Status
Not open for further replies.
at least they did well by hurting Iran's nuclear program and what we did with pakistan, is told them about our own assets working under cover.
Please give your kinds suggestions to Government of India and tell them that Mossad is not reliable and not effective so stop all connections and training programs with them.

I am very very sure they will welcome your suggestion with a garland of lotus!
If they were thru with the Iranian Nuclear program why's Netanyahu screaming at the top of his lungs since the last 4 years asking the US to rescind the JCPoA?

Did I say the Mossad is unreliable? Or did I hint that their tactics against the Hezbollah & the Iranians haven't fetched them the desired results?

You're the one who keeps making suggestions here . You're the most opinionated one here. From India's Pakistan policy to our N tests to the state of affairs of our Kashmir policy.To how effective ISI has been.To how every section of our society and polity is compromised.It's your thoughts worth it's weight in gold that the GoI must look forward to.
 
unless it was a measure intended to serve some ulterior motives isn't it ? ( Eg Signature masking of nukes / no of nukes , obscuration of data logging and post test analysis by foreign assets etc ) :geek:

You claim of 7 instead of 5 is one strong reason

.:)
 
I don't know what do you mean. You should have refereed to my previous posts where I have already said that it is possible for a 155mm as well with 2kt yield. You can simply make a 4kg Pu239 go supercritical. Because there is less space to levitate the pit hence all 4kg won't be compressed as in bigger diameter ones, hence low neutron per shrek compared to bigger ones. This is why where the yield has to be 7-8kt it will get restricted to 2kT. But there will be big bang and enhanced radiation.



We call it enhanced radiation weapons not a standard fission weapon. This is know as fizzle. This happens due to small size or improper design.


ERWs are a different subject. Please.

I said sub-kiloton & 155mm. Only an idiot and an ignorant will put a 20 kt yield on 155 mm in subcontinental battlefield. When you have no clue on principles of targeting being followed by us, it is best to keep mum. If I wanted to elaborate, I would have. If you were supposed to know precise yields, you would have known.

It is most difficult to calibrate yields to suit employment principles of a weapon.
 
With DPICM submunitions maybe

But with the smart " search and destroy " submunitions , no. They qualified the same on a mortar round long time back. And are currently developing the same for other dispensing systems.

It is very difficult to find info regarding the kinetic effectors in India , one can find info on the delivery system's but very little or no info on the type of warheads .

Long time back in the wikileaks info that got out , Americans had detected the tests of a very large FAE type aerial bomb but even now in public domain no such DRDO bomb exists. Instead on the contrary they publish documents where they show testing of prototype FAE bombs of far smaller scale. :rolleyes:

Only recently I found info regarding multistage warhead for defeating deeply buried hardened targets. Combination of precursor shaped charge warhead with follow through stages of penetrators.

Sorely needed because por........ SPD uses buried structures with triple reinforced concrete slabs with layers of steel bar mesh , steel slabs and reactive explosives inbetween and ofcourse natural obstructions to defeat overhead strikes.

Brahmos nor any publically known operational systems does not have the capability to defeat the same.

And again another example

View attachment 10437

No info exists on it

tunnel model seems to me like a air to surface deep earth penetrator ordinance.

Interestingly it has grid/lattice fins. That should mean high controllability at high AoA .

Long story short it's difficult to answer questions regarding indian projects.


Also recently I found out K-4 has control surface fins , now that is unexpected in a long range SLBM, any info on the same from your side ?

Thanks for an insightful analysis.

Personally, K4 did a fine job in its operational tests. As for the bold, query was sent with answer received as "No comments".

Sorry. That is it.
 
Why hasn't 10k SSBM aka Surya been reported about?
You mean ICBM Surya ? Was it tested, because an ICBM launch would not have escaped anybody... Although, I understand we need to have a true ICBM, in case America resorts to nuclear Blackmail...
 
You mean ICBM Surya ? Was it tested, because an ICBM launch would not have escaped anybody... Although, I understand we need to have a true ICBM, in case America resorts to nuclear Blackmail...


Do you need to launch a missile to 10k to induct it if it is designed to fly 10 k? Can it be limited to fly 3k?
 
Do you need to launch a missile to 10k to induct it if it is designed to fly 10 k? Can it be limited to fly 3k?
Yes... But then, was it launched at an elevated trajectory, because even that would be a giveaway of the missile's range to US and other observers...
 
ERWs are a different subject. Please.

ERW is not different subject.
Only an idiot and an ignorant will put a 20 kt yield on 155 mm in subcontinental battlefield.
When you have no clue on principles of targeting being followed by us, it is best to keep mum.
Your adversary is an idiot who might have put 10-20kT on so called tactical nukes.

India did conduct a linear implosion type detonation but as one is unaware of the data whether it is achievable on 155mm for India it's doubtful for 208mm definitely more than 20kT. This is why I said 2-20kt.


You're the one who keeps making suggestions here . You're the most opinionated one here.

This is a discussion thread I guess where opinions are welcomed and from day one my opinions and predictions are coming true :P may be it's astrology or whatsoever. I said there won't be any war except some routine CFV , I said Chadrayan would crash land it happened so, well the things are as it is as they were after 27th.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.