Indian Political Discussion

Janardan Shukla said:
A good analogy you deserve credit for that but Sir I was representing whole Islamic ideology and its followers by that lion not a single muslim.
Click to expand...

Killing in masses is simpler than killing an ideology which is followed by 2 billion humans. You are complicating things for yourself.

Why not just settle at killing 200 millions in India?
 
Arvind said:
So how about stop investing in our kids education, stop saving for retirement plans and prepare ourselves for a genocide and loot IF threat is so real.
Click to expand...
That is the problem sir, whenever someone talks about this the others start to take it to extreme levels. Did Muslims stop to sending there children to school? You can find by yourself that all the heads of major terrorist organisations are well educated. We could give our children good education while at same time prepare them for this threat. A good start would be to teach them our scriptures like Geeta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78
Arvind said:
Killing in masses is simpler than killing an ideology which is followed by 2 billion humans. You are complicating things for yourself.

Why not just settle at killing 200 millions in India?
Click to expand...
Because I hate killing people unless it is for national security or self defence. Furthermore killing people won't prove that your ideology was right but fighting there ideology with good arguments surely will.
 
Janardan Shukla said:
That is the problem sir, whenever someone talks about this the others start to take it to extreme levels. Did Muslims stop to sending there children to school? You can find by yourself that all the heads of major terrorist organisations are well educated. We could give our children good education while at same time prepare them for this threat. A good start would be to teach them our scriptures like Geeta.
Click to expand...

Haha, did you really said this??

"whenever someone talks about this the others start to take it to extreme levels"

Just a couple of mins you were ready for genocide.
 
As usual whenever dickraa enters the entire thread gets derailed. This was supposed to be Indian Political Discussion thread. For the past few pages it's been off topic by miles. God forbid if @Aravind were here, we'd have completed 100 pages by now. Of off topic discussions.

Pls do the honours @Arvind
 
Man I cannot take part in such discussions.

I travel abroad regularly and many of you are now surely on no-fly immigration watch-lists.

Cheers, Doc
 
Milspec said:
The official explanation of some prominent leaders of Sangh say "India is for Hindus", but every time they have said this they have categorically clarified hindu (indu) as a geopolitical identity and not a religion. Anyone who identifies himself from hind is hindu, not the religion. But as often happens dimwits hordes that follow these organization take the first sentence and combine it with their own insecurities, and subvert that message as India is for Hindu (religion).

There is a bit of classical hypocrisy in that explanation, where the same Sang leaders can easily change the message to Bharat Bharitiyon/Hindustaniyon ke liya, or to that effect. If the term Hindu is to be used as a geopolitical term for the identity of people from "Hind", there is no reason to use the word that can have two meanings. But I suspect, the way it is used is specifically to promulgate not an alternative meaning for the same hordes that the same leaders claim to be misusing it. The idea that Hindu can have two meanings is convenient "get of jail" card when their feet are held to fire; all the while not accepting it's dual meaning by the mainstream keeps it catering to the mindless followers whose frustration of daily lives manifest through aggression and sometimes violence against other religions.

Education and only education can serve as the solution to all this; as far as I am concerned, India, not the just republic of India (since 1950) but the Idea of India has accepted, adapted and absorbed all different cultures, religions, traditions, cuisine's that came to it and made it it's own. Rigidity was never a civilizational trait of India if someone tries to fabricate cultural/civilizational rigidity, it is bound to fail.
Click to expand...

The narrative you have described above was indeed found prominently on the BJP website prior to 2014.

But it is my belief if no one else's that this was a clearly thought out ruse to fool a large chunk of India's disgruntled electorate who were innately secular.

What India has seen since then has clearly exposed the lie.

No one now, whether high or low, even bothers to hide or explain away the subterfuge.

That ship has sailed.

Cheers, Doc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom