You probably failed to read and understand me completely. I am for India and everything which is Indian and what is India. Our guys using that design and creating a seeker of their own in a frequency band which can't be detected by 99.99% fourth Gen fighters is by no means a trivial achievement.To be fair sir, everything we make is borrowed in some form. Either its the architecture or maybe just the conceptual idea. You can say the same about 99.99% of weapon manufacturers. But nonetheless it shouldn't belittle what has been achieved. For a first attempt, I am mighty impressed.
Went back and read the following comments, realized that I totally jumped the gun there. My apologies Sir, got too exited.You probably failed to read and understand me completely.
Whoa, did not see that coming. I presume seekers are only going to get better with time/usage, also with maturing of SFDR technology we are looking at the makings of a serious air dominance weapon.We used our technology to modify it and convert it to a Ka band seeker head. 99% of 4th Gen fighters flying in the world do not have ESM and jamming capability for Ka band.
I will be very interested in SFDR and Astra Mk-2. I can tell you that Indian brain is the finest in the world and if we are able to develop these techs successfully, we will have the world beating tech with us.How long do you think it will take to mature the SFDR ? Livefist reported a decade. Seems a bit too long.
Don't you think the current Astra mk 1 is a bit lower on the range ? What would be the range of Astrta mk 2 ?
You probably already know this. Its been out for a while. It seems Astra mk-2 and SFDR based missile are two different projects. Mk-2 is supposed to be a intermediate between MK-1 and SFDR in terms of range. The link below will give you a CFD of Astra mk-2.I will be very interested in SFDR and Astra Mk-2. I can tell you that Indian brain is the finest in the world and if we are able to develop these techs successfully, we will have the world beating tech with us.









Still, you didn't explain why you think we just took complete agat architecture. Just because we initially used an imported item?We have used the complete architecture of Agat in This. the Initial lot of Astra missiles had fully imported seeker. We learnt from them and developed one for ourselves. We used our technology to modify it and convert it to a Ka band seeker head. 99% of 4th Gen fighters flying in the world do not have ESM and jamming capability for Ka band.
SFDR project is a JV with the Russians. And it's a TD to validate propulsion, not the whole missile.I will be very interested in SFDR and Astra Mk-2. I can tell you that Indian brain is the finest in the world and if we are able to develop these techs successfully, we will have the world beating tech with us.
Still, you didn't explain why you think we just took complete agat architecture. Just because we initially used an imported item?
If you go by the DRDO's works as evidence then it's clear that they go for clean sheet design.
Manik engine which will replace NPO Saturn 36MT on nirbhay has better performance specifications. Same goes for the new 1500hp engine under development for Arjun. Its designed to outperform the German ones. In both cases, we went for a superior state of the art design.
Edit: Added references
Doesn't necessarily have to be maximum range trials. Let's wait for mare details.2 - 3 km range???

At 14.5 kg weight , 3rd gen ATGM , 2-3km range is fine.2 - 3 km range???
We should put in the 1900hp electric engine of Pininfarina Battista now owned by Mahindra. That will also reduce the weight and help Arjun meet targets set by Army easily while getting more powerful.
Don't think so. Just my opinion. Firstly how do you charge the batteries in the battlefield ? Secondly the Battista's power train doesn't even have a transmission. Great for takeoff speeds and acceleration, not for hauling armour/gun/ammo and clearing AT trenches etc. For a tank, torque figures are more important than HP.I wasn't kidding. Isn't it workable??
