India - Pakistan Standoff 2019
- Thread starter nair
- Start date
- Status
Why for EMP blast to bring down fighter formations ? lol...
kumar saab , i am sticking to the topic , you use wrong spelling
they will never reach anywhere , this is porpaganda started by janani pakistan fauj just to do some face saving among themselves as their janani fauji generals also feel helpless now . there can be revolt among janani pakistani fauj sooner or later too .
Emergency BMD.
SAMs meant to defeat aircraft have inferior accuracy against BMs. But a nuke has the blast radius necessary to veer warhead off course even if the SAM is not very accurate.
The choice is between an explosive and a nuke. So Akash comes fitted for but not with.
Your cure is worse than the disease. With a range of just 30-40 kms, how will an Akash prevent a nuclear Blast? In fact armed with a nuke, it may trigger an air burst once it collides with a nuclear warhead.
These are control surfaces for Kfour.
Hence for a layman like me most probably for trajectory shaping.
In other forum had a discussion regarding the position of these control surfaces on Kfour . But unfortunately too little info to draw a definite conclusion.
One idea that was propounded was that it was part of the RV , but I couldn't agree with that , aerodynamic shaping of fins found in RVs are highly tapered and blended with the RV body for the obvious reasons.
Another thing which complicates matter is Kfour is flush with its canister other than for the internal guide rails of canister , there is bare little clearance for something like a protruding fin on the surface of Kfour. Unless it is deployed in flight as canards aka a forward control surface during highly depressed trajectory flights inorder to negate induced rolling moments encounter in flight maneuvers within the atmosphere at high supersonic or hypersonic speeds or even as a complement to act as a counterbalance to retro motors induced rolling of entire missile for dissipation of built up heat on the surface while flying in a depressed trajectory within the atmosphere.
Also I believe the fins are ablative for the obvious reasons however , no info was given on the same.
In the end of exhaust one can find ablative control surfaces which forms what is known as TVC.
However IMO the said fins are shaped different from the usual shape employed in TVC.
This one is a ablative component of a unidentified indian missile and for example finds use in systems employing TVC like the one below
Also this kind of proves that the said fins are not part of TVC of Kfour
In the end , funny thing is
I am not sure of nothing except that these are control surfaces of Kfour
Last edited:
Ok a follow up question on the RD93s. Pakistanis claim they went ahead of the Russians and solved the black smoke issue with the 93s? How credible do you think this claim is?
Yes
That would result in a self inflicted wound
Indian electronic systems within the zone of the blast though physically protected will still be put into harm's way and certain components might suffer functional failure due to induced transient currents and voltage spikes. EMP safeguards are enforced in only critical systems , other systems have resistance built in but not foolproof countermeasures , too expensive.
Also all homeside communication channels would be severely effected due to the resulting ionisation of a nuke blast, however small the nuke is and will spread gradually and persist for some time before diminishing.
Meanwhile in Paxtan...rumours doing the rounds that niazi is handing PSM to China via a G2G deal 
the money trap just got sprung
the money trap just got sprung
Sir I never make claims, I only say that there is a possibility as per the scenario. The reason why I mentioned that an israeli nue might have been tested by India is due to the fact 18 months just before the test APJ Kalam went to Israel. By that time India had decided to conduct the test.
The only other main reason why a scientist of that level would go to Israel is the ballistic Missile project. I do not claim that its true but there is a possibility.
We were talking about yield and design. So I made a post.
How sure are you that Pakistan's tactical nuke is very much tactical what they claim to be and it's not a standard weapon knowing the fact that even deploying a tactical nuke it will be inviting megatons of retaliation?
- Status