Media always focuses on Chinese infiltrating US but it works the other way round as well. If they found evidence of an integration activity in China, it would spell death knell to PAF F-16s.Extremely unlikely. Hacking into the integration code would compromise the ITARs (and end user agreements) at highest level (and expose the logic to the ITAR kill code US would have hard coded in relevant parts of the EEPROM array (the missile's BIOS one can say) - I can confirm this stuff exists but I cannot disclose more).
Pakistan (as silly and desperate as they can be) would not attempt that (by say bringing in Chinese engineers etc)....because the risk (given what they invest and rely on w.r.t F-16 and its US hardware+software) is simply too high to them by such an action....and they would also have been found out in short order during the US weapons checks.
F-16 is one of the most widely produced platform and several countries have excess of these birds for sale. It is easier to acquire these and get them serviced by Toor-Key than to attempt an integration of AIM120C. Besides, why will China do it for PAF? They will like them to buy more Chinese junk. They may keep 120C-5 sample, TYVM but will refuse integration.Yes technically it might not be technically feasible, but just put yourself into Pakistan's shoes and think about it. If you buy 500 missiles , would you depend on only one platform which is prone to sanctions?
Just showing a piece of AMRAAM with a contract number Pakistan never had means nothing. These items can be bought from eBay and Military memorabilia websites and dealers.whether f-16 was shot down or not is debatable as we dont have materialistic evidence available .
But there was certainly AMRAAM missile used and whose debris recovered.
Now that brings up interesting scenarios,
1) The AMRAAM was fired from F-16 , in all possibilities Pakistan will claim that it was used in self defence.
2) AMRAAM has been integrated with JF-17 , most of the ppl might disagree with it as it is not technically feasible to do so. But who knows there might be hacks . Given that Pakistan bought 500 missiles there is no point in depending on F-16 alone(sanctions , spare parts?), as a customer there will be some effort to get it working on other platforms as well. In which case it brings our dear old China into equation. US might not be pleased with such scenario.
These are fake and made in China... US will be able to analyse the casing material for its composition and tell if they are real or fake pretty fast.Just showing a piece of AMRAAM with a contract number Pakistan never had means nothing. These items can be bought from eBay and Military memorabilia websites and dealers.
I was visiting F-16.net sometimes back yesterday. One very pertinent and troubling question which was asked by learned folks over there was how did India find the debris of AIM120C-5 so fast? They cited one lost AIM120C in Europe which entire NATO had searched for long but could not find it. So they had two hypothesis behind it:-
1. We lost one more A/C which fell into J&K. Or one more A/C was hit but it returned to base. Hence the missile remained lodged in the airframe or its debris fell near the A/C airframe debris.
2. They believe F-16 were there to escort the attackers and operated from behind 10 KM into LoC. PAF is trying to avoid pushing the second A/C angle because it will force them to admit they used F-16 against India.
3. India is only showing missile because otherwise we will have to admit losing one more A/C.
The other possiblity is that India has recovered the debris of F-16 and hence Missile debris with labels so much intact. Why the heck we are not making it public is beyond me then...
Ofcourse being American, they were convinced that PAF had to use F-16s because Chinese BVRs are worthless so only F-16 can be used to infiltrate and beat Indian CAP.
Hmm.. certainly possible. The area was under AWACS surveillance as well, right?Not an expert by any stretch of imagination but
1. Flight data recorder of the 2nd MiG-21 will have the location / bearing / altitude etc when the aircraft dodged the AMRAAM. extrapolate the data you will have a rough idea of the area of possible ground impact .
2. Radar tracks from the entire episode should contain the tracks of the AMRAAM which will help to locate the general area of ground impact
3. Indians are extraordinarily lucky at finding wreckage of BVRAAMs
Given that MIG-21 was chasing F-16 across the LOC in all probability if it was shot down it would have fallen in PoK, so chances of India having F-16 debris is very less.I was visiting F-16.net sometimes back yesterday. One very pertinent and troubling question which was asked by learned folks over there was how did India find the debris of AIM120C-5 so fast? They cited one lost AIM120C in Europe which entire NATO had searched for long but could not find it. So they had two hypothesis behind it:-
1. We lost one more A/C which fell into J&K. Or one more A/C was hit but it returned to base. Hence the missile remained lodged in the airframe or its debris fell near the A/C airframe debris.
2. They believe F-16 were there to escort the attackers and operated from behind 10 KM into LoC. PAF is trying to avoid pushing the second A/C angle because it will force them to admit they used F-16 against India.
3. India is only showing missile because otherwise we will have to admit losing one more A/C.
The other possiblity is that India has recovered the debris of F-16 and hence Missile debris with labels so much intact. Why the heck we are not making it public is beyond me then...
Ofcourse being American, they were convinced that PAF had to use F-16s because Chinese BVRs are worthless so only F-16 can be used to infiltrate and beat Indian CAP.
yeah they can be bought, but not in 2 days when you need them immediately!Just showing a piece of AMRAAM with a contract number Pakistan never had means nothing. These items can be bought from eBay and Military memorabilia websites and dealers.
View attachment 4675
Not just that, the serial numbers cann't be found. Contract number are public information. Serial numbers? doubt it.Given that MIG-21 was chasing F-16 across the LOC in all probability if it was shot down it would have fallen in PoK, so chances of India having F-16 debris is very less.
Even if we have the F-16 debris it is better to keep quiet. Long time back there were uncoreports that Singapore used to Indian airbases for practice and had stationed few F-16 permanently in west bengal or orissa.
yeah they can be bought, but not in 2 days when you need them immediately!
Not aware of this one.
I think there is another one who crashed Su30 MKI twice. Pls correct me if wrong.
I was visiting F-16.net sometimes back yesterday. One very pertinent and troubling question which was asked by learned folks over there was how did India find the debris of AIM120C-5 so fast? They cited one lost AIM120C in Europe which entire NATO had searched for long but could not find it. So they had two hypothesis behind it:-
1. We lost one more A/C which fell into J&K. Or one more A/C was hit but it returned to base. Hence the missile remained lodged in the airframe or its debris fell near the A/C airframe debris.
2. They believe F-16 were there to escort the attackers and operated from behind 10 KM into LoC. PAF is trying to avoid pushing the second A/C angle because it will force them to admit they used F-16 against India.
3. India is only showing missile because otherwise we will have to admit losing one more A/C.
The other possiblity is that India has recovered the debris of F-16 and hence Missile debris with labels so much intact. Why the heck we are not making it public is beyond me then...
Ofcourse being American, they were convinced that PAF had to use F-16s because Chinese BVRs are worthless so only F-16 can be used to infiltrate and beat Indian CAP.
huh? source?If you have an account there, tell them that the AMRAAM hit someone's house, and the owner called the police, who in turn called the army.