How do you make reforms when the army doesn't allow it to happen?
Or why should they make reforms when the status quo perfectly works for them?
If allowed, will those supposed reforms wont eat like of NS and Zardari first?
How do you make reforms when the army doesn't allow it to happen?
Or why should they make reforms when the status quo perfectly works for them?
If allowed, will those supposed reforms wont eat like of NS and Zardari first?
Your reasoning is very wrong.I didn't understand what you meant. Can you elaborate?
My point is Pakistan needs major structural reforms to move forward. Without these reforms, the economy will always be at the point of collapse. But the army is preventing these reforms because it will change the way they have been conducting its business of running Pakistan. Even Bhutto's attempts at redistributing farmlands in the 70s was stopped by the army when Zia came to power.
For example, when Modi demonetised our currency, it brought a lot of dirt out into the open, particularly the lakhs of shell companies and their directors who were involved in money laundering. The same thing will happen to the Pak Army's companies when reforms happen.
The economic might of Pakistani military | merinews Mobile
Reforms will bring a lot of skeletons tumbling out of the army's closet.
The corruption within civilian govt has nothing to do with their economic crisis.
You see @randomradio ; were the PA to stand for elections, they'd easily win a few seats ( and that's just a start) thanks to an ever growing electorate who have favourable views about their contribution to the economy, their role in upholding law and order , besides of course, defending the country.Your reasoning is very wrong.
Most of our ambitious economic reforms were spearheaded by the military who were free from the chains of bureaucracy, our elders talk of how fast-paced development was under military rule, especially under Ayub Khan.
Yes, the Pakistan Army owns many multi-billion dollar companies that were started from scratch thanks to it's massive pool of skilled, educated and reliable labor. These companies are completely legal and crucial to the economy, the revenue earned from them mostly go back into the economy.
Corruption does not eat into foreign exchange. It only causes inequitable wealth distribution. The forex depletion, technological backwardness etc can happen when there is sabotage, generally at the behest of foreign entities. Sabotage is different from corruption and comes under treason/betrayal. Nawaz did not seem to have done any of the sabotaging activities but was only financially corrupt. So, how was Nawaz responsible for foreign exchange depletion? Whenever he tried to develop economy by bringing in temporary peace, the army scuttled it and prevented him from using long term strategy. If someone sabotaged Pakistani economy, it was the Pakistani army that refused to think long term and instead was jingoistically short sighted.Or why should they make reforms when the status quo perfectly works for them?
If allowed, will those supposed reforms wont eat like of NS and Zardari first?
You can blame them as much as you want but when military tie their hands there was not much they could have done. Your geography that can earn you in transit is held hostage, the occupied Kashmir can boost your economy by tourism but your pro terrorism image hurt not just foreign travelers but even domestic travelers. High travel and insurance costs for both import and exports makes your economy uncompetitive and uninspiring, by increasing violence in Afghanistan you put hundreds of thousands of your own people adjacent to Afghanistan border in poverty. IT industry can earn you few billions but thanks to your notorious spy agency nobody wants to deal with you and even for payments most major payment processors either deny service or charge higher commission, there is lot more I can go on and on that is easily achievable not wishful thinking.
In all this there is one common factor i.e. Pakistani military mindset. 10 year ago most Pakistani analysts use to say India can't become super power if they are not in good books of Pakistan and for that solve Kashmir issue. Otherwise they can always send some bomber and spoil investors confidence. In quest of that and to avoid blowback you put your country on lockdown. 10 years later, India is calm and Pakistan became a security state eating away whatever budget is left.
No Imran or whoever can save you unless you identify the problem. Unless you integrate with world. Only then you can expect investors coming to your country and become prosperous.
If you go objectively(which you will after 5 years of Imran yield same results) you will see Nawaz actually pulled your country out from grim situation economically. Having debt is not that big a issue, infact it's not an issue at all, it becomes issue when you can't payback, and the institution that put you in a situation of not being able to payback is not GoP but Pakistan Army.
Its very easy and actually convenient to put blame on politicians to give a way out to real perpetrators. By not pointing out the real problem you are contributing and not mitigating the economic woes.
With land grabber JKT, human trafficking and prostitution kingpin Zulfi Bukhari family, Lahore real estate mafia Aleem Khan as closest ever friend I had no hope that Imran can ever pull out Pakistan from this situation, wait and you will see how these vested interests kill any (if any) welfare agenda Imran can have. They put Imran in this seat they will have it back whatever they invested with fat interest.
Corruption does not eat into foreign exchange. It only causes inequitable wealth distribution. The forex depletion, technological backwardness etc can happen when there is sabotage, generally at the behest of foreign entities. Sabotage is different from corruption and comes under treason/betrayal. Nawaz did not seem to have done any of the sabotaging activities but was only financially corrupt. So, how was Nawaz responsible for foreign exchange depletion? Whenever he tried to develop economy by bringing in temporary peace, the army scuttled it and prevented him from using long term strategy. If someone sabotaged Pakistani economy, it was the Pakistani army that refused to think long term and instead was jingoistically short sighted.
Reforms like export increase, improving indigenous technology to reduce imports etc could have come a long way. But Pakistani army was in the way and always was in a hurry for immediate fundings and short term thinking
Your reasoning is very wrong.
Most of our ambitious economic reforms were spearheaded by the military who were free from the chains of bureaucracy, our elders talk of how fast-paced development was under military rule, especially under Ayub Khan.
Yes, the Pakistan Army owns many multi-billion dollar companies that were started from scratch thanks to it's massive pool of skilled, educated and reliable labor. These companies are completely legal and crucial to the economy, the revenue earned from them mostly go back into the economy.
Increasing exports and reducing imports and attracting remittance and FDI are the only way. This in turn requires improved stability, improved education and improved indigenous technology. Even simple things like improving the number of high quality professionals can attract huge job opportunities from gulf countries in case of Pakistan.How do you build forex?
Increasing exports and reducing imports and attracting remittance and FDI are the only way. This in turn requires improved stability, improved education and improved indigenous technology. Even simple things like improving the number of high quality professionals can attract huge job opportunities from gulf countries in case of Pakistan.
That comes under sabotage rather than corruption. Otherwise, education, technology can be developed even with corruption by a form of oligarchy where all the businessmen are related to politicians but technology is still developed. Stability of Pakistan is primarily due to double dealings in international arena and consequent backlash which also could have been avoided even with corruption. North Korea, Cuba etc have high corruption but still stable, for example.Can corruption impact stability, education and technology advancement?
Also consuming forex in non profitable assets just because such project help build in personal wealth can result in forex stress?
That comes under sabotage rather than corruption. Otherwise, education, technology can be developed even with corruption by a form of oligarchy where all the businessmen are related to politicians but technology is still developed. Stability of Pakistan is primarily due to double dealings in international arena and consequent backlash which also could have been avoided even with corruption. North Korea, Cuba etc have high corruption but still stable, for example.
Consuming forex in non-profitable assets can't be in large quantity as that ca be detected rather easily. Forex must be accounted for very carefully and hence large scale corruption is difficult. Unnecessary spending in forex is generally done as part of sabotage with support of foreign agencies rather than as corruption. Corruption can lead to sabotage but corruption itself is not sabotage.
Corruption can lead to sabotage but corruption itself is not sabotage.
Not all corruption is equal. Corruption is only legal definition. Law is not absolute and is made by other people who were not perfect themselves.We can play around with words as much as we want.
Finally you got it what I am trying to convey. Political party, even if do not want, their corruption led to sabotage of national interests.
Not all corruption is equal. Corruption is only legal definition. Law is not absolute and is made by other people who were not perfect themselves.
Your reasoning is very wrong.
Most of our ambitious economic reforms were spearheaded by the military who were free from the chains of bureaucracy, our elders talk of how fast-paced development was under military rule, especially under Ayub Khan.
Yes, the Pakistan Army owns many multi-billion dollar companies that were started from scratch thanks to it's massive pool of skilled, educated and reliable labor. These companies are completely legal and crucial to the economy, the revenue earned from them mostly go back into the economy.
Year: 2004-2009Can corruption impact stability, education and technology advancement?
Also consuming forex in non profitable assets just because such project help build in personal wealth can result in forex stress?
Year: 2004-2009
Place: India
Government lead by: Congress.
Major Scams-
2G- $25 Billion loss to exchequer
Coal Block- $150 Billion loss to exchequer
Forex reserves:
2004- $100 Billions
2009- $300 Billions
Growth rate was pumping, investment was good, made some strides in education and technology, though inflation was high but it was demand induced. Infrastructure spending was good and the corruption in it is NOT counted here.
I have no idea why you are hell bent on relating two different things just to implicate Nawaz Sharif. You can just plainly say I think Nawaz did all this along with army and I can't prove it so that we don't have to deal with silly correlations and debate. These just two scams were more than GDP of Pakistan and almost entire year budget of India, did we fail? The value of this is certified by CAG and accepted by SC and value does not indicate Congress got this much money, it means loss to nation.
Now give us some trusted numbers supporting your claims or please stop issuing blanket statements which is pure rhetoric. As I said corruption is romantic to sell but numbers don't add up.