Status
Not open for further replies.
Balakot is a cpec project site so as I told in previous post, that the Balakot strike was not only for Pakistan but Chinese Sponsored Pakistani terrorism.

This is what exactly two front war is about.

In Balakot area they will be building dam, and I am sure Chinese PLA guys will taking cover as adminstrative workers engineers to carry out covert operations in India so that they don't directly get involved.


"
He said this is the only hydropower project in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on the
CPEC list and the Project is listed as the high priority ‘Early Harvest Project
(EHP)’ within CPEC projects."

Studies suggested potential sites for these projects at Batakundi, Naran, Suki Kinari,
Balakot and Patrind. Run-of-the-river project envisages that the water is drawn from
the river, taken to the turbines in a powerhouse, located down stream through tunnel
and after running the turbines and producing energy, the water is again diverted back
to the river.

Suki Kinari Hydropower project to ensure 3000 jobs for locals in 2019-20 | Associated Press Of Pakistan



Screenshot (316)_LI.jpg
 
What's up with inconsistency in number of AMRAAMs? Tu-fail says PAF fired 2 AMRAAMs but IAF counted atleast 4-5.

How does it matter whether they fired two or three. Even they would have calculated after 2 days how many were fired lol. Infact PAF was not clear to whom they shot and what exactly happened. But in hurry to win media perception they acted.

wait 5 years more thing will be out .
 
How does it matter whether they fired two or three. Even they would have calculated after 2 days how many were fired lol. Infact PAF was not clear to whom they shot and what exactly happened. But in hurry to win media perception they acted.

wait 5 years more thing will be out .
The best part is that they awarded an AMRAAM shot to a guy who fired on a radar blip which disappeared. This is how the jamming works. You are there and suddenly not there. seems PAF is full of monkeies who have no clue of EW Jamming.
 
Frankly this is all getting repetitive and tedious. A few months back we were told as soon as the strike package of the PAF were bounced by the MiG 21's they immediately jettisoned their SoW & fled. Now we're told the SoW's were fired from inside PoK and that the jammers prevented the SoW's from hitting the desired targets. Ditto for the AMRAAM's and the MKI. A few months back we were informed these missiles were fired at maximum range, hence providing ample time to the MKI's to take evasive measures. Why didn't the MKI's respond in kind is another mystery.

Now you're re itirating a fresh set of theories doing the rounds since the past week.

Why don't all concerned parties come together and synthesise this narrative so as to clear up the confusion once and for all.

STATUTORY WARNING - PLS AVOID SEEKING ASSISTANCE OR INPUTS FROM RESIDENT OPTIMIST.

Too many mistakes there.
 
You guys already banned me on indian defence forum and it was me who was abused.abuses are common in indian defence forum.thank God we don't have this culture here.
Are you sure? There is no evidence.
Hahahaha.
again you ask for evidences ? you ran away and did not reply me when i questioned you viz a viz evidences or credible evidence . yaad hai ?
 
Every member here must have read the missile tests done by our own DRDO against electronic targets. How is an electronic target created????
PAF probably has no clue of it and that is why they claimed a SU-30MKI down.

the concept is easy..

reflect a modified signal which changes the flight profile.
 
Was there any need for EW jamming at all? Ranges at which those AMRAAMs were fired can be easily countered with fighter jet maneuvering. Only rationale is when fighter jet has to stay position for defense of ground asset.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BlackOpsIndia
How does it matter whether they fired two or three. Even they would have calculated after 2 days how many were fired lol. Infact PAF was not clear to whom they shot and what exactly happened. But in hurry to win media perception they acted.

wait 5 years more thing will be out .


It matters because it was to ridicule IAF AMRAAMs dodger patch or patches counting su30 and mig 21 as individual
 
Can you be more stupid and elaborate?

use of noise jamming and deception jamming

while escorting the attack package the jammer is placed above the attack package it, then applies noise jamming by injecting high powered beams into the target radar. This then denies azimuth range etc information to the target radar.

on sukhois, it's basically deceptive jamming system installed, they require less power than noise jamming. They simply store the incoming radar signals use ADC and store in sample separately, known as sampling and then modifies it using EW suite , which is a software to attenuating the signal with false info and then relay it using DAC to the target radar.
 
use of noise jamming and deception jamming

while escorting the attack package the jammer is placed above the attack package it, then applies noise jamming by injecting high powered beams into the target radar. This then denies azimuth range etc information to the target radar.

on sukhois, it's basically deceptive jamming system installed, they require less power than noise jamming. They simply store the incoming radar signals use ADC and store in sample separately, known as sampling and then modifies it using EW suite , which is a software to attenuating the signal with false info and then relay it using DAC to the target radar.

You can easily summarize to DRFM ELTA 8222 pod.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screambowl
The problem is, to the world, it was an attack on "disputed" territory rather than sovereign territory. Whereas our attack was on sovereign territory, even if it was termed "non-military".


The narrative has to be decided by the political powers that be in the center. If they subscribe to the view, that of disputed territory, then they are justified and we may as well take a re-look at our aims in Kashmir.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.