What's the point? We've already opened our air space to them? Our trade with Afghanistan is being impacted.28th is two days away. We want the airspace ban to be extended. It serves our purpose.
What's the point? We've already opened our air space to them? Our trade with Afghanistan is being impacted.28th is two days away. We want the airspace ban to be extended. It serves our purpose.
@vstol Jockey I'm speculating that some source (maybe the US?) is going to release information on the Dogfight. Or else, why will PAF suddenly give out a detalied PR move on this at this time?
a) They're definitely going to confirm that F 16 were there (else why will PAF accept)
b) They will definitely confirm AMRAAMs were used (PAF confirms)
c) They'll probably say that an F 16 B was downed ( because PAF has confirmed F 16 B was there and has only put out the name of one pilot- a weird thing to do)
Tanker s role is refuelling fighters..
It is flying South..
But no hit.
Something in the airspace over sea?
Well since there is no official claim for the "penetrator" version, and given that you don't indulge in speculation, I'd say we drop the penetrator theory, specially when it arose after nearly a week of the strikes when the first satellite imagery came out.
Glad that you mentioned the Popeye/Crystal Maze. There is also some speculation that they were to be used to "provide video and bring down the buildings". I fail to comprehend how SPICE (which shares the TV/IIR seeker of Popeye), could not deliver the same results. IAF didn't have enough time to maintain LoS with whatever SOWs it could launch, so there was no possibility of retaining data-link for video or man-in-the-loop guidance to begin with. Secondly, the warhead is reportedly 150lbs (80kg), the same as in the alleged "penetrators".
Rightly said.
As far as I know, the impact angle has to be specified while generating the mission profile. I've seen videos of it hitting targets at angles ranging from 30 to 90 degrees. Here's a nice video from Rafael:
Oh forget it bro. Nothing like that. Chabahar hai na.What's the point? We've already opened our air space to them? Our trade with Afghanistan is being impacted.
28th is two days away. We want the airspace ban to be extended. It serves our purpose.
Tankers role is Refueling, full stop.
Its not flying south, its only turned on its transponder near some civilian traffic as mandated by
the controller to relay info to the ATC/TCAS
Lets not over speculate my friend.
Bomb craters correlating with the damage caused by 2000lbs GP bombs appeared on the night of 26th February, 150-200m off the alleged JeM camp. On-ground reporters, witnesses, low-res infrared satellite imagery from PlanetLabs and high-res optical satellite imagery from ESI have correlated and confirmed this fact.
There was no need of employing penetration munitions, given all structures at the target site were civilian and non-hardened. A simple delayed impact fuze on a general purpose bomb would have achieved the same result.
There are no points of ingress visible in the 50cm resolution satellite imagery by ESI on any of the structures present at the site. So far a set of collinear 3x rectangular black pixels have been identified on a 20x20m structure's eastern roof joint, which actually are image artifacts.
@randomradio what the hell are you talking about? Vishnu Som has confirmed it was penetrator version.
Seems like closure of this thread is never going to happen 
Sorry to ask a noob question, tanker won't be carrying fuel to the base right?
( I mean severe shortage of fuel at base)
Question-
In a recent interview pilots who conducted the strike said they hit the targets. In absence of video feed what other options pilot have to confirm the hit for stand off weapons. Distance was around 70km visual confirmation is not posible were they briefed later at base or some others sensors keep track of weapon released and it's impact point.
@panzerdad @vstol Jockey @Falcon @The Deterrent and anyone else who knows more about it.
I need to correct you here. The aircraft was F-16B which was taken from Jordan and upgraded to F-16D standards in MLU. Please read about it. So the F-16B is correct designation for the aircraft type.
In all records, they are called F-16B only.If it was modernised to Pakistani standards, then it would be F-16BM.
Sir Iran is not happening.
We all know. Iran is not Iraq.
Plus the Shia population isn't limited to Iran.
Bahrain KSA Qatar they all have them.
That's a different thread and new war theatre.
If there is another thread link me there and I'll pour some points to consider
In all records, they are called F-16B only.
Second they are trying to sell the F16 to India.
No question is silly
Fuel supply as the base is replenished through other means, these tankers stick to aerial roles.
Admitting that will affect other markets, not India.
Sorry to ask a noob question, tanker won't be carrying fuel to the base right?
U mean India doesn't care about it, will go ahead and buy..
Or
Anyways India is not going to buy. No problem.
U mean India doesn't care about it, will go ahead and buy..
Or
Anyways India is not going to buy. No problem.