Which ships?Navy would like 2-3 more 6m size LR-MFR on ships for next 2 years timeframe
View attachment 35592
View attachment 35593
for reference
Which ships?Navy would like 2-3 more 6m size LR-MFR on ships for next 2 years timeframe
View attachment 35592
View attachment 35593
for reference
Great work by our scientists. However looks like a working prototype is still a decade away(hopefully early).
Unlikely a decade, few years maybe. Some baseline blocks are already made and proven. This TD is likely for establishing the core tech and for preparing the technical documentation which suggests the work is quite ahead. Most likely 3-4 years work depending on how many manpower work on that part. Could complete within 2-3 years if enough, say 6 engg team working on it. It mentioned 18 months projected.Great work by our scientists. However looks like a working prototype is still a decade away(hopefully early).
I just wish that AMCA MK2 and our future MKI replacement has this photonics based radar. Let's hope for the best
Oh yes! What I meant by almost a decade was its implementation into serial production for our fighter jets.Unlikely a decade, few years maybe. Some baseline blocks are already made and proven. This TD is likely for establishing the core tech and for preparing the technical documentation which suggests the work is quite ahead. Most likely 3-4 years work depending on how many manpower work on that part. Could complete within 2-3 years if enough, say 6 engg team working on it. It mentioned 18 months projected.
The usual twitter banter, lol. Anyways, it's true that most of our AESA tech is derived from Israeli tech and even our ASPJ pods are heavily inspired by them. But giving all-credit to the Israelis undermines the hard work our scientists have done especially in the GaN tech.
@Gautam @Rajput Lion @randomradio
@_Anonymous_
Above tweet is a reply for below tweet.
Then this happened..
What's happening..
The usual twitter banter, lol. Anyways, it's true that most of our AESA tech is derived from Israeli tech and even our ASPJ pods are heavily inspired by them. But giving all-credit to the Israelis undermines the hard work our scientists have done especially in the GaN tech.
Regarding MKI UPG. vs Rafale. Well both are required along with a stealth fighter. In fact, we should order 36 more Rafale F4.2 along with 26 Rafale M as an immediate stopgap until MRFA winner is selected(I hope its Rafale).
The truth as always lies in-between two extremes
@Gautam @Rajput Lion @randomradio
@_Anonymous_
Above tweet is a reply for below tweet.
Then this happened..
What's happening..
The plan is to make MKI as indigenous as possible(78%). So I think that's about it.@randomradio @Rajput Lion
Other than certification and FBW/flight control system mods, is there anything else Russia is contributing to the MKI UPG as the OEM?
Definitely possible. As per Prasun da:Also, any chance we could be moving to MIL-1760 fibre-optic databuses for higher computing power on the MKI, maybe derived from AMCA? TIA
Consequently, only the fire-control, weapons management and self-protection avionics suites will be upgraded (replacing Russian-origin hardware and software) using dual redundant MIL-STD-1553B databus-based architecture, along with MIL-STD-1760 stores (weapons) interfaces.
@randomradio @Rajput Lion
Other than certification and FBW/flight control system mods, is there anything else Russia is contributing to the MKI UPG as the OEM?
Also, any chance we could be moving to MIL-1760 fibre-optic databuses for higher computing power on the MKI, maybe derived from AMCA? TIA